The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:51 am

Post removed.

thatlawlkid · Post by **thatlawlkid** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:55 am

theugg wrote:Why is everyone obsessed with cowgirl

I was going for the reverse, misclicked.... wheelbarrow.

LurkSoHard · Post by **LurkSoHard** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:57 am

Post removed...

alpha kenny body · Post by **alpha kenny body** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:59 am

theugg wrote:Why is everyone obsessed with cowgirl

i opted for reverse so i can see dat backside. A > T

brief_little_candle · Post by **brief_little_candle** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:01 pm

i am surprised 69 is not included in the poll

oldercoldervoice · Post by **oldercoldervoice** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:03 pm

I was so excited for a new poll and then this shit happened

LurkSoHard · Post by **LurkSoHard** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:03 pm

Post removed...

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:04 pm

LurkSoHard wrote:
oldercoldervoice wrote:I was so excited for a new poll and then this shit happened

galeatus · Post by **galeatus** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:05 pm

RZ5646 wrote:
LurkSoHard wrote:
oldercoldervoice wrote:I was so excited for a new poll and then this shit happened

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07 pm

Post removed.

TheProdigal · Post by **TheProdigal** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07 pm

I find these poll choices to be disappointingly heterocentric.

RZ5646 wrote:I say we recall Zacboro from exile and make him OP. He was a chill dude.

Changed his name and deleted all old posts.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:08 pm

theugg wrote:Why is everyone obsessed with cowgirl

It's nice for us guys because we get to lie back and not do all the work

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:09 pm

theugg wrote:Tension are running high. . .

Maybe a sex related poll was actually appropriate then. Lol. With a week or less to go though there are definitely better options OP.

TheProdigal · Post by **TheProdigal** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:10 pm

RZ5646 wrote:
theugg wrote:Why is everyone obsessed with cowgirl
It's nice for us guys because we get to lie back and not do all the work

Disagree. Nice view and all, but stressful as hell she's going to come down wrong.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:11 pm

cub1014 wrote:
theugg wrote:Tension are running high. . .
Maybe a sex related poll was actually appropriate then. Lol. With a week or less to go though there are definitely better options OP.

OP is a troll. He doesn't want to make good polls.

thatlawlkid · Post by **thatlawlkid** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:11 pm

^^this guy knows.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:11 pm

Post removed.

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:12 pm

If anything he's a clever troll. I'll give him that much.

ffamran · Post by **ffamran** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:13 pm

I LOVE THIS NEW POLL

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:15 pm

Post removed.

brief_little_candle · Post by **brief_little_candle** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:15 pm

appind wrote:
chicharon wrote:
brief_little_candle wrote:
appind wrote:
brief_little_candle wrote:After 2 months preparation, I took my first one in June and scored a mediocre 162.

My girlfriend, with no LSAT experience, did a diagnosis based on the June 2015. She made 15 mistakes in the game section and scored a 165 in timed condition.

She claimed she did not completely understand the RC nor the LRS. but still, she picked the answer confidently.

how could this be? does it mean she only had 2 misses in RC and LR combined for timed 165 without fully understanding these sections and no experience?
I know!!!!!!!

her only weakness is parallel reasoning, because she is not familiar with formal reasoning stuff. but she can do these conditional reasoning without diagramming and easily spotted the missiong conclusion and required assumption

also, english is not her first language
Is she good at math?
likely not as the op said she missed 15 in LG alone. but it's mind bogglin that she missed 2 total in RC and both LRs in timed test conditions when english is not even her first language.

op, first language?

she gave up the last two logic games. so you were right that she might not lose so many points in real test

yes, english is the first language for us.

Her explanation is the visual learner stuff. so anyone here can explain this kind of LSAT freak phenomenon? i really have no idea.

LurkSoHard · Post by **LurkSoHard** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:16 pm

Post removed...

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:16 pm

cub1014 wrote:If anything he's a clever troll. I'll give him that much.

Nope

chicharon · Post by **chicharon** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:16 pm

Post removed...

alpha kenny body · Post by **alpha kenny body** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:17 pm

performance art as posting