The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread Forum
- Ginj
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:53 am
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
It is done.
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Retaking after the October 2010 test.
Haven't started re-prepping though. Is it too late?
Haven't started re-prepping though. Is it too late?

- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Depends how much you prepped for October and how much you want to improve?applepiecrust wrote:Retaking after the October 2010 test.
Haven't started re-prepping though. Is it too late?
Also, come post in this one: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 6&t=141189
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
For those that are taking the LSAT this feb, are you guys planning on applying for fall admission this cycle?
This is why I am retaking it. What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?
This is why I am retaking it. What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?
- elibrarian
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:49 am
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Hi all! Taking February 2011, applying for 2012 cycle. I started studying in July and have been fairly continuous since then. My study hours per week have decreased quite a bit but I think I'm at the point when only PTs will help. Starting in January will take three PTs a week until the test. Hurray!
Diagnostic was 156 and am now PTing between 169-173, hoping to get that up to at least 176 to account for nerves on test day. Good luck all!
Diagnostic was 156 and am now PTing between 169-173, hoping to get that up to at least 176 to account for nerves on test day. Good luck all!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Come post in the thread I posted above!elibrarian wrote:Hi all! Taking February 2011, applying for 2012 cycle. I started studying in July and have been fairly continuous since then. My study hours per week have decreased quite a bit but I think I'm at the point when only PTs will help. Starting in January will take three PTs a week until the test. Hurray!
Diagnostic was 156 and am now PTing between 169-173, hoping to get that up to at least 176 to account for nerves on test day. Good luck all!
- vissidarte27
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Is anybody else going back and forth between "I'm gonna kick this tests' ASS!!!" and "Oh man, this test is gonna kick my ass..."?
- LSAT Blog
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
People don't usually decide which law school to attend simply based upon which schools are still taking applications at the end of the cycle. Are you really in that much of a rush to attend law school this fall?w.ftw wrote:For those that are taking the LSAT this feb, are you guys planning on applying for fall admission this cycle?
This is why I am retaking it. What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?
Many law schools still take applications (and application fee $) from February test-takers (who get scores back around the 1st week of March).
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that most of the people applying that late in the cycle still have a decent shot.
- risktaker
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
I am in for this LSAT. Anyone taking it at Cal Western in SD?
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
More often than you could possibly imagine. Esp since now my PT scores for the last 4 tests have been stuck at 166.vissidarte27 wrote:Is anybody else going back and forth between "I'm gonna kick this tests' ASS!!!" and "Oh man, this test is gonna kick my ass..."?
- vissidarte27
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
I am. I've heard good things about Cal Western, and I'm hoping the environment will facilitate a good score. Woo.risktaker wrote:I am in for this LSAT. Anyone taking it at Cal Western in SD?
- risktaker
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
haha, think I told you about it. Good luck! Where are you PT'ing at so far? Are you trying to apply this cycle or next?
- vissidarte27
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
I think you did. Thanks!risktaker wrote:haha, think I told you about it. Good luck! Where are you PT'ing at so far? Are you trying to apply this cycle or next?
My PTs range from 168-174. Closer to the lower end of the spectrum, though I'm hoping to fix my LR and tip the scales the other way. Shooting for a 170 in Feb.
I'm applying next cycle, probably ED.
What about you?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jpSartre
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
This post was primarily addressed towards "Those that are taking the LSAT this feb." You're presumably not, because you're an old.LSAT Blog wrote:People don't usually decide which law school to attend simply based upon which schools are still taking applications at the end of the cycle. Are you really in that much of a rush to attend law school this fall?w.ftw wrote:For those that are taking the LSAT this feb, are you guys planning on applying for fall admission this cycle?
This is why I am retaking it. What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?
Many law schools still take applications (and application fee $) from February test-takers (who get scores back around the 1st week of March).
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that most of the people applying that late in the cycle still have a decent shot.
The only advice not being solicited from that group was "What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?" You neglected to answer this question.
Why did you think they wanted you to interfere in their life with your irrelevant advice? Are you some kind of missionary?
- risktaker
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
I haven't taken a PT since I was studying for the Oct 10 test, but I was PT'ing in the 165-170 range. I have used up all LSAT material out there so I will most likely re-do a couple PT's including Oct 10 one and hope that the Dec 10 test comes out before the Feb test, so I can test with some new material. I am applying this cycle, but that might change if I improve drastically from my previous score of 157. I would rather not sit out another year, but if I get a 169 or higher, I might end up doing that. Test nerves did me in last time and I am seeing the doctor to get beta-blockers for this test, so hopefully my score improves a lot.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
This is a fucking FORUM people give advice all the time dude. Also, LSAT Blog is a VERY well respected and VERY helpful poster on these forums and you're being nasty and disrespectful towards him for no reason. He just gave some really good advice that many people do not take into account and should consider.jpSartre wrote:This post was primarily addressed towards "Those that are taking the LSAT this feb." You're presumably not, because you're an old.
The only advice not being solicited from that group was "What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?" You neglected to answer this question.
Why did you think they wanted you to interfere in their life with your irrelevant advice? Are you some kind of missionary?
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: The Official February 2011 LSAT Thread
Don't mind him, he was either having a shitty day or a stick up his ass had penetrated him deeper as he wrote not just an unnecessarily critical but also unhelpful post.LSpleaseee wrote:This is a fucking FORUM people give advice all the time dude. Also, LSAT Blog is a VERY well respected and VERY helpful poster on these forums and you're being nasty and disrespectful towards him for no reason. He just gave some really good advice that many people do not take into account and should consider.jpSartre wrote:This post was primarily addressed towards "Those that are taking the LSAT this feb." You're presumably not, because you're an old.
The only advice not being solicited from that group was "What school will still be taking apps by the time scores are released?" You neglected to answer this question.
Why did you think they wanted you to interfere in their life with your irrelevant advice? Are you some kind of missionary?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login