The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS Forum
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
It is so difficult to focus when your neighbors are busy prepping for Ramadan and all the delicious smells are wafting in. Suddenly have all of the study time munchies.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
just went through the Relative Ordering Cambridge pack and went -0 on the whole thing. granted, every game was only level 1 or 2 on the difficulty scale and there were only 7 of them!
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Two things...
Main thing: When blind reviewing, is it wise to go over answers that you sort of just knew and picked? i.e. you recognized a strong inference... best example I can think off of the top of my head is in the spoiler. Not the actual question, but I don't want to give anyone hints who hasn't gotten to it yet!
June 2005 Questions 17-22 - Secret Committee - 528-529 Power Score - couldn't double spoil! Don't click if you don't want to know a critical inference in the game.
Side thing: Also, are you allowed to bring in custom mechanical watches? It may be overkill, but I was probably going to be that guy and order a LSAT watch... something with like a blank face with marks at 07, 14, 21, 28, & 35... can't upload pic
... I murdered my cheap weekender trying to take it apart and get at the face!
Main thing: When blind reviewing, is it wise to go over answers that you sort of just knew and picked? i.e. you recognized a strong inference... best example I can think off of the top of my head is in the spoiler. Not the actual question, but I don't want to give anyone hints who hasn't gotten to it yet!
June 2005 Questions 17-22 - Secret Committee - 528-529 Power Score - couldn't double spoil! Don't click if you don't want to know a critical inference in the game.
Side thing: Also, are you allowed to bring in custom mechanical watches? It may be overkill, but I was probably going to be that guy and order a LSAT watch... something with like a blank face with marks at 07, 14, 21, 28, & 35... can't upload pic

Last edited by 34iplaw on Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:11 pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Drilled the Grouping (Distribution) packet over the last two days.
The results: column headers are test, number incorrect, actual time, target time.
PT27 S2 G3 -0 13:25 10:00
PT37 S3 G3 -1 13:23 11:00
PT19 S1 G4 -1 10:36 10:00
PT12 S2 G2 -1 19:19 8:00
PT10 S2 G3 -1 7:15 7:00
PT6 S4 G1 -0 9:50 10:00
PT19 S1 G3 -1 12:44 9:00
PT38 S2 G3 -2 15:55 8:00
PT24 S4 G1 -1 8:48 6:00
PT22 S3 G1 -0 12:50 6:00
PT29 S3 G1 -1 10:48 5:00
PT11 S1 G1 -0 9:23 10:00
PT13 S1 G1 -0 untimed 7:00
PT26 S1 G3 -1 12:39 9:00
PT14 S1 G3 -0 12:07 12:00
PT18 S1 G1 -1 13:50 8:00
PT23 S1 G3 -4 16:48 11:00
PT16 S1 G1 -1 11:26 7:00
The results: column headers are test, number incorrect, actual time, target time.
PT27 S2 G3 -0 13:25 10:00
PT37 S3 G3 -1 13:23 11:00
PT19 S1 G4 -1 10:36 10:00
PT12 S2 G2 -1 19:19 8:00
PT10 S2 G3 -1 7:15 7:00
PT6 S4 G1 -0 9:50 10:00
PT19 S1 G3 -1 12:44 9:00
PT38 S2 G3 -2 15:55 8:00
PT24 S4 G1 -1 8:48 6:00
PT22 S3 G1 -0 12:50 6:00
PT29 S3 G1 -1 10:48 5:00
PT11 S1 G1 -0 9:23 10:00
PT13 S1 G1 -0 untimed 7:00
PT26 S1 G3 -1 12:39 9:00
PT14 S1 G3 -0 12:07 12:00
PT18 S1 G1 -1 13:50 8:00
PT23 S1 G3 -4 16:48 11:00
PT16 S1 G1 -1 11:26 7:00
Last edited by westtech on Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Yet another day of no LSAT prep (3 in a row). The internship, plus workout, plus class, just ate the day. Need to make a more concerted effort to drill during the day-- luckily, the summer will calm down in a couple of weeks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Oh - PS - about to sign up for a Testmasters...
Does anyone need a referral code & I'll Venmo/PayPal you half the amount/rebate [or want to give me yours and Venmo or PayPal me half the amount/rebate?]
LMK dudes and dudettes.
Does anyone need a referral code & I'll Venmo/PayPal you half the amount/rebate [or want to give me yours and Venmo or PayPal me half the amount/rebate?]

LMK dudes and dudettes.
- Doubting Law
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
- Doubting Law
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Can you post the company that would make a custom LSAT watch? Curious to see what it'd look like.34iplaw wrote:Two things...
Main thing: When blind reviewing, is it wise to go over answers that you sort of just knew and picked? i.e. you recognized a strong inference... best example I can think off of the top of my head is in the spoiler. Not the actual question, but I don't want to give anyone hints who hasn't gotten to it yet!
June 2005 Questions 17-22 - Secret Committee - 528-529 Power Score - couldn't double spoil! Don't click if you don't want to know a critical inference in the game.
Side thing: Also, are you allowed to bring in custom mechanical watches? It may be overkill, but I was probably going to be that guy and order a LSAT watch... something with like a blank face with marks at 07, 14, 21, 28, & 35... can't upload pic... I murdered my cheap weekender trying to take it apart and get at the face!
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
So, these were the two I originally saw...Doubting Law wrote:Can you post the company that would make a custom LSAT watch? Curious to see what it'd look like.34iplaw wrote:Two things...
Main thing: When blind reviewing, is it wise to go over answers that you sort of just knew and picked? i.e. you recognized a strong inference... best example I can think off of the top of my head is in the spoiler. Not the actual question, but I don't want to give anyone hints who hasn't gotten to it yet!
June 2005 Questions 17-22 - Secret Committee - 528-529 Power Score - couldn't double spoil! Don't click if you don't want to know a critical inference in the game.
Side thing: Also, are you allowed to bring in custom mechanical watches? It may be overkill, but I was probably going to be that guy and order a LSAT watch... something with like a blank face with marks at 07, 14, 21, 28, & 35... can't upload pic... I murdered my cheap weekender trying to take it apart and get at the face!
http://180watch.com/
https://toptiertimer.com/
I, personally, rather have something with 7 minute divisions [ambitious game timing]... along the lines of...
http://imgur.com/IdLyqj7
just did initial sketch up of idea... didn't really feel like investing too much time into the idea yet... I would just be using zazzle or something else... have to look into that.
Edit: actually just saw the 180 watch has 8 minute marks... maybe I'll order that one... just wish the lines were a bit longer for the game marks...
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I'll most likely be getting the 180 Watch.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I feel you man. With work and everything it can be hard. I started studying in mid-May and towards the end I got really screwed with work and a funeral. I was really upset and had trouble getting back into the groove after I missed about a week without studying very much. Even if you only do a section a day, it's still better than nothing. Even setting aside a 35 minutes for that can be a challenge.SweetTort wrote:Yet another day of no LSAT prep (3 in a row). The internship, plus workout, plus class, just ate the day. Need to make a more concerted effort to drill during the day-- luckily, the summer will calm down in a couple of weeks.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Doubting Law
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I'm going to try your strategy. I have the Ultimate package from 7Sage so I've been drilling from the 7,000 or so questions they have online. I really need to just force myself not to check the answers right away haha.Barack O'Drama wrote:Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Hey everyone! Just signed up to re-take at the September date. I exhausted all of the PT material so I'm going to have to figure out an effective way to study regardless but I look forward to talking with all of you in the process. Anyone else here still gonna be in undergrad classes in september? I'm hoping this doesn't cause too much conflict.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Honestly man, I do it too sometimes and I can't help myself. Granted I only do it 1 or 2 times out of 50 questions, but I really should control myself haha!I will do a hard LR question and then just check. I am tying to stop, but I think it is just a symptom that I am not 100% where I want to be. I think it is just my lack of confidence on harder questions manifesting. I hope once I go through the Manhattan LR I will be confident enough that I know I am good.Doubting Law wrote:I'm going to try your strategy. I have the Ultimate package from 7Sage so I've been drilling from the 7,000 or so questions they have online. I really need to just force myself not to check the answers right away haha.Barack O'Drama wrote:Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
The silver lining for me has been that every time I check it is usually wrong. This at least means I am cognizant of something not being right. Figuring out exactly what it is..different story lol

Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Doubting Law
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I'll be in my last semester of undergrad in September, but I'm only taking 13 credits so hopefully it doesn't conflict too much with my last minute cramming/prepping for the LSAT. This is also why I'm trying my best to get as much prep done this summer before the Fall semester starts.etramak wrote:Hey everyone! Just signed up to re-take at the September date. I exhausted all of the PT material so I'm going to have to figure out an effective way to study regardless but I look forward to talking with all of you in the process. Anyone else here still gonna be in undergrad classes in september? I'm hoping this doesn't cause too much conflict.
- Doubting Law
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I feel you 100%. I notice that when I check my answers right away, most of time the ones that are wrong are because I fell for an obvious trap or didn't read the answer choice carefully enough.Barack O'Drama wrote:Honestly man, I do it too sometimes and I can't help myself. Granted I only do it 1 or 2 times out of 50 questions, but I really should control myself haha!I will do a hard LR question and then just check. I am tying to stop, but I think it is just a symptom that I am not 100% where I want to be. I think it is just my lack of confidence on harder questions manifesting. I hope once I go through the Manhattan LR I will be confident enough that I know I am good.Doubting Law wrote:I'm going to try your strategy. I have the Ultimate package from 7Sage so I've been drilling from the 7,000 or so questions they have online. I really need to just force myself not to check the answers right away haha.Barack O'Drama wrote:Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
The silver lining for me has been that every time I check it is usually wrong. This at least means I am cognizant of something not being right. Figuring out exactly what it is..different story lol
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Same here! Graduating in December. I think I'll just be re-taking some of the more recent exams on the weekend in July and August and then finally retake the test I took this afternoon before the real thing in September. Usually professors hit me with tests/quizzes the last week of September so I'm just hoping I can juggle both.Doubting Law wrote:I'll be in my last semester of undergrad in September, but I'm only taking 13 credits so hopefully it doesn't conflict too much with my last minute cramming/prepping for the LSAT. This is also why I'm trying my best to get as much prep done this summer before the Fall semester starts.etramak wrote:Hey everyone! Just signed up to re-take at the September date. I exhausted all of the PT material so I'm going to have to figure out an effective way to study regardless but I look forward to talking with all of you in the process. Anyone else here still gonna be in undergrad classes in september? I'm hoping this doesn't cause too much conflict.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I didn't really think about using blind-review during drilling. I assumed it was more for PTs. Going to make sure I do this when drilling by type from now on...Barack O'Drama wrote:Honestly man, I do it too sometimes and I can't help myself. Granted I only do it 1 or 2 times out of 50 questions, but I really should control myself haha!I will do a hard LR question and then just check. I am tying to stop, but I think it is just a symptom that I am not 100% where I want to be. I think it is just my lack of confidence on harder questions manifesting. I hope once I go through the Manhattan LR I will be confident enough that I know I am good.Doubting Law wrote:I'm going to try your strategy. I have the Ultimate package from 7Sage so I've been drilling from the 7,000 or so questions they have online. I really need to just force myself not to check the answers right away haha.Barack O'Drama wrote:Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
The silver lining for me has been that every time I check it is usually wrong. This at least means I am cognizant of something not being right. Figuring out exactly what it is..different story lol
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I just started really* drilling, so I am not sure if there's any downsides?jagerbom79 wrote:I didn't really think about using blind-review during drilling. I assumed it was more for PTs. Going to make sure I do this when drilling by type from now on...Barack O'Drama wrote:Honestly man, I do it too sometimes and I can't help myself. Granted I only do it 1 or 2 times out of 50 questions, but I really should control myself haha!I will do a hard LR question and then just check. I am tying to stop, but I think it is just a symptom that I am not 100% where I want to be. I think it is just my lack of confidence on harder questions manifesting. I hope once I go through the Manhattan LR I will be confident enough that I know I am good.Doubting Law wrote:I'm going to try your strategy. I have the Ultimate package from 7Sage so I've been drilling from the 7,000 or so questions they have online. I really need to just force myself not to check the answers right away haha.Barack O'Drama wrote:Yes. The BR method for me has helped a lot with LR. I started off at around missing 8 LR questions per section. Now I am missing ~4 per section. Blind review can be agonizing sometimes when you can't see why you got the question wrong. After sitting there and reviewing it for a few minutes I usually see what I did wrong, and what led me to the error in my process. It is my least favorite part of studying, but it undoubtedly is where I feel myself actually learning the most. Sometimes I have to sit there for 5 minutes examining the question, but in the end I rarely can't figure out what I did wrong. Painful, but helpful lol!Doubting Law wrote:Is anyone familiar with the "blind review" method from 7Sage? I've been trying to get myself to do it, but I can't help myself from checking my answers immediately after drilling LR. Has anyone who has implemented the "blind review" method seen a marked improvement?/ How do ya'll drill for LR? Sorry if this seems like a rambling post.
For LR I drill out of the Cambridge packets. I have been reading the LR lessons of the Trainer/PS LR Bible and then drilling about 50 questions from whatever question type I just learned. I ordered the Manhattan LSAT Logical reasoning and once it comes I am going to go through it and then do another 50 of each type. After I do the 50, I wait until later that day and then BR.
The silver lining for me has been that every time I check it is usually wrong. This at least means I am cognizant of something not being right. Figuring out exactly what it is..different story lol
I think, at least in the early phases, it's extremely useful. Once I start really Pt'ing I am going to put more energy and time into that, but for now, I don't see any reason to waste questions. I guess try it out, the only downside for me has been is it being time consuming, but if you can spare it, it can only help..
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Just took another PT for better analysis of what I need to tackle. Pretty pleased with the results.
Think I will be focusing on LR since it has the most potential to translate into points.
I'm still trying to figure out a way to get all of the materials I have at home over to where I am now, but I do have PS LR, so I'll be doing that for now.
Think I will be focusing on LR since it has the most potential to translate into points.
I'm still trying to figure out a way to get all of the materials I have at home over to where I am now, but I do have PS LR, so I'll be doing that for now.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Yeah, gonna hop back on the prep-train today. It's hard to stay committed when the test is so far off, but every day counts.Barack O'Drama wrote:I feel you man. With work and everything it can be hard. I started studying in mid-May and towards the end I got really screwed with work and a funeral. I was really upset and had trouble getting back into the groove after I missed about a week without studying very much. Even if you only do a section a day, it's still better than nothing. Even setting aside a 35 minutes for that can be a challenge.SweetTort wrote:Yet another day of no LSAT prep (3 in a row). The internship, plus workout, plus class, just ate the day. Need to make a more concerted effort to drill during the day-- luckily, the summer will calm down in a couple of weeks.
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Thinking of getting Manhattan LR. They offer an e-version... love having actual books, but given the complications of getting anything to my current location, I think this might be the best option. I would also get start it sooner and it would be super easy to take with me to work/travel.
It's really not though. There's very little precious time, especially if you have other commitments. Get back on that train.SweetTort wrote:Yeah, gonna hop back on the prep-train today. It's hard to stay committed when the test is so far off, but every day counts.
- Gluteus
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 1:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
That feel when you need a 166 on the LSAT to get into your dream school (Canadian)
Feel bad for the folks who need a 170-176+
Going to get 3 hours of LG drilling done today
Feel bad for the folks who need a 170-176+
Going to get 3 hours of LG drilling done today
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Waddup people, I hope you're all doing well. I more than likely will be joining you all unless my June results prove my thoughts wrong.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login