The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:56 pm

Post removed.

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:17 pm

thriller1122 · Post by **thriller1122** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:18 pm

Haha that poll though... I've got 50 hour work weeks, working out, classes for work, and I'm working on my masters. I will drink a beer to celebrate in 2024. If you are not in the same boat as me, enjoy it! It's going to get pretty busy here soon,

thriller1122 · Post by **thriller1122** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:52 pm

BTW, what is shitpoasting? I'm not hip with the lingo...

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:58 pm

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:11 pm

Post removed.

sunsrule17 · Post by **sunsrule17** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:18 pm

thriller1122 wrote:BTW, what is shitpoasting? I'm not hip with the lingo...

I'd like to second this question

JessiCAL · Post by **JessiCAL** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:33 pm

Hi Everyone,

Do we also get to see how many Q's we got right/wrong on the experimental section (just to see how well we did, for giggles). I had exp. LG (and apparently like many others, killed that section, but suffered on the real LG...) Thanks!

hokie6260 · Post by **hokie6260** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:35 pm

Looking for some enlightment...I am confused on how the curve affects scores. Does just affect those with 170+ scores, or if there is a decent curve of -12 lets say, will it also help those in the 160s or even 150s worse case scenario?

Excuse my ignorance, but my prep books never taught on the curve theory!

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:39 pm

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:40 pm

sunsrule17 wrote:
thriller1122 wrote:BTW, what is shitpoasting? I'm not hip with the lingo...
I'd like to second this question

Shitpoasting is the reason my post count is over 1k. Basically off topic posts, which is usually not encouraged in the on-topics but waiters threads are given some leeway

Merp · Post by **Merp** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:41 pm

amd3_3 wrote:
Merp wrote:For people with LR-RC-LR-LR-LG, I am sure my first LR was real (babbling babies), but am stuck on whether my second or third LR was real. I'm pretty sure there was a question about salt and gourmet chefs in the third LR section, and am pretty sure this is my experimental section. Can anyone confirm whether they think their third LR (fourth section) was the experimental and had this question? Thanks
Was your first LR a 26 questions or 25 questions? I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and I had Babbling Babies as well. I think, however, this was in my first section of 26, which means it's definitely experimental. Where was your 26 question section or were you 25-25-25?

If you were 25-25-25, this could mean that there were multiple experimental AND the experimental order changes (i.e. your first section was babbling babies at 25 questions), which would mean that any 26 question was the experimental. If, however, you were 26-25-25 AND babbling babies was your 26 question section, it was experimental.

Sorry, you're confusing me. They wouldn't put the babies question in an experimental section because it was a real question... So I know that section 1 for me was real. I am confused about whether my third LR (section 4) is experimental and all I can remember is that there was a question about salt/ genuine cooking and maybe a question on head butting dinosaurs in this section. Can anyone confirm that this is experimental?

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:41 pm

JessiCAL wrote:Hi Everyone,

Do we also get to see how many Q's we got right/wrong on the experimental section (just to see how well we did, for giggles). I had exp. LG (and apparently like many others, killed that section, but suffered on the real LG...) Thanks!

experimental sections are non-disclosed, including raw score results. some say this is because lsac uses the data to structure future sections for lsat administrations; others say their employees ration the experimental sections into small digestible portions to sustain their subsistence diets during the long periods between each testing date.

texasellewoods · Post by **texasellewoods** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:44 pm

Rjik wrote:
ChillTomG wrote:
Rjik wrote:
ChillTomG wrote:
Merp wrote:I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

I though the third LR (the fourth section) was the hardest. Does anyone remember having a question about salt and gourmet cooks? This was in the third LR section and I hope this is expirimental!
No memory of that one.
Do you remember anything about a mentor in one of the LR sections?
No, but if you could be more specific that might trigger a memory!! Also I had an experimental LR section so there is a chance we overlapped.
Is was something like some critics were saying a writer was not as good as his mentor and give two reasons why... Does that ring a bell? For anyone that didn't have LR as a experimental?

I deff remember that one - it kinda tripped me up. I think I got it down to two and did my best guess. I didnt have an LR exp so it was a real section.

texasellewoods · Post by **texasellewoods** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:48 pm

ChillTomG wrote:
zacboro wrote:
Do proctors have knowledge of this? I had no idea.
She was reading off of her official instructions, so it must have been something LSAC publishes.

I always wondered why it takes more than a week and a half to release scores. (What is the holdup besides the mail and cancellations?)

On the LSAC website it says July 7th - is that just the absolute latest day they send out? I would really really like for it not to be that late haha

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:50 pm

Post removed.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:59 pm

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:02 pm

kevgogators · Post by **kevgogators** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:03 pm

Alright so random ass question...

I was invited to join the Phi Kappa Phi honor society. I usually wipe my ass w/ those emails but apparently this one is actually a respectable one? I know PBK is considered the Mr. Big Dick, but is PKP worth joining or nah?

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:03 pm

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:04 pm

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:05 pm

kevgogators wrote:Alright so random ass question...

I was invited to join the Phi Kappa Phi honor society. I usually wipe my ass w/ those emails but apparently this one is actually a respectable one? I know PBK is considered the Mr. Big Dick, but is PKP worth joining or nah?

spend the money you would use to pay whatever fee they require to join and buy yourself something nice

tedofsandimas · Post by **tedofsandimas** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:06 pm

whacka wrote:
zacboro wrote:
whacka wrote:
Merp wrote:
Sorry, you're confusing me. They wouldn't put the babies question in an experimental section because it was a real question... So I know that section 1 for me was real. I am confused about whether my third LR (section 4) is experimental and all I can remember is that there was a question about salt/ genuine cooking and maybe a question on head butting dinosaurs in this section. Can anyone confirm that this is experimental?
That section is confirmed experimental. Some examples of real questions that might help you gauge which sections were real:

babbling babies
planet orbits
life on the moon
prosecutor choosing to press charges
farming and phases of the moon
rockets with long/short nozzles
Whacka how do you know these questions were all real? I'll add them to the OP if you're sure.
I had LG experimental but I remember doing all of them, so they had to be real

I'd like to second this because I had RC experimental and I also remember all of these.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:09 pm

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:09 pm

how about coffee and tea and response time. real or exp?