February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!) Forum
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
That question was in my first LR, which was also my first section. Since I only had two LRs, it was not experimental.
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (Now with new poll)
anteater1 wrote:I think that would be the first time in history they used identical stems, it would mean whichever section included that question was ABSOLUTELY the experimental.
Having that said, I wouldn't put it past LSAC to shake it up a bit.
- barrotmartin
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:19 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I'm pretty sure mine was section 4 too. Also call it what you will, but even with all these months spent learning the LSAT I still feel like calling my score would somehow jinx it. That's where my rationality ends apparently.MConchis wrote:Section 4 for me.bernaldiaz wrote:Yeah do people remember what section that question was in? If it was in the experimental then all bets are off and both groups could be correct here.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MConchis
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:31 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I think my discomfort about it comes from telling myself I did poorly so that I can manage my expectations, while also telling myself I only missed a few questions. Choosing a number would make me abandon my contradiction :\barrotmartin wrote:I'm pretty sure mine was section 4 too. Also call it what you will, but even with all these months spent learning the LSAT I still feel like calling my score would somehow jinx it. That's where my rationality ends apparently.MConchis wrote:Section 4 for me.bernaldiaz wrote:Yeah do people remember what section that question was in? If it was in the experimental then all bets are off and both groups could be correct here.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Yeah not going to lie I'm pretty suspect of those claims too.maxmartin wrote:well there are already multiple people with 2 LG sections saying their LG section is different from the people have only one LG section. Again Feb is undisclosed, we just don't know what is going on in this black box. In the end, we got is just a raw score and percentile, we don't even will know the curve.
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Wed May 29, 2013 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dailygrind
- Posts: 19907
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:08 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
There's a post in the sticky about how we don't allow this sort of thing, for future reference. Accordingly, I am banning some people. And by some people, I mean a lot of people.dan316rocks wrote:Does any1 remember if the LR question regarding . . .
I left everyone I banned with the ability to view the forums. I will be checking back in, and if I see that any of you have made alternate accounts to get around the ban I will do what I can to take that away from you.
- dailygrind
- Posts: 19907
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:08 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
YCrevolution wrote:Logical Reasoning Example wrote:1. I thought the LR sections weren't too difficult. Okay.
2. What answers did you all get for the coffee growers question? Ban.
3. I got A. Ban.
4. That's weird, I thought it was either B or D. Ban.
5. But it was a parallel reasoning problem. Ban.
6. Damn it, I knew I should have picked B. Ban.
7. Hold on guys, I think the mods might get upset if we keep this up. Never a good sign.
8. Let's trick them by disguising what we're saying. So, hypothetically, if I were a coffee grower..... Ban.
9. You would be displeased with government regulation of pesticides. Ban.
10. But not price controls. Ban.
11. Is that because, hypothetically, price controls would raise prices and revenue? Ban.
12. It's just a cost problem in general. If you were a coffee grower, the legal pesticides would, hypothetically, cost more. Ban.
13. Whoa, it's just like Question 13 from the second LR section in PT 39. Ban.
14. Guys, maybe we should create a chatroom to discuss this. I started one: tinychat.com/letscheatontheLSAT Ban.
15. If you guys could PM me about this, that'd be great. Ban.
Please note that this warning applies to the Reading Comprehension section as well as the writing sample.
If you are in doubt as to whether your drafted post will run afoul of this warning, do not submit the post. You have been warned.
See the underlined.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:00 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
how much longer until you guys start checking your emails/lsac nonstop?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:02 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
i've been doing this + checking tls forums (for no particular reason, really) ever since i took the test.ampersand5 wrote:how much longer until you guys start checking your emails/lsac nonstop?
- PrincetonBound
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:35 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
We're almost in the single digits of days left to wait!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fatpeopleavenger
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Not going crazy here. I check my email twice a day and LSAC email is never on my mind when I log into my email account (so that's a good thing). I haven't touched the lsac website in awhile.
Seems like I'm the only person here who's not going crazy.
Seems like I'm the only person here who's not going crazy.

Last edited by fatpeopleavenger on Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BuckinghamB
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
That makes two of us 

- wakka!
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I just want to hop into one of these

and find out my score nao

and find out my score nao
- beebela
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I'm hoping a 3/2 release date means we already are!PrincetonBound wrote:We're almost in the single digits of days left to wait!
But you're probably right...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
This statement isn't proof, but I definitely remember that with the older tests. I noticed it when I downloaded the chart of LR questions classified by type- I'd see the same question for different types, occasionally three times. So it wasn't just the questions that used one stem to ask two consecutive questions.anteater1 wrote:I think we'll have to agree to disagree unless someone can explicitly prove those claims.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Also, was doing pretty well waiting until I just got waitlisted at Michigan. NEED SCORE NOW
Anyone knows if they will break their usual waitlist acceptance cycle if you score fairly better than your last test?
Anyone knows if they will break their usual waitlist acceptance cycle if you score fairly better than your last test?
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:49 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Well there's a chance that it will release on the 3rd.beebela wrote:I'm hoping a 3/2 release date means we already are!PrincetonBound wrote:We're almost in the single digits of days left to wait!
But you're probably right...
It has happened before- Saturday releases.
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I am out LOL I was actually asking people not to discuss, and during the process I was also banned 

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Yeah at first I was saying not to talk about it but it got pretty rampant in this thread I stopped caring and just joined in I figured the mods would have caught it a week ago if they were going to enforce it. Oh well, learned my lesson.
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
less than 10 days, the end is almost here 

- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Meh not really. We've only been waiting 13 days. It could be another twelve. So we are past the half-way point but I wouldn't say almost there yet. (when you start thinking that way then the wait feels longer. I just keep thinking it's miles off in my mind and then it sneaks up on me. That's my strategy for ends of semesters, vacations, holidays, etc. It works pretty well.)maxmartin wrote:less than 10 days, the end is almost here
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Nah. It will be the 2nd or 5th. We're actually getting really close. I'm excitedbernaldiaz wrote:Meh not really. We've only been waiting 13 days. It could be another twelve. So we are past the half-way point but I wouldn't say almost there yet. (when you start thinking that way then the wait feels longer. I just keep thinking it's miles off in my mind and then it sneaks up on me. That's my strategy for ends of semesters, vacations, holidays, etc. It works pretty well.)maxmartin wrote:less than 10 days, the end is almost here

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login