The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What score did you get?

Mythical 180
4
4%
170-179
22
22%
160-169
45
46%
150-159
21
21%
140-149
4
4%
130-139
0
No votes
120-129
2
2%
 
Total votes: 98

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:01 am

splitterfromhell wrote:It's jarring how dead this thread is after being in the December thread!
I feel like I'm the only one who's constantly checking this thing. Lol come on people. Step your obsessiveness up

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:02 am

AbbeyS wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:It's jarring how dead this thread is after being in the December thread!
I feel like I'm the only one who's constantly checking this thing. Lol come on people. Step your obsessiveness up
Can do!

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:05 am

New curve poll to appease the haters

spiffy2

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 6:36 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by spiffy2 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:22 am

I keep fluctuating between thinking I completely bombed it and did average...

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:23 am

spiffy2 wrote:I keep fluctuating between thinking I completely bombed it and did average...
Me too. My mood changes about it every time I think about it

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
azaleafire

Bronze
Posts: 350
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 3:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by azaleafire » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:25 am

Oh I'm checking. I've just been rotating thorogh 7sage, TLS, and Reddit all weekend. Just didn't have anything to post that wasn't redundant until now.

footballlax55

New
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 2:33 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by footballlax55 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:25 am

Did y'all think the LR section with 25 questions was harder than the LR with 26 questions?

Also, no way in hell is the curve going to be only 10.
The average is like 11.5 and this was definitely not more than slightly easier than average.

User avatar
perfunctory

Bronze
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:25 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by perfunctory » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:25 am

AbbeyS wrote:
spiffy2 wrote:I keep fluctuating between thinking I completely bombed it and did average...
Me too. My mood changes about it every time I think about it
Counting my theoretical scores for each section and giving myself the benefit of the doubt so that I can be happy.

User avatar
perfunctory

Bronze
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:25 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by perfunctory » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:30 am

footballlax55 wrote:Did y'all think the LR section with 25 questions was harder than the LR with 26 questions?

Also, no way in hell is the curve going to be only 10.
The average is like 11.5 and this was definitely not more than slightly easier than average.
I thought 25 was the easier one. This may be b/c I had it earlier in the test. I think the curve will be -11. Dec and Oct were harder and they were -12 but this one wasn't a -10 easy given the rc.
Last edited by perfunctory on Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


MiamiHeat3

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:08 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by MiamiHeat3 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:34 am

perfunctory wrote:
footballlax55 wrote:Did y'all think the LR section with 25 questions was harder than the LR with 26 questions?

Also, no way in hell is the curve going to be only 10.
The average is like 11.5 and this was definitely not more than slightly easier than average.
I thought 25 was the easier one. I think the curve will be -11. Dec and Oct were harder and they were -12 but this one wasn't a -10 easy given the rc.
I agree. I thought that both of the 25s LR weren't that bad, and then when I got to 26 I felt like shit got real real quick lol

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:42 am

footballlax55 wrote:Did y'all think the LR section with 25 questions was harder than the LR with 26 questions?

Also, no way in hell is the curve going to be only 10.
The average is like 11.5 and this was definitely not more than slightly easier than average.
You, me, and Abbey felt this way.

I personally believe that it's entirely subjective though.

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:45 am

I took December and thought it should've been more lenient than -12 so I no longer believe there's much of a correlation between perceived difficulty and curve.

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:56 am

splitterfromhell wrote:I took December and thought it should've been more lenient than -12 so I no longer believe there's much of a correlation between perceived difficulty and curve.
This is TCR

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:57 am

So who's going to be the first to picwhore in this thread?

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:03 am

splitterfromhell wrote:So who's going to be the first to picwhore in this thread?
Well that escalated quickly

User avatar
Helioze

Bronze
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:10 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Helioze » Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:56 am

What pray tell is a picwhore

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:58 am

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Helioze

Bronze
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:10 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Helioze » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:00 am

Ar40 wrote:Did any of you guys get a survey question asking how comfortable/often you use Tablets and SmartPhones?

Also, "if you do touch screen computing", and "are you comfortable selecting touch screen options?"

Every other LSAT, I get asked which resources I used to prepare, so this one was a real departure. My proctor also mentioned that he was asked by the LSAC if he was comfortable proctoring a touch screen test. Weird.


(I took the Saturday Observer test, and the proctor was really chilled out. I asked him about the weird survey thing once I completed the test)

I'm assuming this survey thing isn't an issue with disclosure, as it was just extraneous weird stuff outside of the test itself.
If there was a survey i didnt do it.

LexieZ19

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by LexieZ19 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:32 am

theharleyquinn wrote:
LexieZ19 wrote:
theharleyquinn wrote:
LexieZ19 wrote:I had experimental LG. I went LG, LG, LR, LR, RC. RC was hard but LR was fair. Having 8 LG in a row makes it all blend together. I know Paris, Madrid was real, and KLG was real, but do not remember what other two were real.
I'm in the same boat. I can't remember for the life of me whether the real one was first or second.


I'm glad I'm not the only one. I remember one with teachers. But I can't remember what the bookstore game was.i don't even know if the teacher one was real.
I had one with teachers! That was in whichever one was experimental.

What about the road sweeping one??

Jeff62

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Jeff62 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:12 am

Can someone explain the curve to me?
What does -10 equate to?

User avatar
TexasENG

Silver
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by TexasENG » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:04 am

The curve is the number of missed questions to get to a 170. I.e. -10 curve means you can miss 10 and still get a 170

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
TexasENG

Silver
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by TexasENG » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:48 am

splitterfromhell wrote:I took December and thought it should've been more lenient than -12 so I no longer believe there's much of a correlation between perceived difficulty and curve.
I thought the curve is based on how people did on the sections when they were (more or less) given on earlier tests. But it definitely seems pretty arbitrary. I would always try to guess the curve on my PTs and would only get like 20% right.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:49 am

The only time I felt perceived difficulty correlated with the curve was PT 71...I felt the LR had an unusual amount of confusing language, which made it pretty hard. I remember thinking during "This has to have a big curve" and it ended up having -14....other than that I've never really noticed the curve being related but idk

User avatar
TexasENG

Silver
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by TexasENG » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:11 am

Li'l Sebastian wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:It's jarring how dead this thread is after being in the December thread!
I feel like I'm the only one who's constantly checking this thing. Lol come on people. Step your obsessiveness up
Can do!
I kind of appreciate the chill attitude of the Feb testers. Last June everyone was so neurotic it made me neurotic. The entire place turned into a massive blast zone and I was crazy drunk when scores were released. Also, I think going through the whole thing once already helps keep things a little chill.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:20 am

TexasENG wrote:
Li'l Sebastian wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:It's jarring how dead this thread is after being in the December thread!
I feel like I'm the only one who's constantly checking this thing. Lol come on people. Step your obsessiveness up
Can do!
I kind of appreciate the chill attitude of the Feb testers. Last June everyone was so neurotic it made me neurotic. The entire place turned into a massive blast zone and I was crazy drunk when scores were released. Also, I think going through the whole thing once already helps keep things a little chill.
I was in June waiters! And I'm pretty sure said blast zone started when I tried fighting my way out of lurker status to become accepted by the group :lol: haha

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”