Overheard at the LSAT Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
vissidarte27

Bronze
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by vissidarte27 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:37 pm

My proctor didn't say anything about writing in cursive. Is that something I need to call LSAC about? I almost wrote in cursive anyway because I had this nagging feeling in the back of my mind, but decided against it because it takes me forever and I'm not even sure I remember how to make all the damn letters.

UGH.

Tainted_Praise

Bronze
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:20 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by Tainted_Praise » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:37 pm

2011Law wrote:
Tainted_Praise wrote:
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
Tainted_Praise wrote:you know the part where you have to write the statement in cursive
:shock:

FUCK!
:? ........... :shock: ............... :lol: ......................... :roll: ...........I know I wrote in cursive.... 8)

These were seriously my emotions when I read that....
lol, I was literally the last person in the room of about 40 people to finish that thing. all that damn cursive tired out my hand as well.

what the hell is the purpose of writing it all in cursive anyway?

lawschoolstudent85

Bronze
Posts: 226
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:10 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by lawschoolstudent85 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:38 pm

tag

SchopenhauerFTW

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:42 pm

I'm totally getting into Harvard LOL School because of this.

User avatar
kulshan

Bronze
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by kulshan » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:44 pm

.
Last edited by kulshan on Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


SchopenhauerFTW

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:46 pm

Tainted_Praise wrote: Well you can tell the serious ones from the rest....Smh...
<-----

As of today.

User avatar
chup

Diamond
Posts: 22942
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by chup » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:46 pm

Everyone calm down. It will almost certainly not matter.

SchopenhauerFTW

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:47 pm

Enough! I'm going to go have a drink and enjoy myself.

User avatar
crumpetsandtea

Platinum
Posts: 7147
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by crumpetsandtea » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:58 pm

Tainted_Praise wrote:Oh hahahaha also, you know the part where you have to write the statement in cursive, then sign your name....

Well..... 2 minutes into that part, this girl blurts out:

"I DON'T KNOW CURSIVE"

....It kept everything in me not to burst out laughing. The proctor then proceeds to tell her to just print it.

I was also amazed at how many people didn't bring wrist watches or some sort of timer.... Well you can tell the serious ones from the rest....Smh...
TBF, if you're regularly PT-ing with a good 5-10 minutes left at the end of every section and still getting a good score, what's the point of bringing a timer? Not having a timer =/= not serious about the test, IMO.

And I HIGHLY HIGHLY doubt that the fact that someone didn't write it in cursive will actually change/have any sort of effect on their score.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Ialdabaoth

Bronze
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by Ialdabaoth » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:12 pm

I didn't write the statement in cursive in December and got my score back on time, but my handwriting is so bad it might have passed as cursive, haha.

User avatar
LLB2JD

Silver
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by LLB2JD » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:17 pm

Ialdabaoth wrote:I didn't write the statement in cursive in December and got my score back on time, but my handwriting is so bad it might have passed as cursive, haha.

That's funny. Probably the last time a bad hand writing would come in handy for you. Who writes with hands anymore these days anyways!!

User avatar
Paste_Me

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:57 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by Paste_Me » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:27 pm

Head 2 people talking about how the LSAT was not going ot be required, and that it's about time because it doesn't really gauge anything.

User avatar
suspicious android

Silver
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by suspicious android » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:33 pm

By the way, I didn't write in cursive last time I took the test, nothing happened. Proctor didn't mention cursive. That word sounds weird, haven't used it in so many years. Cursive.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


tomwatts

Gold
Posts: 1710
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by tomwatts » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:57 pm

As I have mentioned at least once before, I had a teacher friend who didn't care at all about the results who wrote, "LSAC sucks balls," and nothing happened.

User avatar
suspicious android

Silver
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by suspicious android » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:59 pm

tomwatts wrote:As I have mentioned at least once before, I had a teacher friend who didn't care at all about the results who wrote, "LSAC sucks balls," and nothing happened.
Well, since it was an objectively true statement, perhaps they didn't feel they had cause for action.

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by northwood » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:07 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
kulshan wrote:Ummm, yeah, that was supposed to be in cursive?

FFFUUUUUUUU
I've taken the LSAT 3 times now. Leave it to me to screw up something like this.

Though I remember writing in cursive the first time, not the second time, and definitely not the third time.

perhaps this time around you will be pleased with your performance?

SchopenhauerFTW

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:08 pm

northwood wrote:
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
kulshan wrote:Ummm, yeah, that was supposed to be in cursive?

FFFUUUUUUUU
I've taken the LSAT 3 times now. Leave it to me to screw up something like this.

Though I remember writing in cursive the first time, not the second time, and definitely not the third time.

perhaps this time around you will be pleased with your performance?
Image

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by JamMasterJ » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:17 pm

NikaneOkie wrote:along the lines of weird things to wear to the testing center:

I wore a big, bright pink, sparkly barrette with a 3D, wings included, butterfly clip on the top of my head when I took the LSAT, so everyone probably thought i had a major problem.
I jokingly asked my 1.5 year old niece, who could barely talk, what I should wear for good luck to the LSAT, and she proceeded to run over to her room, pick up this barrette and very pointedly hand it to me... so I HAD to wear it lol
Does "good luck" constitute religious significance?

User avatar
gbpackerbacker

Silver
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 12:13 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by gbpackerbacker » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:39 pm

This. is the best thread on TLS.

User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by beachbum » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:39 pm

gbpackerbacker wrote:This. is the best thread on TLS.
+1. So glad it came back for February.

Also, this is the first time I've ever heard about writing the statement in cursive. I don't even know cursive anymore, and it didn't affect my score report at all.

User avatar
Stonewall

Bronze
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:19 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by Stonewall » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:45 pm

gbpackerbacker wrote:This. is the best thread on TLS.
perhaps

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
rinkrat19

Diamond
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by rinkrat19 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:47 pm

I think the old PTs specified cursive but the most recent tests didn't. Obviously someone realized no one can do joined-up writing anymore!

CalyssaT

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:24 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by CalyssaT » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:18 pm

I didn't expect to have anything to add on here, but...

- before we got started, one guy asked the proctors, "So wrong answers don't count against us, right?" Lol!

- during the break, another guy walked up to the proctors and asked them when the next break would be!

hahaha :)

User avatar
JazzOne

Gold
Posts: 2979
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by JazzOne » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:19 pm

rinkrat19 wrote:I think the old PTs specified cursive but the most recent tests didn't. Obviously someone realized no one can do joined-up writing anymore!
When I took the test a few years back, I think it said to write the statement in your "ordinary handwriting" or something to that effect.

User avatar
vissidarte27

Bronze
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Post by vissidarte27 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:21 pm

One lady at my testing center said that she didn't know there were five sections.

Also, the proctor did not kick people out for having cell phones. Instead, he asked people who had them to place them on a table up front. None of the women in my test room had them, but ALL of the guys did.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”