Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
-
Dr. Nefario
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Post
by Dr. Nefario » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:31 pm
peppermint wrote:RaiderRed wrote:the LOLSAT always gets the last laugh on me
It'll be the other way around in 3 weeks. You WILL destroy Feb!
Thanks
I really hope I kill it! the way I look at it now, this is my third attempt. I went up four points on my second. A few more points means more money, but worse case scenario, I'm done with the LSAT in less than a month.
nlee10 wrote:I decided to take PT 65 tomorrow. ahhhh, not looking forward.
I'm thinking about PT 69 tomorrow or thursday
-
Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Post
by Smallville » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:33 pm
RaiderRed wrote:
I'm thinking about PT 69 tomorrow or thursday
did that Sat... 165 I think
-
Sherlock1122
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:42 am
Post
by Sherlock1122 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:35 pm
PT 68
Score: 169
RC: -5
LR: -3
LG: -5
Haven't scored this low with LG & RC in a while, thank god LR saved me. Still frustrating not being able to put it all together, this could have been a really good test for me. Ran into some weird timing issues w/ an LG game that caught me off guard.
-
peppermint
- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:55 pm
Post
by peppermint » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:38 pm
.
Last edited by
peppermint on Wed Mar 11, 2015 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
JackelJ
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:47 pm
Post
by JackelJ » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:41 pm
peppermint wrote:
Exactly! Plus you're a Raider & we Texans are badasses. This test ain't gonna defeat us, we're gonna defeat it! #remembertheAlamo #TXbattlecry
(I also just drank some coffee so I'm super wired right now)
hahaha I like your spirit!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Post
by Shakawkaw » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:42 pm
Jackel noooo!! I missed it!
PLEASE PW AGAIN! I need to validate the Jackel/Superman pairing.
-
nlee10
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm
Post
by nlee10 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:42 pm
Smallville wrote:RaiderRed wrote:
I'm thinking about PT 69 tomorrow or thursday
did that Sat... 165 I think
Ohh was that the 2nd of the back to back? Saw the curve lol so I hope it helps me.
-
JackelJ
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:47 pm
Post
by JackelJ » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:46 pm
Shakawkaw wrote:Jackel noooo!! I missed it!
PLEASE PW AGAIN! I need to validate the Jackel/Superman pairing.
Round 2
I am super nice
[img].[/img]
Last edited by
JackelJ on Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Post
by Shakawkaw » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:47 pm
DAMN JACKEL.
I THINK WE WOULD MAKE A CUTE COUPLE. DATE MEEEE.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Post
by Shakawkaw » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:48 pm
Also yes, Jackel and Superman would be adorable together.
-
JackelJ
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:47 pm
Post
by JackelJ » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:49 pm
.
Last edited by
JackelJ on Mon Mar 02, 2015 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
GreenTee
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:15 pm
Post
by GreenTee » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:49 pm
.
Last edited by
GreenTee on Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
NL2424
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:12 pm
Post
by NL2424 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:56 pm
..
Last edited by
NL2424 on Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
ilikebaseball
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Post
by ilikebaseball » Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:57 pm
If I score high enough I'm totally down to defer. I have good offers on the table, but if I score highly enough I'll definitely defer and apply first thing next year with some WE under my belt. If its just average, I'll probs just stick it out, considering I have most of my offers on the table already
-
Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Post
by Smallville » Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:01 pm
bleh my arm is bugging me :/
-
JackelJ
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:47 pm
Post
by JackelJ » Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:03 pm
ilikebaseball wrote:If I score high enough I'm totally down to defer. I have good offers on the table, but if I score highly enough I'll definitely defer and apply first thing next year with some WE under my belt. If its just average, I'll probs just stick it out, considering I have most of my offers on the table already
sounds like a good plan
Last edited by
JackelJ on Mon Mar 02, 2015 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dr. Nefario
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Post
by Dr. Nefario » Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:06 pm
peppermint wrote:RaiderRed wrote:peppermint wrote:RaiderRed wrote:the LOLSAT always gets the last laugh on me
It'll be the other way around in 3 weeks. You WILL destroy Feb!
Thanks
I really hope I kill it! the way I look at it now, this is my third attempt. I went up four points on my second. A few more points means more money, but worse case scenario, I'm done with the LSAT in less than a month.
Exactly! Plus you're a Raider & we Texans are badasses. This test ain't gonna defeat us, we're gonna defeat it! #remembertheAlamo #TXbattlecry
(I also just drank some coffee so I'm super wired right now)
I may just wear a Texas flag to my test
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
leslieknope
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Post
by leslieknope » Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:52 pm
Is Cambridge LSAT's website being buggy for anyone else? I'm trying to buy a drilling packet and it won't let me.
-
Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Post
by Smallville » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:11 pm
leslieknope wrote:Is Cambridge LSAT's website being buggy for anyone else? I'm trying to buy a drilling packet and it won't let me.
doesn't look it but I'm not buying anything so could be something with their checkout
-
ilikebaseball
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Post
by ilikebaseball » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:39 pm
my god... i watched 7sage's video about the tricky game in PT40 for literally 45 seconds. Stopped it, and got every question right in like 2 minutes.
That dude is amazing. It literally is 100% in the setup. If I had used that setup when I did it this morning, I'm looking at a 168 on a particularly hard PT
-
m27
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:58 pm
Post
by m27 » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:56 pm
ilikebaseball wrote:my god... i watched 7sage's video about the tricky game in PT40 for literally 45 seconds. Stopped it, and got every question right in like 2 minutes.
That dude is amazing. It literally is 100% in the setup. If I had used that setup when I did it this morning, I'm looking at a 168 on a particularly hard PT
J.Y. is the GOAT
I had the TestMasters course and I can safety say that J.Y.'s explanations put Robin Singhs' to shame.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Post
by Smallville » Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:55 am
so I feel like lately with some questions I answer I tend to pick an answer based off the AC more than anything else. Like it just is exactly the type of answer I would expect (but not in a prephase kind of way, but as a structure/wording way) if that makes sense
-
JackelJ
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:47 pm
Post
by JackelJ » Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:26 am
Smallville wrote:so I feel like lately with some questions I answer I tend to pick an answer based off the AC more than anything else. Like it just is exactly the type of answer I would expect (but not in a prephase kind of way, but as a structure/wording way) if that makes sense
Like depending on the scope and/or how weak or strong the modality of the answer choice is?
-
Dr. Nefario
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Post
by Dr. Nefario » Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:35 am
First day of class and I just realized I have a three hour gap between classes three days a week. The LSAT gods smiled upon me before I even knew I was taking this test.
-
Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Post
by Smallville » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:05 am
JackelJ wrote:Smallville wrote:so I feel like lately with some questions I answer I tend to pick an answer based off the AC more than anything else. Like it just is exactly the type of answer I would expect (but not in a prephase kind of way, but as a structure/wording way) if that makes sense
Like depending on the scope and/or how weak or strong the modality of the answer choice is?
yeah kinda
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
