Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
-
Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Post
by Rupert Pupkin » Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:44 pm
Alexandros wrote:jagerbom79 wrote:Well.. Another PR today!!
PT 62: 174
I didn't get a chance to do an experimental-- had a full day studying for class.
RC: -2
LR: -4
LG: -2
LR: -1
Over all, extremely pleased. It seems as I made some stupid mistakes compared to usual and I still went -2 in games even though thats all i have been drilling since last PT. Although, I did notice much more ease in the LG section and it was just 1 game that through me off. I am getting to a better true foundational understanding because even though I go consistently under -3 and have gone -0 before, I can crush games most of the time, but here and there is that one change in initial setup or an odd question that throws me off and im like fuckkkk. Nonetheless, improving each day and if I scored 174 on Test Day I'd be super pumped.
Keep on grinding!! 2 weeks out mates (Tech less than now, but still) Lets get it
WOOOT stellar job Jagerbom! congrats!!

Thanks brotha!
ashrice13 wrote:
Congrats!!!
Cheers!
Last edited by
Rupert Pupkin on Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Post
by proteinshake » Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:45 pm
jagerbom79 wrote:galeatus wrote:jagerbom79 wrote:Well.. Another PR today!!
PT 62: 174
I didn't get a chance to do an experimental-- had a full day studying for class.
RC: -2
LR: -4
LG: -2
LR: -1
Over all, extremely pleased. It seems as I made some stupid mistakes compared to usual and I still went -2 in games even though thats all i have been drilling since last PT. Although, I did notice much more ease in the LG section and it was just 1 game that through me off. I am getting to a better true foundational understanding because even though I go consistently under -3 and have gone -0 before, I can crush games most of the time, but here and there is that one change in initial setup or an odd question that throws me off and im like fuckkkk. Nonetheless, improving each day and if I scored 174 on Test Day I'd be super pumped.
Keep on grinding!! 2 weeks out mates (Tech less than now, but still) Lets get it
Congrats! Looks like you've gone over that 170 hurdle!
Thanks! Yes, 3rd one and a steady 1 point increase..Feeling very good. Now just to break 175!
congrats! pretty crazy you didn't have to go through the upper 160s struggle!
-
Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Post
by Rupert Pupkin » Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:47 pm
proteinshake wrote:jagerbom79 wrote:galeatus wrote:jagerbom79 wrote:Well.. Another PR today!!
PT 62: 174
I didn't get a chance to do an experimental-- had a full day studying for class.
RC: -2
LR: -4
LG: -2
LR: -1
Over all, extremely pleased. It seems as I made some stupid mistakes compared to usual and I still went -2 in games even though thats all i have been drilling since last PT. Although, I did notice much more ease in the LG section and it was just 1 game that through me off. I am getting to a better true foundational understanding because even though I go consistently under -3 and have gone -0 before, I can crush games most of the time, but here and there is that one change in initial setup or an odd question that throws me off and im like fuckkkk. Nonetheless, improving each day and if I scored 174 on Test Day I'd be super pumped.
Keep on grinding!! 2 weeks out mates (Tech less than now, but still) Lets get it
Congrats! Looks like you've gone over that 170 hurdle!
Thanks! Yes, 3rd one and a steady 1 point increase..Feeling very good. Now just to break 175!
congrats! pretty crazy you didn't have to go through the upper 160s struggle!
Thanks protein! I know- About a month ago I was really not confident moving forward ( I anticipated the upper 60s struggle) and when I broke 170s I was like oh shit, Okay- wasn't expecting that right out of the gate (I thought it was a fluke), but now im consistently doing it.
Just got some 70's PTs in the mail. Looking to crush those this and next week.
-
34iplaw

- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Post
by 34iplaw » Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:40 pm
jagerbom79 wrote:34iplaw wrote:Whenever I'm reading the LSAT and I see phenomenon, I can't help but think of...
[youtube]8N_tupPBtWQ[/youtube]
Lmfao! Great... thats going to play in my head everytime i see one. Classic
It's the little things that get you through... like when the LSAC has a question where the response is to prevent the argument that being right handed conveys a survival advantage. Granted, that's garbage, because it totally does! Or, at least, I think there were some studies in the 90s about it!
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Post
by Alexandros » Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:43 pm
LGs from A (0) and C (-2 misbubbling and mistake) this morning, then the rest of C, which was new. -2 LR1 (misreading and carelessness) and 0 LR2 and 0 RC. I think LR is going to be the major priority here to test, in addition to staying sharp on the other sections.
I've got 45 minutes until next class so I'm going to go over 76 LR1 again.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Post
by proteinshake » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:15 pm
just finished up PT 74. feeling really good about both LRs, but had a bit of a timing problem on the RC. spent too much time on certain questions but don't feel like I did horrible on the section. went -1 on LG because I had to work pretty quickly and ended up guessing on one on the last game which was pretty tough.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:23 pm
confession: i've never done June 2007 as a PT

-
Instrumental

- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm
Post
by Instrumental » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:42 pm
Oi, I just got another 168. Goddamn, My RC goes up and my LR goes down. IT'S NOT FAIR! WTF
PT 71
LR: -11
AR: -1
RC: -5
Hope the AR on test day is as easy as the AR on this test. Was expecting a daunting fourth game after the first three being a breeze and... nope.
Either the test has subtly changed in LR or my mind has changed in approaching LR. Gotta get back to where I was dammit.
-
proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Post
by proteinshake » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:48 pm
think I figured out the game day breakfast:
1.5 servings Kashi Cinnamon Mini Wheats
A spoon of peanut butter
1 scoop of whey protein in water
I have to bring food in my luggage since I'm staying in a hotel and hotels also usually don't have nutritious breakfast options which is why I'm bringing my own.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
34iplaw

- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Post
by 34iplaw » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:52 pm
Instrumental wrote:Oi, I just got another 168. Goddamn, My RC goes up and my LR goes down. IT'S NOT FAIR! WTF
PT 71
LR: -11
AR: -1
RC: -5
Hope the AR on test day is as easy as the AR on this test. Was expecting a daunting fourth game after the first three being a breeze and... nope.
Either the test has subtly changed in LR or my mind has changed in approaching LR. Gotta get back to where I was dammit.
I tend to find this to be true. I typically find most AR sections to be somewhat consistent whereas the hard section will either be LR or RC.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:56 pm
proteinshake wrote:think I figured out the game day breakfast:
1.5 servings Kashi Cinnamon Mini Wheats
A spoon of peanut butter
1 scoop of whey protein in water
I have to bring food in my luggage since I'm staying in a hotel and hotels also usually don't have nutritious breakfast options which is why I'm bringing my own.
I'm having probably an egg sandwich and coffee the morning of.
this might sound weird but i'm also going to have a bit of dark chocolate because of what some studies have said about it helping with focus and memory. not sure how true this is, but either way if it doesn't, it's chocolate, so win win situation
-
34iplaw

- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Post
by 34iplaw » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:26 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Post
by Alexandros » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:36 pm
.
Last edited by
Alexandros on Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
theboringest

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Post
by theboringest » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:42 pm
My reading comp is becoming wildly inconsistent, anywhere between -0 and -4, and it's really frustrating. Not sure if this is a mental block or not but the passages/questions seem to have gotten much more abstract on recent test with some damn tricky answers.
Plus side, LR is still pretty decent with my weakness still weaken questions...
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Post
by 20170322 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:50 pm
So excited. Never in a million years did I think Harvard would be a realistic option.
-
ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Post
by ashrice13 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:52 pm
TheMikey wrote:
this might sound weird but i'm also going to have a bit of dark chocolate because of what some studies have said about it helping with focus and memory. not sure how true this is, but either way if it doesn't, it's chocolate, so win win situation
You've just changed my whole game day plan.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:08 pm
SweetTort wrote:
So excited. Never in a million years did I think Harvard would be a realistic option.
you got this bro, i believe in you

-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:08 pm
ashrice13 wrote:TheMikey wrote:
this might sound weird but i'm also going to have a bit of dark chocolate because of what some studies have said about it helping with focus and memory. not sure how true this is, but either way if it doesn't, it's chocolate, so win win situation
You've just changed my whole game day plan.

-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Post
by 20170322 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:09 pm
Tbh I'm really excited about the option of spending 3 more years in dorms if i go to Harvard.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:10 pm
when does cooley's stats come out. i hope their median lsat went down
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Post
by proteinshake » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:13 pm
SweetTort wrote:Tbh I'm really excited about the option of spending 3 more years in dorms if i go to Harvard.
aren't the on-campus options for law students just apartments?? I hate dorms.
-
20170322

- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Post
by 20170322 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:14 pm
proteinshake wrote:SweetTort wrote:Tbh I'm really excited about the option of spending 3 more years in dorms if i go to Harvard.
aren't the on-campus options for law students just apartments?? I hate dorms.
The Gropius complex seems dorm-ish, tho idk if they meet the technical definition of dorms.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Post
by Alexandros » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:16 pm
Test center just changed. Now it's at my uni. What even.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Post
by Mikey » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:18 pm
Alexandros wrote:Test center just changed. Now it's at my uni. What even.
it changed on its own???
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login