Jurisprudence 101, Matilda (the movie), RIP Dave Brubeck, and EPAlawschool111 wrote:someone please refresh my memory: what topics/subjects were the 4 passages on again for Reading Comp?
Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
I feel strongly I would 180 a passage about Matlilda. dang.bruin91 wrote:Jurisprudence 101, Matilda (the movie), RIP Dave Brubeck, and EPAlawschool111 wrote:someone please refresh my memory: what topics/subjects were the 4 passages on again for Reading Comp?
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
There was no such passage, need not worryrebexness wrote:I feel strongly I would 180 a passage about Matlilda. dang.bruin91 wrote:Jurisprudence 101, Matilda (the movie), RIP Dave Brubeck, and EPAlawschool111 wrote:someone please refresh my memory: what topics/subjects were the 4 passages on again for Reading Comp?

-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Worm, they need Derp-Assistance.Wormfather wrote:I know I'm late, but the Dec Waiters wish you all the best. Relax, drink heavily and enjoy the panic when it happens. I'm hoping for a median score of 174 ITT.
Signed,
The People's OP
- Eli
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
I also waited in December. Kind of dropped the thread, though, when banhammer hit. How'd your cycle turn out, Worm?Wormfather wrote:I know I'm late, but the Dec Waiters wish you all the best. Relax, drink heavily and enjoy the panic when it happens. I'm hoping for a median score of 174 ITT.
Signed,
The People's OP
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Eli
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Wow, congratulations, Worm!! Best of luck on the rest:)Wormfather wrote:
I landed a fully at UVA and an acceptance at H, still waiting on Yale, SLS, CCN. Feeling good either way
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Just went to watch netflix and the first show under the "Popular on Netflix" section was House of Cards. I choose to believe it is because of this thread suggesting it to all the TLSers 

- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
11 days...
The wait continues.
The wait continues.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Past halfway...finnandjake2 wrote:11 days...
The wait continues.
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Can these days fly by pleaseeeeeeews81086n wrote:Past halfway...finnandjake2 wrote:11 days...
The wait continues.
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
NINE DAYS
not counting today or the 6th.
BUHHHHHHHHHHHHH
not counting today or the 6th.

BUHHHHHHHHHHHHH
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Only a week if it's released at the earliest plausible date!OliveBC wrote:NINE DAYS
not counting today or the 6th.
![]()
BUHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Only a week if it's released at the earliest plausible date!OliveBC wrote:NINE DAYS
not counting today or the 6th.
![]()
BUHHHHHHHHHHHHH
YOU KNOW THAT'S RIGHT
anybody else super pumped for the Psych season premiere Wednesday?
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Still got a feeling we're dealing with a release date after March 6
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
ws81086n wrote:Still got a feeling we're dealing with a release date after March 6
nope.
nope.nope.nope.nooooo
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
this thread makes me so anxious
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
+1TheThriller wrote:this thread makes me so anxious
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Will be updating Poll shortly to aid in this processWormfather wrote:alas, the transition from curve prediction to release date prediction and nail biting.
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Out of curiosity/mostly boredom, what is the lowest score you guys could get and would probably not retake?
For me the lowest would be a 165. (I know I want to practice in a particular region and this score would get me into the big state school there with most likely substantial scholarship $$)
For me the lowest would be a 165. (I know I want to practice in a particular region and this score would get me into the big state school there with most likely substantial scholarship $$)
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Well, I'm retaking a 167 from June. It's objectively "dumb" not to max out your retakes if you think you can do better. So for me, I will retake again if I am sub 170.OliveBC wrote:Out of curiosity/mostly boredom, what is the lowest score you guys could get and would probably not retake?
For me the lowest would be a 165. (I know I want to practice in a particular region and this score would get me into the big state school there with most likely substantial scholarship $$)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
definitely agree with this, just hypothetically if you didn't think you could possibly prep more than you had for the feb testTheThriller wrote:Well, I'm retaking a 167 from June. It's objectively "dumb" not to max out your retakes if you think you can do better. So for me, I will retake again if I am sub 170.OliveBC wrote:Out of curiosity/mostly boredom, what is the lowest score you guys could get and would probably not retake?
For me the lowest would be a 165. (I know I want to practice in a particular region and this score would get me into the big state school there with most likely substantial scholarship $$)
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
I'm retaking at 163 or less.
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
Still sub 170. When it comes down to retake, it's less about the hours and more about sharpening how you perceive each question.OliveBC wrote:definitely agree with this, just hypothetically if you didn't think you could possibly prep more than you had for the feb testTheThriller wrote:Well, I'm retaking a 167 from June. It's objectively "dumb" not to max out your retakes if you think you can do better. So for me, I will retake again if I am sub 170.OliveBC wrote:Out of curiosity/mostly boredom, what is the lowest score you guys could get and would probably not retake?
For me the lowest would be a 165. (I know I want to practice in a particular region and this score would get me into the big state school there with most likely substantial scholarship $$)
Before the Feb test I was scoring 175+ average on my PTs. Drilling wasn't about understanding anymore. For about 23 out of 25 LR prompts, I could look at the questions and know the answer because the correct one "sounded" right. I just knew what they exactly what LSAC was looking for (those other 2/3 questions took a little more thought though) and I knew what the right answer would be. If I score sub 170 on this test it will because the rule I misdiagrammed on the LG section.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)
I also plan on retaking if I don't hit a 170, as I definitely could have spent a lot more time studying.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login