34iplaw wrote:
I'm far from the highest scorer here, so my advice may not be best. That said, I think
you would probably be better off just reasoning through why each answer choice is wrong and each answer choice right. You miss relatively few (like myself) which means you likely remember when you missed a question in most circumstances. I think that makes it less beneficial to simply redo them.
There are a few others that you should learn. Also, recognize that a flaw has to be wrong to be a flaw. There is a *really* easy part to whole question that I got wrong just because one answer was clearly a part to whole idea but it was correct... so it wasn't a flaw. Really irritating.
With methods of reasoning, I don't know why I'm having trouble recollecting them. I guess it's just that they are a lot less common than flawed methods. I feel like flawed ones will help you. I'll have to review methods of reasoning I guess

Ones that come to mind...
positive structure (A->B, have A, so B)
contrapositive structure (A->B, don't have A, so don't have B)
either or inclusive of all situations (A or B or C which are *all* possible outcomes, not A not B, so C)
and some others are just more flat out descriptive/correct methods of argument that are often used in a flaw way...
citing statistical evidence, a valid expert, drawing a conclusion from a representative sample, etc.