People usually use the more recent ones for full timed PTs and then use the older PTs for drilling. At least that's what I did but I know many others did this as well although there are some people who don't.cgra1916 wrote:Hey everyone!
I hope everyone's LSAT prep has been going well. I'm actually pretty excited to start studying full-time this Monday! Plan is to study 9-5 M-F (lunch at noon) then light prep on Sunday using the 7Sage curriculum, Bibles, and PT's until school/work rolls back around in August (full-time teacher here). If I begin to feel tired or burned out, I will definitely reduce the study time, although I feel very reluctant to do that.
Quick question: As far as PT's go, is it better to study the older tests, or more recent tests? The 7Sage curriculum requires the early PT's, but i've also heard some say it's better to study more recent PT's?
Will anyone else be using the question banks on 7Sage to drill by questions/game types/section? I'd appreciate any feedback, best of luck with everyone's studies!
The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS Forum
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I also felt like it was a waste of time seeing where my skill level was to begin... much lower than i would like just from trying problems here and there. Right now all i have is the Trainer and LG Bible (which i havent even looked at yet) - just started the trainer this weekend, now on lesson 3.jagerbom79 wrote:Are the 3 you are using the Trainer, Manahttan Series and bibles? And are you saying that I a full (old) PT after I finish the LR Bible, then another one after I finish the LG Bible and so-on, just as a way to give it some spacing? And are you currently still drilling full sections and question-types? in between those tests ?proteinshake wrote:this isn't necessarily the correct method but I'm just taking a PT after I finish each of the three prep books I'm using. as opposed to drilling, the mix of questions in a PT helps me reinforce what I've been practicing while keeping me on my feet for whatever section I haven't been drilling on recently. I would say do the same. after each Bible, take a PT (but not a recent one)! don't look at the score until after you've blind reviewed.jagerbom79 wrote:@proteinshake, do you have a recommendation for when I should take one, using the bibles?proteinshake wrote:take a diagnostic after chapter 5 of the TrainerCoGar wrote:Hey all,
I'm in it for September! Just started The LSAT Trainer and have the Powerscore LG Bible in the mail. Actually really excited to delve into it. Planning on taking my first diagnostic in a couple of week because I want some foundation of the test before I go in. Hopefully thats not a HUGE deal (please tell me otherwise if you think its necessary to take one cold before I get too into it).
But anyway good luck to everyone and I'll be checking back in with progress!
So far, Ive been doing the Bible chapters and drilling using the question type book in accordance with the chapter i complete in the bible. I am following Pithy Pike's drilling strategy for LG, but as far as LR since there is a substantial amt of problems for each question time, im just drilling 15-20 right after I finish a chapter in the bible and then the next day or later on do the next set as I begin new material to keep it fresh. Of course, reviewing and trying to understand why I get a problem wrong and making sure my correct answers are understood and not just "guesses." Is this effective?
Progress wise: Getting the hang of LR and getting 95% of the questions I do correctly, however, time is an issue. My strategy is to make sure I can work through the problems and understand the logic of each question and the process required before worrying about time. At this point, im prob over-diagramming, but I again I think it is initially helping hammering the foundations of each problem-type into my head.
--> I know youv'e recommended it to me before, but Im leaning towards adding in the Trainer. I just initially didn't want to have to many books of content when I had the Bible set already.
Also, I haven't taken a diagnostic yet. I felt doing one completely dry was a waste of time. I was wanting to get a decent grasp of the material first.
It is still all very foreign to me,probably going to hold off a couple weeks for my first diagnostic.
My parents aswell as some friends who have already taken the test recommended to me the TestMasters course but that is $1,500. I have always been someone who learns better with structure opposed to solely self studying (like to supplement the structure with self studying). Anyone have experience with similar stdy habits, or planning on taking this route???
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Out of curiosity, how are you all structuring your LG drilling? I assume most are drilling by type, but how many are you doing before moving onto the next type? And, are you doing a set number per day, or a set time?
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Pozzo wrote:Out of curiosity, how are you all structuring your LG drilling? I assume most are drilling by type, but how many are you doing before moving onto the next type? And, are you doing a set number per day, or a set time?
I'm drilling by type, doing every single game in the Cambridge set. I have to do it under time and -0 in order to move on. I have 3-4 free hours in the afternoon that I use, separated by a short break.
I took yesterday off, so it's time to dig back in!
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Oif! Haha. I don't think I could do 3-4 hours of LG nonstop. Just getting to the drills/sample questions at end of chapter 5 in the LG Bible. Going to reread and write down what I highlighted before going forward. It's all stuff I intuitively get, but it's just a lot of information to retain. Putting names and having verification of what I usually assume in my head being correct is good.SweetTort wrote:Pozzo wrote:Out of curiosity, how are you all structuring your LG drilling? I assume most are drilling by type, but how many are you doing before moving onto the next type? And, are you doing a set number per day, or a set time?
I'm drilling by type, doing every single game in the Cambridge set. I have to do it under time and -0 in order to move on. I have 3-4 free hours in the afternoon that I use, separated by a short break.
I took yesterday off, so it's time to dig back in!
I will be joining your strategy for LG soon [but probably a section worth of games followed by break and a another section...maybe rinse and repeat once more!]
Out of curiosity, how do you prevent yourself from just circling answers when you remember them to be correct or memorizing the set up?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- usaorbust
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 11:13 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
How do you effectively drill for LR? I have the Cambridge by type packets, Manhattan LR, and the LSAT Trainer. Ive gone through parts of the trainer, but for struggling for LR I was thinking about reading a chapter in the Manhattan book and then follow it up with some drilling by that type. If I do that, how many questions do I do? How do I mix up questions best to get a good feel of question difficulty etc? How often should I refresh some of the LR types so I don't forget how to do each game effectively? And lastly how should my drilling strategy change if I am not going to the Sept. test and choose to do the Dec or Feb Test instead?
I am not seeing a consistent error/ pattern in my mistakes for LR questions, as in I miss one o maybe two or a few different type of questions when I take a PT, I do not miss only one type, if that makes sense. Its a bit frustrating as it seems like some of the studying isent sticking that well with me. Like I can explain how that strategy should work for a question, but once I get under the timed constraints of the PT I forget what strategies I should use for the practice set.
I am not seeing a consistent error/ pattern in my mistakes for LR questions, as in I miss one o maybe two or a few different type of questions when I take a PT, I do not miss only one type, if that makes sense. Its a bit frustrating as it seems like some of the studying isent sticking that well with me. Like I can explain how that strategy should work for a question, but once I get under the timed constraints of the PT I forget what strategies I should use for the practice set.
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
34iplaw wrote:Oif! Haha. I don't think I could do 3-4 hours of LG nonstop. Just getting to the drills/sample questions at end of chapter 5 in the LG Bible. Going to reread and write down what I highlighted before going forward. It's all stuff I intuitively get, but it's just a lot of information to retain. Putting names and having verification of what I usually assume in my head being correct is good.SweetTort wrote:Pozzo wrote:Out of curiosity, how are you all structuring your LG drilling? I assume most are drilling by type, but how many are you doing before moving onto the next type? And, are you doing a set number per day, or a set time?
I'm drilling by type, doing every single game in the Cambridge set. I have to do it under time and -0 in order to move on. I have 3-4 free hours in the afternoon that I use, separated by a short break.
I took yesterday off, so it's time to dig back in!
I will be joining your strategy for LG soon [but probably a section worth of games followed by break and a another section...maybe rinse and repeat once more!]
Out of curiosity, how do you prevent yourself from just circling answers when you remember them to be correct or memorizing the set up?
Typically I'll wait a day or two between repeating games. But, even if you still retain the setup/answer, you're benefitting by ingraining the proper steps into your memory so that you can tackle similar games in the future.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Ok - I appreciate it! I find that I remember the stuff that long, but I also haven't been doing game after game so there is a smaller number of things competing for mind space!SweetTort wrote:
Typically I'll wait a day or two between repeating games. But, even if you still retain the setup/answer, you're benefitting by ingraining the proper steps into your memory so that you can tackle similar games in the future.
Welp, break done - back to quickly rereading/note taking chapter 5 in powerscore lg.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:41 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I was the guy started off at 138 last summer; I just scored a 162 on the preptest A, Feb.1996. Taken 1 and 5 points off on both LRs; 8 on RC and 5 on LG. I am becoming more and more confident on scoring a 165+ or even 168 on the September LSAT! Hoping everyone is making progress regardless of where you start!!
I figured what helped me improve from mid-150s to low 160 is reading New York Review of Books; the structure of articles on it are very well-organized and the journal has a very broad selection of topics that are very similar to those on RCs. My school has subscriptions and I'd assume most higher education institutions have them, so we should take advantage of them!
I figured what helped me improve from mid-150s to low 160 is reading New York Review of Books; the structure of articles on it are very well-organized and the journal has a very broad selection of topics that are very similar to those on RCs. My school has subscriptions and I'd assume most higher education institutions have them, so we should take advantage of them!
Last edited by garypaintsalot on Wed Jun 01, 2016 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
on break for PT 14. wow that LG section was WEIRD.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
I am doing the same. I am following the Pithy Pike plan in this regard and for now drilling 2-3 new games a day and then repeats the following day.SweetTort wrote:Pozzo wrote:Out of curiosity, how are you all structuring your LG drilling? I assume most are drilling by type, but how many are you doing before moving onto the next type? And, are you doing a set number per day, or a set time?
I'm drilling by type, doing every single game in the Cambridge set. I have to do it under time and -0 in order to move on. I have 3-4 free hours in the afternoon that I use, separated by a short break.
I took yesterday off, so it's time to dig back in!
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Finally starting to get LG under control. Almost makes me wish I had kept my June date for the LSAT. But now I have all summer to fine-tune everything, so that September can be my first and final take.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
just finished up PT 14. feel really good about RC, LR was a bit tough, and LG was in the middle. will BR and score it tonight!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
To those further along in their prep than I-- how do you treat miscellaneous games? I've been drilling them, but to a lesser extent than the other types, since they are so rare on newer LSATs.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Yeah it kind of sucks, but at the same time you have it right. Make September your first and last because this test is a monster!SweetTort wrote:Finally starting to get LG under control. Almost makes me wish I had kept my June date for the LSAT. But now I have all summer to fine-tune everything, so that September can be my first and final take.
Sounds like you're doing great and just need to refine your skills this summer

Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
usaorbust wrote:How do you effectively drill for LR? I have the Cambridge by type packets, Manhattan LR, and the LSAT Trainer. Ive gone through parts of the trainer, but for struggling for LR I was thinking about reading a chapter in the Manhattan book and then follow it up with some drilling by that type. If I do that, how many questions do I do? How do I mix up questions best to get a good feel of question difficulty etc? How often should I refresh some of the LR types so I don't forget how to do each game effectively? And lastly how should my drilling strategy change if I am not going to the Sept. test and choose to do the Dec or Feb Test instead?
I am not seeing a consistent error/ pattern in my mistakes for LR questions, as in I miss one o maybe two or a few different type of questions when I take a PT, I do not miss only one type, if that makes sense. Its a bit frustrating as it seems like some of the studying isent sticking that well with me. Like I can explain how that strategy should work for a question, but once I get under the timed constraints of the PT I forget what strategies I should use for the practice set.
Same question(s). I am wondering how best to incorporate the Cambridge packets into my study? Today, for example, I read the chapter on MBT questions in the Trainer and supplemented it with the LR Bible and then drilled about 70 out of the 150 MBT questions in the packet. I am kind of wondering if this is a good strategy?
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me from -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me from -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
Last edited by proteinshake on Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Congrats!proteinshake wrote:PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me form -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
proteinshake wrote:PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me form -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
Awesome proteinshake! Congrats on that sexy score

Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jeremydc
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:13 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Awesome!proteinshake wrote:PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me form -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
make sure you track your PT scores in the 7Sage score tracker! https://7sage.com/score-lsat-test/
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Just did the grouping drills and practice sections in the PowerScore bible. Almost 100% accuracy but timing issues. Made a really silly error on one question [misreading], and I diagrammed one question the specific way they did not want you to. It was a conscious decision though that made more sense to me for one reason or another [the language and researcher game]... I think I'll do the next major game type section tomorrow and review the grouping again a day or two from now.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
proteinshake wrote:make sure you track your PT scores in the 7Sage score tracker! https://7sage.com/score-lsat-test/
Just signed up for a free account to track my PT scores. This is awesome for tracking progress for sure.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tuesdayninja
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Damn, good work!proteinshake wrote:PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me from -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group
Crushing!proteinshake wrote:PT 14 is in the bag:
Score 172
LR -1 (2 mins left)
LG -1 (0 mins left)
RC -4 (3.5 mins left)
LR -2 (2 mins left)
reading RC passages without doing any markings helps a lot. I can read quickly and finish with tons of time remaining. following the Trainer RC method took me from -8 ---> -4, though this is a small sample size (only two PTs so far). on to the Manhattan LG book!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login