The Official December 2014 Study Group Forum

mornincounselor · Post by **mornincounselor** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:48 pm

Post removed.

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:49 pm

schmelling wrote:
unodostres wrote:PT72

lets go
that test is kinda fun honestly.

I reported this post

GreenTee · Post by **GreenTee** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:50 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
schmelling wrote:
unodostres wrote:PT72

lets go
that test is kinda fun honestly.
I reported this post

unodostres · Post by **unodostres** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 5:48 pm

168
-9 lr split
-6 (3 in tax)
-1

missed a couple early in my last lr section and that tax one wasnt complicated just time issue. ebut what the fuck do i know anymore lsat what the fuck do i know

unodostres · Post by **unodostres** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:09 pm

I think I'll play some battlefield and kill shit

mist4bison · Post by **mist4bison** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:23 pm

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:40 pm

mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.

We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.

dasani13 · Post by **dasani13** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:44 pm

nlee10 wrote:
mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.
We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.

have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:50 pm

dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?

I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.

dasani13 · Post by **dasani13** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:56 pm

nlee10 wrote:
dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?
I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.

lol yeah, I had forgotten how much drilling LR and re-reading the Trainer helps. I think that was my biggest mistake during Sept. prep.

secadc11 · Post by **secadc11** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:04 pm

dasani13 wrote:
nlee10 wrote:
dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?
I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.

lol yeah, I had forgotten how much drilling LR and re-reading the Trainer helps. I think that was my biggest mistake during Sept. prep.

Pathetically excited to read those chapters... I am also worst at NA and am planning on reading the corresponding info in the Trainer and drilling NA tonight. I never used the Trainer before this round of prep and am pretty impressed with it thus far.

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:15 pm

unodostres wrote:I think I'll play some battlefield and kill shit

Word

Smallville · Post by **Smallville** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:22 pm

nlee10 wrote:
mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.
We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.

I think its about that time to start on the RC grind... which I realllllyyyy don't wanna do lol
+Flaw LR... for some reason they give me issues

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:36 pm

Jgoods wrote: I think its about that time to start on the RC grind... which I realllllyyyy don't wanna do lol
+Flaw LR... for some reason they give me issues

haha, I feel like LR Flaw Q's are either really easy to spot or really hard to spot/AC reworded very confusingly.

ETA: Just did 60 Assumptions (40 Necessary 20 Sufficient). My brain hurts.

mist4bison · Post by **mist4bison** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:43 pm

pta · Post by **pta** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:05 pm

Post removed...

unodostres · Post by **unodostres** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:08 pm

Why two practice exams in one day. Id rather commit seppuku. And why base it off one exam. You should address why you got that 158 . Then address the types of questions. Then drill.

Speaking of drilling ... I've been missing parallel q like crazy na imma do some more

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:15 pm

pta · Post by **pta** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:17 pm

Post removed...

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:23 pm

Peta wrote:
unodostres wrote:Why two practice exams in one day. Id rather commit seppuku. And why base it off one exam. You should address why you got that 158 . Then address the types of questions. Then drill.

Speaking of drilling ... I've been missing parallel q like crazy na imma do some more
I normally don't have that much time to study and wanted to make the most of my holiday.

I was demoralized because I also did terribly on another practice test I did yesterday.

Maybe you did better on the second exam because you were performing under pressure? Like unodostres said, go over the first (and second test) and address what caused the score.

Which PTs were they, anyway?

pta · Post by **pta** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:32 pm

Post removed...

Superstaranonymous · Post by **Superstaranonymous** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:38 pm

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:38 pm

Peta wrote:The preptest I bombed was 46 from June 2005. The one I got a 165 on was preptest 55 from October 2008. I remember the LR from 46 being unusually more difficult than I'm use to, for some reason.

I'd focus on the more recent PTs (60+) in order to accurately gauge your average. The test definitely evolves over time!

mist4bison · Post by **mist4bison** » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:42 pm