February 2012 LSAT Study Group Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by bernaldiaz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:43 pm

Well if it's all good I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and my 2nd LR seemed a bit curious...
I had the same but I am almost certain it was the first section haha. There were way too many of one question type that doesn't show up with that type of frequency. I thought my second section seemed like a regular section.

Also, can we get a mod in here to tell us what we can and cannot do?

OnTheRise

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:49 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by OnTheRise » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:46 pm

Mine went LR LG LR LR RC and the #s were 25, 23, 25,25,27. I felt like the LG really hurt me. I havent missed a LG while doing a practice test in months and i think I screwed this one up big time.

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by bernaldiaz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:47 pm

OnTheRise wrote:Mine went LR LG LR LR RC and the #s were 25, 23, 25,25,27. I felt like the LG really hurt me. I havent missed a LG while doing a practice test in months and i think I screwed this one up big time.
I only had one LG section too and they definitely weren't easy. Had to sort of "guess" on the last question, and wouldn't be surprised if I got 3 wrong. I'm in the same boat as you, have been getting either -0 or -1 on almost every test for the last couple months

Also, let's get some guesses on the scale? I know people love speculating that. I'm going to say this was a -11 or -12. I don't think it was an easy test, but wasn't impossible either.

HellOnHeels

Silver
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by HellOnHeels » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:52 pm

bernaldiaz wrote:
OnTheRise wrote:Mine went LR LG LR LR RC and the #s were 25, 23, 25,25,27. I felt like the LG really hurt me. I havent missed a LG while doing a practice test in months and i think I screwed this one up big time.
I only had one LG section too and they definitely weren't easy. Had to sort of "guess" on the last question, and wouldn't be surprised if I got 3 wrong. I'm in the same boat as you, have been getting either -0 or -1 on almost every test for the last couple months

Also, let's get some guesses on the scale? I know people love speculating that. I'm going to say this was a -11 or -12. I don't think it was an easy test, but wasn't impossible either.
You should make a waiting thread, with a poll at the top for the 'curve' for people to vote on.

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by bernaldiaz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:53 pm

Making one now.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


FinallyGoing

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by FinallyGoing » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:00 pm

Didn't count my questions but the one LG I had was only 23q and my RC was 27 I do remember that.

FinallyGoing

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by FinallyGoing » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:02 pm

OnTheRise wrote:Mine went LR LG LR LR RC and the #s were 25, 23, 25,25,27. I felt like the LG really hurt me. I havent missed a LG while doing a practice test in months and i think I screwed this one up big time.
I had the same breakdown...yeah LG was def (as is always) my worst section...I am only hoping for 75% on it anyhow..kinda comforting to know it wasn't a gimmie section for some ppl...Its the only section I have trbl with.

FrozenCavemanLawyer

New
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:44 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by FrozenCavemanLawyer » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:03 pm

i had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. the first LG was ridiculously hard and i bombed it. the second LG i did really well on i thought so my score will really fluctuate depending on which one was the experimental.

FinallyGoing

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by FinallyGoing » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:04 pm

FrozenCavemanLawyer wrote:i had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. the first LG was ridiculously hard and i bombed it. the second LG i did really well on i thought so my score will really fluctuate depending on which one was the experimental.
The real one had the apartments with cats.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


willwash

Bronze
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by willwash » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm

Sounds like you had about an average difficulty test. Good luck to you all. I will reiterate my perpetual advice: don't cancel unless you KNOW you completely bombed a section. You've all put in enough prep to know whether that's the case.

I've got 9 more months to study...is that a :P or a :? ?

User avatar
beebela

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by beebela » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm

mine went 25-23-25-25-27 (LR-LG-LR-LR-RC) so it's definitely only 100 questions...weird.

MeglioTardi

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 10:45 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by MeglioTardi » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:11 pm

How do you know the one with cats is real, not the experimental?
Thank you

User avatar
beebela

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by beebela » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:12 pm

MeglioTardi wrote:How do you know the one with cats is real, not the experimental?
Thank you
some of us had three LR sections (or 2 RC) so the LG we had has to be the real one

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


MeglioTardi

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 10:45 am

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by MeglioTardi » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:15 pm

beebela wrote:
MeglioTardi wrote:How do you know the one with cats is real, not the experimental?
Thank you
some of us had three LR sections (or 2 RC) so the LG we had has to be the real one
I bombed the one with Cats.... Is that the one you have?

FinallyGoing

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by FinallyGoing » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:17 pm

MeglioTardi wrote:
beebela wrote:
MeglioTardi wrote:How do you know the one with cats is real, not the experimental?
Thank you
some of us had three LR sections (or 2 RC) so the LG we had has to be the real one
I bombed the one with Cats.... Is that the one you have?
Yea Cats was real..if you mean ppl w/cats and not individual cats

User avatar
beebela

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by beebela » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:18 pm

MeglioTardi wrote:
beebela wrote:
MeglioTardi wrote:How do you know the one with cats is real, not the experimental?
Thank you
some of us had three LR sections (or 2 RC) so the LG we had has to be the real one
I bombed the one with Cats.... Is that the one you have?
yup, sorry :(

hooma

Bronze
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:33 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by hooma » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:34 pm

People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


mikefichera

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:08 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by mikefichera » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:36 pm

hooma wrote:People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...

I didn't.

hooma

Bronze
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:33 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by hooma » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:39 pm

mikefichera wrote:
hooma wrote:People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...

I didn't.
Yay! It was in my third section and my other rc was fifth, but after lsac changed it up with the experimental in the fourth section in december I wasn't sure!

rickitick

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by rickitick » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:39 pm

beebela wrote:mine went 25-23-25-25-27 (LR-LG-LR-LR-RC) so it's definitely only 100 questions...weird.
Strange because I had the same layout and I went 25-23-26-25-27

User avatar
Eichörnchen

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by Eichörnchen » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:43 pm

hooma wrote:People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...
I was also LG LR LG RC LR

My second LG had airport layovers and one with sports if I remember correctly. Was that the exp then? I can't remember which had cats...

RC was sand dunes

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


mikefichera

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:08 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by mikefichera » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:44 pm

rickitick wrote:
beebela wrote:mine went 25-23-25-25-27 (LR-LG-LR-LR-RC) so it's definitely only 100 questions...weird.
Strange because I had the same layout and I went 25-23-26-25-27
Me as welll, I had 25-23-26-25-27

hooma

Bronze
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:33 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by hooma » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:48 pm

Eichörnchen wrote:
hooma wrote:People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...
I was also LG LR LG RC LR

My second LG had airport layovers and one with sports if I remember correctly. Was that the exp then? I can't remember which had cats...

RC was sand dunes
Thanks for the rc confirmation, I did not have airport layovers so that was exp

rickitick

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by rickitick » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:51 pm

mikefichera wrote:
rickitick wrote:
beebela wrote:mine went 25-23-25-25-27 (LR-LG-LR-LR-RC) so it's definitely only 100 questions...weird.
Strange because I had the same layout and I went 25-23-26-25-27
Me as welll, I had 25-23-26-25-27
Given that, I think the second LR was experimental.

User avatar
Eichörnchen

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm

Re: February 2012 LSAT Study Group

Post by Eichörnchen » Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:52 pm

hooma wrote:
Eichörnchen wrote:
hooma wrote:People with pets/cats was definitely real. Did everyone have a reading comp re Machiavelli? I'm hoping no...
I was also LG LR LG RC LR

My second LG had airport layovers and one with sports if I remember correctly. Was that the exp then? I can't remember which had cats...

RC was sand dunes
Thanks for the rc confirmation, I did not have airport layovers so that was exp
Thanks!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”