June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
- amta

- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
post removed...
Last edited by amta on Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
and will kick ur ass if u fux with her crewamta wrote:she's hot and drinks from the bottle.benwyatt wrote:So sad I missed the pic.
This is what I get for attending a meeting.
- lemonparty

- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:48 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
for you my lovepretzeltime wrote:
Last edited by lemonparty on Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
oh def its cheap for the amount of food they give you haha. good college kid spot though lolpretzeltime wrote:Word. It's basic AF and literally where every middle skewl birthday party was held growing up. But it is one of my dearest guilty pleasuresR. Jeeves wrote:haha i was jk.pretzeltime wrote: Somewhere, as in the LSAT? Ha. Hopefully not I looked like a gremlin yesterday
Also, yes, Border Cafe, why are we treading all of the same paths in life, it's awk
YES called it. My coworkers introduced me to border cafe pretty recently. Their margs are good. And so are their fajitas. Dope spot.
I lol when HLS kids go there for a chic night out and judge them slightly but also I'm happy for them. Future HLS bbs take note
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- benwyatt

- Posts: 5949
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Sweet.amta wrote:she's hot and drinks from the bottle.benwyatt wrote:So sad I missed the pic.
This is what I get for attending a meeting.
Good to know.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
not as cool, but solid trylemonparty wrote:
- benwyatt

- Posts: 5949
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Well that's a lemon party if i've ever seen onelemonparty wrote:
- ugg

- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:30 pm
- rska884

- Posts: 618
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:01 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
nice job not totally britta'ing this oneSmallville wrote:not as cool, but solid trylemonparty wrote:
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
oh fuck yeah I literally ate 1/4 of that at most. will be living off the rest of it for like 2 days. haha. SOLID VALUE ALWAYSR. Jeeves wrote:oh def its cheap for the amount of food they give you haha. good college kid spot though lolpretzeltime wrote:Word. It's basic AF and literally where every middle skewl birthday party was held growing up. But it is one of my dearest guilty pleasuresR. Jeeves wrote:haha i was jk.pretzeltime wrote: Somewhere, as in the LSAT? Ha. Hopefully not I looked like a gremlin yesterday
Also, yes, Border Cafe, why are we treading all of the same paths in life, it's awk
YES called it. My coworkers introduced me to border cafe pretty recently. Their margs are good. And so are their fajitas. Dope spot.
I lol when HLS kids go there for a chic night out and judge them slightly but also I'm happy for them. Future HLS bbs take note
also I've been obsessed with the veggie quesadilla there since I was actually 12 years old. highly recommend
- rska884

- Posts: 618
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:01 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
you missed a great opportunity to fill in the spoiler tags with a lemon partybenwyatt wrote:Well that's a lemon party if i've ever seen onelemonparty wrote:
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
lemon, r u single???
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
babe with a bottle, even your nails are on point. propzlemonparty wrote:for you my lovepretzeltime wrote:
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pleadthafif

- Posts: 2068
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:37 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
STI*ugg wrote:herpes is NOTHING. long live those of you with cosmetic and non medically threatening STDs
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
shit, ur rightrska884 wrote:you missed a great opportunity to fill in the spoiler tags with a lemon partybenwyatt wrote:Well that's a lemon party if i've ever seen onelemonparty wrote:
- amta

- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
looks like you're hover handing that bottle a little bit, nf.lemonparty wrote:
for you my love
-
Hstrat

- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:30 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
What do you figure the curve will be for a 180? It seems less predictable than the curve for 170, but I feel like it could be -3 (although now I'm going to miss like 20 for having the nerve to even ask this)footballlax55 wrote:Since we won't find out the actual curve until they release the scores, the best we can do is try to predict the curve. This is done by people comparing how difficult they thought it was to the difficulty of past practice tests they took. For instance, if I've taken 30 practice tests and have gotten pretty good at predicting how well I fared and how difficult each test was, then when I take this test and think well it was way easier than average/ slightly easier than average/ harder than average etc, I can sort of map out my prediction of which raw scores will lead to which scaled scores.Lnm013 wrote:So let's say the four scored sections total 101 questions. And I answer 86 of them right, meaning 15 are wrong. The conversion number I would use to get the LSAT score would be what?Keilz wrote:To clarify, the -x is how many it takes to get a 170dodint wrote:Think of it as Total Test Questions minus the Curve. Then the scale starts there.Lnm013 wrote:What do y'all mean by -12 for the curve? Does that mean that they take however many you answered correctly and add 12 to it then use the score conversion chart? I don't understand the " - " part of it.
101-12, or whatever.
Since I think this was about an average difficulty test, and the average curve is -11/-12, I'd place the curve at about -12. From there I can look at past raw score to scaled score conversions for preptests that had a -12 as a 170 and go based off of that for raw scores higher or lower than 89 (-12). If I thought I got about 15 wrong/86 right, I'd predict that that would place my score at about a 167/168 (like lawpro82 said), since traditionally an average difficulty test/ a test with a -12 curve scaled an 86 raw score to a 167 or 168.
People just call the amount of wrong answers allowed to still get a 170 the curve because that's the main goal of most of the people obsessed with the LSAT enough to care about curves etc.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Hstrat wrote:What do you figure the curve will be for a 180? It seems less predictable than the curve for 170, but I feel like it could be -3 (although now I'm going to miss like 20 for having the nerve to even ask this)footballlax55 wrote:Since we won't find out the actual curve until they release the scores, the best we can do is try to predict the curve. This is done by people comparing how difficult they thought it was to the difficulty of past practice tests they took. For instance, if I've taken 30 practice tests and have gotten pretty good at predicting how well I fared and how difficult each test was, then when I take this test and think well it was way easier than average/ slightly easier than average/ harder than average etc, I can sort of map out my prediction of which raw scores will lead to which scaled scores.Lnm013 wrote:So let's say the four scored sections total 101 questions. And I answer 86 of them right, meaning 15 are wrong. The conversion number I would use to get the LSAT score would be what?Keilz wrote:To clarify, the -x is how many it takes to get a 170dodint wrote:Think of it as Total Test Questions minus the Curve. Then the scale starts there.Lnm013 wrote:What do y'all mean by -12 for the curve? Does that mean that they take however many you answered correctly and add 12 to it then use the score conversion chart? I don't understand the " - " part of it.
101-12, or whatever.
Since I think this was about an average difficulty test, and the average curve is -11/-12, I'd place the curve at about -12. From there I can look at past raw score to scaled score conversions for preptests that had a -12 as a 170 and go based off of that for raw scores higher or lower than 89 (-12). If I thought I got about 15 wrong/86 right, I'd predict that that would place my score at about a 167/168 (like lawpro82 said), since traditionally an average difficulty test/ a test with a -12 curve scaled an 86 raw score to a 167 or 168.
People just call the amount of wrong answers allowed to still get a 170 the curve because that's the main goal of most of the people obsessed with the LSAT enough to care about curves etc.
- benwyatt

- Posts: 5949
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I remember the good ol' curve discussions.
The most important thing to know about the curve is that talking about the curve is dumb.
The second most important thing to know is that you'll do it anyway.
The most important thing to know about the curve is that talking about the curve is dumb.
The second most important thing to know is that you'll do it anyway.
- amta

- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
NO ACTUAL LSAT DISCUSSION PLEASEbenwyatt wrote:I remember the good ol' curve discussions.
The most important thing to know about the curve is that talking about the curve is dumb.
The second most important thing to know is that you'll do it anyway.
-
Kangaroo_Court

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:37 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
.
Last edited by Kangaroo_Court on Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Nah, it'll be -1, maybe -2, but the curve won't be greater than -10 or -11 so I don't expect it to be terribly lenient at the top.Hstrat wrote:What do you figure the curve will be for a 180? It seems less predictable than the curve for 170, but I feel like it could be -3 (although now I'm going to miss like 20 for having the nerve to even ask this)footballlax55 wrote:Since we won't find out the actual curve until they release the scores, the best we can do is try to predict the curve. This is done by people comparing how difficult they thought it was to the difficulty of past practice tests they took. For instance, if I've taken 30 practice tests and have gotten pretty good at predicting how well I fared and how difficult each test was, then when I take this test and think well it was way easier than average/ slightly easier than average/ harder than average etc, I can sort of map out my prediction of which raw scores will lead to which scaled scores.Lnm013 wrote:So let's say the four scored sections total 101 questions. And I answer 86 of them right, meaning 15 are wrong. The conversion number I would use to get the LSAT score would be what?Keilz wrote:To clarify, the -x is how many it takes to get a 170dodint wrote:Think of it as Total Test Questions minus the Curve. Then the scale starts there.Lnm013 wrote:What do y'all mean by -12 for the curve? Does that mean that they take however many you answered correctly and add 12 to it then use the score conversion chart? I don't understand the " - " part of it.
101-12, or whatever.
Since I think this was about an average difficulty test, and the average curve is -11/-12, I'd place the curve at about -12. From there I can look at past raw score to scaled score conversions for preptests that had a -12 as a 170 and go based off of that for raw scores higher or lower than 89 (-12). If I thought I got about 15 wrong/86 right, I'd predict that that would place my score at about a 167/168 (like lawpro82 said), since traditionally an average difficulty test/ a test with a -12 curve scaled an 86 raw score to a 167 or 168.
People just call the amount of wrong answers allowed to still get a 170 the curve because that's the main goal of most of the people obsessed with the LSAT enough to care about curves etc.
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Bro did you even takeamta wrote:NO ACTUAL LSAT DISCUSSION PLEASEbenwyatt wrote:I remember the good ol' curve discussions.
The most important thing to know about the curve is that talking about the curve is dumb.
The second most important thing to know is that you'll do it anyway.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
totally irrelevantforum_user wrote:Bro did you even takeamta wrote:NO ACTUAL LSAT DISCUSSION PLEASEbenwyatt wrote:I remember the good ol' curve discussions.
The most important thing to know about the curve is that talking about the curve is dumb.
The second most important thing to know is that you'll do it anyway.
also curve will be -6, just u wait and see
- amta

- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
i took twice. i know how you should all wait, im a fucking insider, bro.forum_user wrote:Bro did you even takeamta wrote: NO ACTUAL LSAT DISCUSSION PLEASE
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login