zacboro wrote:I'm just saying I really don't see a situation where I shouldn't take Feb. I'm not on the same track as some of you. Like I'm a student, and I'm not taking a year off. If I can't get a super high score by the time I need to send in apps then so be it. Sometimes it seems as though people obsess over getting that super high score and lose sight of the fact that the LSAT is just an admissions test, like they spend so much time trying to get this amazing score and keep pushing back law school year by year. A high score isn't the end, its the means to an end. I'm not one of those people. I'm not saying anything bad about anyone who is, I find your determination respectable, but we don't share that same drive. And Rigo notice I said "I don't see a situation in which I will need them all" not, as you said, that I won't possibly need all of my takes. I'm not trying to argue with anyone I just don't like to be called naive or condescended upon.
Zac, I like you but I'm with Shak on this one. I think the term naive was used simply because you don't seem to be open to any options other than what you think is best for yourself and because you don't have as much real world experience outside of college. The LSAT is not just an admissions test, it has a significant outcome on the rest of your life if you go to law school. People obsess over getting a good score for many relevant reasons such as not having to go into debt, to go to a school that fits with what they want to do as a career, or to have the best shot at getting a good job when the job market still sucks. I don't know you or what kind of experience you have, I am just basing this off of your posts from the past few weeks. I'm not trying to argue with you at all, I'm just trying to offer some constructive-critism that may help you to become a little more open-minded about things and not as dismissive about good advice that other people give.
eta: scooped by everyone but I already typed it out so whatevs