Don't quote, but I was with a 4.0 major GPA and unique softs. They don't care about major GPA, but softs and time spent working full-time after UG mitigated some of that GPA concern. At a certain point, your GPA is just too low for some schools, though.Kopetz wrote:mind if I ask what your super split looked like? I have about a 3.0 UGA, so have some concerns on that frontBirdLawExpert wrote:This time last year I was right where you were. I had been PTing 178-180 and I walked out of the test feeling like I was right in that range. Scores came out and I was 2 standard deviations below my mean. Everyone I knew was freaking out because my score was still very high, but I felt like I left a lot on the table. Nothing is going to shake that feeling until you get your first acceptance letter, and then you're going to wonder why you let it bother you so much. You can retake if you want, but it isn't remotely necessary even if you're a super splitter like me. 172 is good enough to get you in the door anywhere, you killed this test.Alive97 wrote:172, one point below my average. Right after taking the test I actually had the feeling I absolutely jackpotted it, but I guess that kind of thing can be deceiving. Word to the wise, you don't know what your score is until you get it! By some twisted logic, I wasn't thrilled by my score at first, even though it's 6 points higher than my Feb score.
June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
- BirdLawExpert

- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Last edited by BirdLawExpert on Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
-
181plz

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
edit: i'm also dumb as hell
Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Last edited by Kopetz on Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Check the first clause of his response broKopetz wrote: Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Also well done on the score btw
Last edited by forum_user on Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Interesting--which question is it?181plz wrote:forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
thanks, edited appropriatelyforum_user wrote:Check the first clause of his response broKopetz wrote: Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
-
181plz

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
pretty sure I am not allowed to discuss test materialsforum_user wrote:Interesting--which question is it?181plz wrote:forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Nah it's cool because the test is public now. Or you can at least give a section number/question number and I can take a look at it too.181plz wrote:pretty sure I am not allowed to discuss test materialsforum_user wrote:Interesting--which question is it?181plz wrote:forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
- EnfieldTennisChamp

- Posts: 177
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:59 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
-
Last edited by EnfieldTennisChamp on Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
181plz

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
forum_user wrote:Nah it's cool because the test is public now. Or you can at least give a section number/question number and I can take a look at it too.181plz wrote:pretty sure I am not allowed to discuss test materialsforum_user wrote:Interesting--which question is it?181plz wrote:forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
Can I get some confirmation on this? It's a LG question; I was hoping that someone else might've noticed it too. The fact that no one is makes me think that I probably am miscalculating something
- BirdLawExpert

- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Thanks for the assist, HAL.forum_user wrote:Check the first clause of his response broKopetz wrote: Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Also well done on the score btw
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
misread "don't quote" as a turn of phrase. explains my -2 on RC. ApologiesBirdLawExpert wrote:Thanks for the assist, HAL.forum_user wrote:Check the first clause of his response broKopetz wrote: Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Also well done on the score btw
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BirdLawExpert

- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Haha no worries, it got fixed.Kopetz wrote:misread "don't quote" as a turn of phrase. explains my -2 on RC. ApologiesBirdLawExpert wrote:Thanks for the assist, HAL.forum_user wrote:Check the first clause of his response broKopetz wrote: Great, thanks. I've got decent softs and relevant professional work under my belt, but definitely not expecting Yale/Harvard/Stanford.
Also well done on the score btw
-
181plz

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
It's section 1 question 3forum_user wrote:Nah it's cool because the test is public now. Or you can at least give a section number/question number and I can take a look at it too.181plz wrote:pretty sure I am not allowed to discuss test materialsforum_user wrote:Interesting--which question is it?181plz wrote:forum_user wrote:Which one? As in, you think you marked the right answer but LSAC recorded your mark incorrectly? Or you just think one of the answer choices is a bad answer choice?181plz wrote:If I think there may be a mistake on one of the questions, how should I express that? I am trying to see if there's something I'm missing, as I know mistakes are unprecedented, but this one question seems incorrectly marked by LSAC.
I got the question wrong, but that's not my complaint. I don't think I selected the right answer either because I don't think there is a correct answer.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
On the bright side, I got that fucking babblers question right..
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
So guys, this LSAT will be the end of my story:
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ayylmao

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
EXACT same boat, buddy. Thought I was on track for 177+ afterward because I poorly estimated how I did on RC. I reacted the same way, too. Some alcohol helped with that though.Alive97 wrote:172, one point below my average. Right after taking the test I actually had the feeling I absolutely jackpotted it, but I guess that kind of thing can be deceiving. Word to the wise, you don't know what your score is until you get it! By some twisted logic, I wasn't thrilled by my score at first, even though it's 6 points higher than my Feb score.
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
.
Last edited by pretzeltime on Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
at least apply to H. they accept so many people you might as well give it a tryThelaw23 wrote:So guys, this LSAT will be the end of my story:
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
proteinshake wrote:at least apply to H. they accept so many people you might as well give it a tryThelaw23 wrote:So guys, this LSAT will be the end of my story:
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
That's true.
There's no point of ED'ing anything, right?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
lol my roll was way over exaggerated as were my intentions (didnt really have any) while some of the posts themselves have have seemed that way, was more fun, and admittedly misguidedEnfieldTennisChamp wrote: Smallville- IDK what to think of you. still creeped out by the post about cultivating flourishing female posters. Wish you the best none the less.
- BirdLawExpert

- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
You too, enfield, best of luck with whatever your next step is!!EnfieldTennisChamp wrote: BW and BLE were really nice today - thanks guys. I appreciate the humor. Wish you both the best.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
yeah I would deff apply, its a solid LSAT and your gpa is that terrible really. I would blanket all of T14 probproteinshake wrote:at least apply to H. they accept so many people you might as well give it a tryThelaw23 wrote:So guys, this LSAT will be the end of my story:
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER
Sick score, congrats!!Thelaw23 wrote:So guys, this LSAT will be the end of my story:
Diagnostic 155, December LSAT 165, and now June LSAT 175!!
Do you guys think I have any chance with HYS with a 3.55 and a 175? No, right? I wasn't even reaching there to be honest but just curious.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login