yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Carne Asada tacos on soft corn tortillas are tough to beat, IMO. That being said, I do loves me some good "white boy" ground beef tacos on hard shells.Mikey wrote:made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
having mine with ground beef. carne asada tacos are good, but I rarely ever have themPozzo wrote:Carne Asada tacos on soft corn tortillas are tough to beat, IMO. That being said, I do loves me some good "white boy" ground beef tacos on hard shells.Mikey wrote:made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
OOoo soft tacos are the best. My favorite is definitely Fish TacosMikey wrote:having mine with ground beef. carne asada tacos are good, but I rarely ever have themPozzo wrote:Carne Asada tacos on soft corn tortillas are tough to beat, IMO. That being said, I do loves me some good "white boy" ground beef tacos on hard shells.Mikey wrote:made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
LSAC call-in: give us a taco logic game.jagerbom79 wrote:OOoo soft tacos are the best. My favorite is definitely Fish TacosMikey wrote:having mine with ground beef. carne asada tacos are good, but I rarely ever have themPozzo wrote:Carne Asada tacos on soft corn tortillas are tough to beat, IMO. That being said, I do loves me some good "white boy" ground beef tacos on hard shells.Mikey wrote:made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
- creed
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
PT 52
Score: 176
LR1: -1
LG: -2
LR2: -0
RC: -1
This was such a weird PT. Normally my LG scores are my best, but I took too long on a couple easy games and got caught when the last game was the hardest and I only had 5 minutes. This was my first shot at comparative reading and I preferred it to the default, reading slightly shorter passages improved my stamina for the full section.
Score: 176
LR1: -1
LG: -2
LR2: -0
RC: -1
This was such a weird PT. Normally my LG scores are my best, but I took too long on a couple easy games and got caught when the last game was the hardest and I only had 5 minutes. This was my first shot at comparative reading and I preferred it to the default, reading slightly shorter passages improved my stamina for the full section.
- creed
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Does anyone have hopes for certain levels of difficulty on certain sections? I think I'm hoping for as balanced a test as possible, but if I had to pick one section to make abnormally difficult, it'd probably be an LG section (or just anything but RC lol)
- sodomojo
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
YEETtwiix wrote:Only cool kids get completely murdered by RC. It's an exclusive club.Mikey wrote:we are section breakdown siblingssodomojo wrote:PT 65
169
LR1: -2
LG: -0
RC: -9
LR2: -4
And there's next to no rhyme or reason as to when I struggle on RC. On that PT alone, I got -3 on the first passage, which I spent 10 minutes on. It was also the easiest one according to 7Sage. Then I got 7/8 on the final passage which I had only 6 minutes to do. Feels bad man...
- sodomojo
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Agreed. I'll take a difficult sequencing game or two and a mid-level grouping game. No weird fufu games though..... some of them can be pretty easy, but the thought of one when it really matters still makes me antsy.creed wrote:Does anyone have hopes for certain levels of difficulty on certain sections? I think I'm hoping for as balanced a test as possible, but if I had to pick one section to make abnormally difficult, it'd probably be an LG section (or just anything but RC lol)
Definitely wouldn't mind a historically easy RC section. Barring that though I'd probably rather have easier LRs than an easier RC - I'd be much more confident I did well on an easy LR than an easy RC.
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Just took PT 74
90/101 for a 171
LR1: -3
LG: -1
RC: -5
LR2: -3
I feel like a character in a movie who is trying to plug a hole in a sinking ship, and each time that I cover up one hole and wipe the sweat from my brow, another hole opens!
I'm definitely happy for a better LR performance, but ugh RC is typically a strong point for me, so the -5 is rough. I actually got the first two questions wrong on the first RC passage (stupid perfume passage
)
I might wait till next week for my next PT, since this was my fourth in ten days with absolutely no improvement (171, 169, 171, 171). I am fiending for a breakthrough
90/101 for a 171
LR1: -3
LG: -1
RC: -5
LR2: -3
I feel like a character in a movie who is trying to plug a hole in a sinking ship, and each time that I cover up one hole and wipe the sweat from my brow, another hole opens!
I'm definitely happy for a better LR performance, but ugh RC is typically a strong point for me, so the -5 is rough. I actually got the first two questions wrong on the first RC passage (stupid perfume passage

I might wait till next week for my next PT, since this was my fourth in ten days with absolutely no improvement (171, 169, 171, 171). I am fiending for a breakthrough

Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
So how's everybody feeling about test day? 

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
not too sure. one day I'm confident, the next day I feel like I should postpone to neverBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Feeling like ill do well but end up retaking because I'm still not quite where I want to be. So mixed feelingsBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:49 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
+100Mikey wrote:not too sure. one day I'm confident, the next day I feel like I should postpone to neverBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
OooOO That would be sweet. As soon as I got out of the exam (which I will probably do anyway) is find a spot for some Margarita's and some tacos.Pozzo wrote:LSAC call-in: give us a taco logic game.jagerbom79 wrote:OOoo soft tacos are the best. My favorite is definitely Fish TacosMikey wrote:having mine with ground beef. carne asada tacos are good, but I rarely ever have themPozzo wrote:Carne Asada tacos on soft corn tortillas are tough to beat, IMO. That being said, I do loves me some good "white boy" ground beef tacos on hard shells.Mikey wrote:made them myself. I've always preferred soft tacos to hard shell ones, but recently I've gained a huge amount of love for hard shell tacos <3Pozzo wrote:yumMikey wrote:reviewing some LR while eating some bomb ass tacos
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
+180CottonHarvest wrote:+100Mikey wrote:not too sure. one day I'm confident, the next day I feel like I should postpone to neverBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Anon-e-miss wrote:Feeling like ill do well but end up retaking because I'm still not quite where I want to be. So mixed feelingsBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
You guys have this shit in the bagMikey wrote:not too sure. one day I'm confident, the next day I feel like I should postpone to never
- twiix
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:41 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I am the same dude. Ever since I've hit the new PT's (70+) my scores have literally been a rollercoaster. on PT72 I kept my combined LR to -5, and then on PT75 I went -6 on the first section alone. My emotions cant keep this up and down nonsense going.Mikey wrote:not too sure. one day I'm confident, the next day I feel like I should postpone to neverBarry grandpapy wrote:So how's everybody feeling about test day?
- Impressionist
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Hoping for hard LG, hard RC, one easy and one medium LR, and a -12/13 curve. Make it happen LSAC!creed wrote:Does anyone have hopes for certain levels of difficulty on certain sections? I think I'm hoping for as balanced a test as possible, but if I had to pick one section to make abnormally difficult, it'd probably be an LG section (or just anything but RC lol)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Do you think the curve factors in which sections are most difficult? I feel like lsac has to know that most people consider RC to be the most difficult section so a slightly harder RC is effectively the same as an extremely difficult LG. Or if they decide to have slightly harder LR sections each with 26 questionsImpressionist wrote:Hoping for hard LG, hard RC, one easy and one medium LR, and a -12/13 curve. Make it happen LSAC!creed wrote:Does anyone have hopes for certain levels of difficulty on certain sections? I think I'm hoping for as balanced a test as possible, but if I had to pick one section to make abnormally difficult, it'd probably be an LG section (or just anything but RC lol)
- creed
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the curve is just designed to get the percentiles where LSAC wants them to be (consistent with past tests), so by definition the curve factors in whatever the pool of test-takers demonstrate as difficult via missing questions.chewinggum wrote:Do you think the curve factors in which sections are most difficult? I feel like lsac has to know that most people consider RC to be the most difficult section so a slightly harder RC is effectively the same as an extremely difficult LG. Or if they decide to have slightly harder LR sections each with 26 questionsImpressionist wrote:Hoping for hard LG, hard RC, one easy and one medium LR, and a -12/13 curve. Make it happen LSAC!creed wrote:Does anyone have hopes for certain levels of difficulty on certain sections? I think I'm hoping for as balanced a test as possible, but if I had to pick one section to make abnormally difficult, it'd probably be an LG section (or just anything but RC lol)
I wouldn't mind a hard LG if it would balance out and make the rest of the test comparatively easier, but I would prefer to avoid a weird game.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
So I just remembered that the writing sample is a thing. Anyone actually practicing for it?
I figured most people would think LG is the hardest--I mean, if you've done almost every game ever published like most people here RC is definitely the hardest but if you haven't spent a lot of time preparing LG is probably a lot harder.chewinggum wrote:lsac has to know that most people consider RC to be the most difficult section
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login