The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:10 pm

Sera Numquam wrote:RC
LR
LR
LG
LR

I feel good about this test. How are other people feeling?

I had the same setup. Feel good and I feel they gave away our expirimental section.

mist4bison · Post by **mist4bison** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:11 pm

Any funny stories?

I was that girl that came back from break late. Two stalls for 5 classes with maybe 15-/+ females each is ridiculous!!!!!

Also overheard a guy asking right before we walked into the room "wait, so does it go sufficient TO necessary or necessary TO sufficient??" i had talked to him before the test and he said "if I don't like my score I just won't go. It's my second time taking it. I made a clerical error in undergrad"

gatesome · Post by **gatesome** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:11 pm

Sera Numquam wrote:RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 25
LG - 23
LR - 26

I feel good about this test. How are other people feeling?

I had this exact sequence. Edited in question numbers.

The bold one without ostriches was experimental. (Can't recall if it was second or third).

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:12 pm

OP, can we get some polls going? Predicted score or something humorous?

mornincounselor · Post by **mornincounselor** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:12 pm

Post removed.

rmye87 · Post by **rmye87** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:13 pm

K i had

RC-LR-LR-LG-LR

thats the worst run out i preferred going into it. i would have taken any order and any amount of sections except 3 logical reasoning sections. oh well.

also its the toughest to remember which one was experimental. its easier to remember and compare with others RC and LG experimentals.

the RC was probably top 2 easiest RC i have ever encountered.

LG - game one was easy, magazine game seemed okay i wouldn't be surprised if i missed a couple answers, probably got one wrong max, 3rd game i started but got stuck, skipped to 4th game which was super easy.

i went back to game 3 and i think the key to that game was the relationship between LL and GG

gatesome · Post by **gatesome** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:14 pm

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:14 pm

gatesome wrote:
Sera Numquam wrote:RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 25
LG - 23
LR - 26

I feel good about this test. How are other people feeling?
I had this exact sequence. Edited in question numbers.

The bold one without ostriches was experimental. (Can't recall if it was second or third).

I had the same sequence and the first lr had 26 for me and it was the expirimental I believe.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:14 pm

mist4bison wrote:Any funny stories?

I was that girl that came back from break late. Two stalls for 5 classes with maybe 15-/+ females each is ridiculous!!!!!

Also overheard a guy asking right before we walked into the room "wait, so does it go sufficient TO necessary or necessary TO sufficient??" i had talked to him before the test and he said "if I don't like my score I just won't go. It's my second time taking it. I made a clerical error in undergrad"

Before we started I looked over at the dude next to me and saw that he had absolutely nothing with him except a single yellow pencil. And it was broken. Lol.

I overheard someone say that their friend was "very smart" on the grounds that he received a 163.

Other than that it was orderly and boring. Which I guess is a good thing.

pittsburghpirates · Post by **pittsburghpirates** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:15 pm

Post removed.

C.g.19 · Post by **C.g.19** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:15 pm

Thought the test went well.

3 LR's

Game- magazines( lifestyle, etc.)

RC- Beethoven, Wampum(?)

Two of my LR's were really easy, third was slightly difficult. Hoping that the difficult one was the experimental. Can't remember which LR questions mentioned already on this forum were on which though.

Anyone else concerned that everyone seems to think they did well and it'll be a really tough curve?

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:16 pm

mornincounselor wrote:I think I can do game three properly from memory now. Ugh. So sick.

Hows people's thoughts on LR?

Apparently the ostrich thing is true. I don't want to say anything more, lest they bring out the banhammer, but I googled it and it seems reasonable, which is surprising.

gatesome · Post by **gatesome** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:16 pm

RZ5646 wrote:
mist4bison wrote:I overheard someone say that their friend was "very smart" on the grounds that he received a 163.

IMO, compared to the general population, if you got a 163 on the LSAT, you are very smart.

Sera Numquam · Post by **Sera Numquam** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:17 pm

gatesome wrote:
Sera Numquam wrote:RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 25
LG - 23
LR - 26

I feel good about this test. How are other people feeling?
I had this exact sequence. Edited in question numbers.

The bold one without ostriches was experimental. (Can't recall if it was second or third).

I think it was second, and I hope that one was experimental! Even though I felt fine about all 3, section 2 was the one I was least confident about

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:17 pm

My first thought reading the ostriches question was, "everyone is going to identify this section in waiters as ostriches".

alpha kenny body · Post by **alpha kenny body** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:18 pm

Just left the testing center a few minutes ago. Here are my thoughts: RC seemed hard, LG and LR were easy.

LR-RC-RC-LR-LG

The first RC was easier than the second (Winston Marsalis and Jazz vs. Wampum/Haudenosee). I believe the first was EXP. Games was easier than I expected except for the third passage (morning/night shifts) which I had to guess two due to time constraints. I am guessing that I scored anywhere from 160-168 and the curve will be 11-12. I will updated OP with poll later, as I am going to go have celebratory sex and beers with my lady.

mornincounselor · Post by **mornincounselor** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:19 pm

Post removed.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:19 pm

fips tedora wrote:Just left the testing center a few minutes ago. Here are my thoughts: RC seemed hard, LG an LR were easy.

LR-RC-RC-LR-LG

The first RC was easier than the second (Winston Marsalis and Jazz vs. Wampum/Haudenosee). I believe the second was EXP. Games was easier than I expected except for the third passage (morning/night shifts) which I had to guess two due to time constraints. I am guessing that I scored anywhere from 160-168 and the curve will be 11-12. I will updated OP with poll later, as I am going to go have celebratory sex and beers with my lady.

Wampum / beethoven was real.

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:22 pm

Post removed.

mist4bison · Post by **mist4bison** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:22 pm

C.g.19 wrote:Thought the test went well.

3 LR's

Game- magazines( lifestyle, etc.)

RC- Beethoven, Wampum(?)

Two of my LR's were really easy, third was slightly difficult. Hoping that the difficult one was the experimental. Can't remember which LR questions mentioned already on this forum were on which though.

Anyone else concerned that everyone seems to think they did well and it'll be a really tough curve?

I just spent my entire shower thinking this

Sera Numquam · Post by **Sera Numquam** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:24 pm

fips tedora wrote:Just left the testing center a few minutes ago. Here are my thoughts: RC seemed hard, LG and LR were easy.

LR-RC-RC-LR-LG

The first RC was easier than the second (Winston Marsalis and Jazz vs. Wampum/Haudenosee). I believe the first was EXP. Games was easier than I expected except for the third passage (morning/night shifts) which I had to guess two due to time constraints. I am guessing that I scored anywhere from 160-168 and the curve will be 11-12. I will updated OP with poll later, as I am going to go have celebratory sex and beers with my lady.

The Wampum passage was in the real section. An 11-12 curve would be sweet, but I didn't find the test difficult enough for that. Who knows though, maybe it was

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:24 pm

A few people in my center with previous high scores (including me) admitted to botching that 3rd game. I didn't think I did better than my June score coming out of it unless I killed every other section, which I don't think I did.

chalky · Post by **chalky** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:25 pm

Post removed...

Sera Numquam · Post by **Sera Numquam** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:26 pm

The Abyss wrote:
gatesome wrote:
Sera Numquam wrote:RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 25
LG - 23
LR - 26

I feel good about this test. How are other people feeling?
I had this exact sequence. Edited in question numbers.

The bold one without ostriches was experimental. (Can't recall if it was second or third).
I had the same sequence and the first lr had 26 for me and it was the expirimental I believe.

Mine had 26 too and I hope that was the experimental!

Sera Numquam · Post by **Sera Numquam** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:27 pm

TheWalkingDebt wrote:A few people in my center with previous high scores (including me) admitted to botching that 3rd game. I didn't think I did better than my June score coming out of it unless I killed every other section, which I don't think I did.

LG in June didn't go well for me. I felt like I crushed this one though. Hopefully you did better than you think!