
http://www.180watch.com/
Do you find that you are getting a specific question type wrong? Drill those. Cambridge packets are arranged by difficulty.LSATneurotic wrote:171 on PT 65. Missed too many on LR'( -9). If i could get my LR average down to -4 total i think i could grab a 174 on test day. Anybody have any advice for LR materials ? The really tough LR questions are my downfall
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Same here. I just read my watch for most sections and then I use the built in stopwatch for LG. But, I thought that was pretty interesting.Shakawkaw wrote:Yeah, people use it. I think it's a waste of money. Some people set their watches to 12:00 at the start of a section. I just read my watch.
jw316 wrote:Just finished BR of PT 51, about to do 1/2 chapters in the trainer and jump back on TLS after and then call it a night.
LR1: 15/25 (-10) BR: 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 20/25 before time was up)
RC: 18/28 (-10) BR: 24/28 (-4)
(* Only got up to question 20/28 before time was up—3/4 passages)
LR2: 15/25 (-10) 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 21/25 before time was up)
LG: 18/22 (-4) BR: *21/22 (-1)
(* Only reached question 20/22 before time was up; went too fast on the first game at the end because I mis-read and picked the wrong answer even though the diagram next to it indicates the right answer, then didn't have enough time to complete the last game's 7 questions)
66/100 83/100
Score: 155 Score: 166
"Timing continues to be the enemy." I also noticed both LR sections were heavy on MSS and such types that I still haven't gotten to in the trainer.
PS has anyone noticed any commonalities in the LR sections themselves? Like I know it's only 25 questions but the same way a games section might be heavy on ordering games or grouping games etc. I've noticed that sometimes it seems like they tend to favor an LR question type to kind of test repeatedly throughout that section. But I could just be making that up..
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
Again I'm continuing my plan to finish the LSAT trainer ASAP (no later than the middle of next week 18th/19th), drill timed sections, and take PTs/BR like this as much as possible without just chugging through them to take them. I realize as a diagnostic tool it really is useful to get everything you can out of a PT—and right now for me that's a lot—vs just like taking one today, grading it, and taking another one in the morning. Although I feel like for the latter—day after day, multiple in the same day, etc.—that's fine when you're not missing too many questions on a PT because there isn't much to review after.
clearly timing is an issue. a 10 point jump between timed an untimed is pretty substantial. I will say also- getting less than 20 right in each section untimed on BR is an issue also.jw316 wrote:
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
Where is the real Colonel? Hiding with GT??Colonel_funkadunk wrote:and now i need an advil after making an on topic post.
assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
shameShakawkaw wrote:Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
So, I did no work today. Plz shame me, nlee.
tar thiefShakawkaw wrote:Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
So, I did no work today. Plz shame me, nlee.
Kinda anti-climactic. I guess I'll take it.nlee10 wrote:
shame
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I will have whatever it is that you are smoking and/or imbibing.Colonel_funkadunk wrote: tar thief
It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
Wtf kinda kinky shit are you into, Colonel?Colonel_funkadunk wrote:It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
This is an A B convoShakawkaw wrote:Wtf kinda kinky shit are you into, Colonel?Colonel_funkadunk wrote:It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
There's also this one.IsThisForReal wrote:Same here. I just read my watch for most sections and then I use the built in stopwatch for LG. But, I thought that was pretty interesting.Shakawkaw wrote:Yeah, people use it. I think it's a waste of money. Some people set their watches to 12:00 at the start of a section. I just read my watch.
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: C ur way out
You don't like mine?? Please.Dirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login