The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

pleadthafif · Post by **pleadthafif** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:41 am

Post removed...

Mint-Berry_Crunch · Post by **Mint-Berry_Crunch** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:41 am

Post removed...

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:42 am

Post removed.

sollos · Post by **sollos** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:42 am

pleadthafif wrote:My barista = Jorge
Jorge's friend = Emily
Emily's babysitter (for her daughter, Molly) = Catherine Ann
Catherine Ann's dad = Frank (LSAC data analyst)

I have no reason to lie about this.

YOU KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS.

F R I D A Y
RSATAN! A
ISATAN!! D
DSATAN! I
ASATAN! R
Y A D I R F

thatlawlkid · Post by **thatlawlkid** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 am

theugg wrote:
pleadthafif wrote:My barista = Jorge
Jorge's friend = Emily
Emily's babysitter (for her daughter, Molly) = Catherine Ann
Catherine Ann's dad = Frank (LSAC data analyst)

I have no reason to lie about this.
troll in the dungeon

GreatBraffsby · Post by **GreatBraffsby** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 am

Lynnb wrote:Everyone needs to take a chill pill and realize that everything's already been decided

Is that you, John Calvin?

cphtexas · Post by **cphtexas** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:45 am

The presence of the word "Satan" in the Friday rainbow image does not seem like a positive omen...

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:46 am

Post removed.

pleadthafif · Post by **pleadthafif** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:48 am

Post removed...

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:48 am

Post removed.

ffamran · Post by **ffamran** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:49 am

thatlawlkid wrote:
theugg wrote:
pleadthafif wrote:My barista = Jorge
Jorge's friend = Emily
Emily's babysitter (for her daughter, Molly) = Catherine Ann
Catherine Ann's dad = Frank (LSAC data analyst)

I have no reason to lie about this.
troll in the dungeon

I'm pretty sure the information is correct, since my friend Raghav's ex-girlfriend's dad's friend also works for LSAC and said the same thing.

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:50 am

Another day of emails from schools I've never heard of.

splitterfromhell · Post by **splitterfromhell** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:50 am

https://twitter.com/LSATMax/status/657218061682929664

It's today, guys.

Mint-Berry_Crunch · Post by **Mint-Berry_Crunch** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:50 am

Post removed...

schocolate · Post by **schocolate** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:50 am

Post removed...

sollos · Post by **sollos** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:51 am

splitterfromhell wrote:https://twitter.com/LSATMax/status/657218061682929664

It's today, guys.

I don't know what's going on.

ffamran · Post by **ffamran** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:52 am

splitterfromhell wrote:https://twitter.com/LSATMax/status/657218061682929664

It's today, guys.

How reliable is this omfg

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:53 am

Post removed.

kepfd24 · Post by **kepfd24** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:53 am

theugg wrote:I think a 9 or 10 curve. Game 3 wasn't hard. Sure, T14 candidates made stupid mistakes and may have missed more than usual. But like you said, TLS and 7sage takers are NOT representative of general takers. Our mistakes probably won't even make a dent in the average. There's no reason to think average takers make the same mistakes as TLS takers.

If you think -9 then I think you didn't take nearly as many PTs as I did, haha. That test is not a -9 and I think -10 very unlikely.

sollos · Post by **sollos** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:54 am

IS THIS WHY SPIVEY IS HERE TODAY?

Anyone know when the first scores get released? Like, if no one's reported hearing by noon, can we go ahead and determine that today is not the day?

Mint-Berry_Crunch · Post by **Mint-Berry_Crunch** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:54 am

Post removed...

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:54 am

Post removed.

splitterfromhell · Post by **splitterfromhell** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:54 am

theugg wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:https://twitter.com/LSATMax/status/657218061682929664

It's today, guys.
what??? this doesn't seem like a great source

OK, I'm sorry it isn't the LSAC itself. But it's a company putting its reputation on the line that today's the day. So I think it might be today.

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:55 am

kepfd24 wrote:
theugg wrote:I think a 9 or 10 curve. Game 3 wasn't hard. Sure, T14 candidates made stupid mistakes and may have missed more than usual. But like you said, TLS and 7sage takers are NOT representative of general takers. Our mistakes probably won't even make a dent in the average. There's no reason to think average takers make the same mistakes as TLS takers.
If you think -9 then I think you didn't take nearly as many PTs as I did, haha. That test is not a -9 and I think -10 very unlikely.

I took nearly every PT and my immediate reaction was -9 leaving the test. It was an easy test.