The Official December 2014 Study Group Forum

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:38 am

Shakawkaw wrote:
justabitunusual wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:I'd PW.

yeah, you should

eta: rigo will be on as soon as you pw anyway, plus we will validate
I'll PW when I can imbed images, promise. Or Colonel has permission to PW me in my stead.

i see you found your way out of your old location

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:39 am

Rhymes With Wolf wrote: Sorry for my prosopagnosia.

Um, had to google bc tipsy and bc illiterate...but thanks? I most resemble donna in attitude

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:40 am

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:
justabitunusual wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:I'd PW.

yeah, you should

eta: rigo will be on as soon as you pw anyway, plus we will validate
I'll PW when I can imbed images, promise. Or Colonel has permission to PW me in my stead.
i see you found your way out of your old location

pls send us shawshank's pw, she gave permission

eta: that was not code for sext incessantly while we all wait impatiently.

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:45 am

pwing other ppl is outside my ethical bounds

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:46 am

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:my ethical bounds

idk why but this sounds like an oxymoron

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:49 am

justabitunusual wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:my ethical bounds
idk why but this sounds like an oxymoron

i hope you drive in your inebriated state

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:54 am

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
justabitunusual wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:my ethical bounds
idk why but this sounds like an oxymoron
i hope you drive in your inebriated state

[youtube]fSY1wNK1kY8[/youtube]

eta: I wouldn't call it inebriated, just chill

schmelling · Post by **schmelling** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:02 am

Post removed.

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:12 am

And so you shall Schmell . . .

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:41 am

Post removed.

WorldsCollide · Post by **WorldsCollide** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:52 am

I can't even pretend I read through the posts.

Shakawkaw wrote:
WorldsCollide wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:
161 twins. High five!
SO MANY TWINS IN THIS THREAD TODAY! WUNDERBAR!
What's your game plan until game day? I feel like I'm stalling a lot. Need to get back on dat LSAT bull and ride it to victory.

One LG section a day, one to two PTs a week, drilling between 25-75 LR questions a day (supposed to be 25 but I'm behind so I need to catch up

) and I'm starting RC sections next week most likely.

Smallville · Post by **Smallville** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:03 am

theugg wrote:Everyone goes to bed so early 'round here.

need yer sleep otherwise your memory is affected and can mess with your studying... ask our resident brain person Peppermint

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:59 am

Dirigo wrote: I only post erection inducing pics ~~(tons of stubble with no smile) on grindr~~.

TCR.

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:02 am

Jgoods wrote:
theugg wrote:Everyone goes to bed so early 'round here.
need yer sleep otherwise your memory is affected and can mess with your studying... ask our resident brain person Peppermint

I need my 7 hours of sleep.

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:53 am

Was cleanin a house for $$$ and the dude had a penthouse and KY on his nightstand, that was funny. Married couple
, no recent babies, guess she likes to witness the faps.

This reminded me of the lsat.

See edit: forgot the faps

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:54 am

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:58 am

Dirigo wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Was cleanin a house for $$$ and the dude had a penthouse and KY on his nightstand, that was funny. Married couple
, no recent babies, guess she likes to witness the

This reminded me of the lsat.
R u drunk?

JUST TRYIN TO STAY ON-T

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:10 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Was cleanin a house for $$$ and the dude had a penthouse and KY on his nightstand, that was funny. Married couple
, no recent babies, guess she likes to witness the faps.

This reminded me of the lsat.

See edit: forgot the faps

Why do you automatically assume she likes to watch, as opposed to...I dunno, generally people use KY for segz.

Which they shouldn't. Because that stuff blows.

ETA: So, I'm an idiot and suck at reading comprehension. I thought you said the dude HAD a penthouse. As in, he lived in one. And you were reveling in his wealth. Maybe they like to read the articles, Colonel. Don't be judgey.

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:18 pm

For Nlee - (on topic):

Plan for today:

- Do set of LG.
- 50 Flaws.
- 50 Nec. Ass.
- 25 Conditional
- Maybe (maybe) finally do some RC.

peppermint · Post by **peppermint** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:24 pm

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:29 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:For Nlee - (on topic):

Plan for today:

- Do set of LG.
- 50 Flaws.
- 50 Nec. Ass.
- 25 Conditional
- Maybe (maybe) finally do some RC.

LOL. Thanks.

ETA: What's considered conditional drilling? Is that like diagrammable MBT's?

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:49 pm

nlee10 wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:For Nlee - (on topic):

Plan for today:

- Do set of LG.
- 50 Flaws.
- 50 Nec. Ass.
- 25 Conditional
- Maybe (maybe) finally do some RC.
LOL. Thanks.

ETA: What's considered conditional drilling? Is that like diagrammable MBT's?

Mint - I'm glad.

Nlee - I just bought the Cambridge Cond. Log. packet and am drilling through that. It's pretty much the same thing as the Suff. and Nec. ass packets - I just didn't have the foresight to realize that. It also includes parallel reasoning structures and questions for MSS and Justifications. I tend to freeze up sometimes when I see conditional logic, so sharpening dem skillz.

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:02 pm

Shakawkaw wrote: Nlee - I just bought the Cambridge Cond. Log. packet and am drilling through that. It's pretty much the same thing as the Suff. and Nec. ass packets - I just didn't have the foresight to realize that. It also includes parallel reasoning structures and questions for MSS and Justifications. I tend to freeze up sometimes when I see conditional logic, so sharpening dem skillz.

Maybe I should invest in this packet as well. I'm still a bit shaky on diagramming.

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:11 pm

nlee10 wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote: Nlee - I just bought the Cambridge Cond. Log. packet and am drilling through that. It's pretty much the same thing as the Suff. and Nec. ass packets - I just didn't have the foresight to realize that. It also includes parallel reasoning structures and questions for MSS and Justifications. I tend to freeze up sometimes when I see conditional logic, so sharpening dem skillz.
Maybe I should invest in this packet as well. I'm still a bit shaky on diagramming.

I would - with enough practice, I'm able to just juggle it all in my head instead of wasting time writing it down. Which packets do you have thus far? Or does BP give you guys their own stuff?

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:17 pm

Shakawkaw wrote: I would - with enough practice, I'm able to just juggle it all in my head instead of wasting time writing it down. Which packets do you have thus far? Or does BP give you guys their own stuff?

BP gives us extra practice sets, which are essentially equivalent to the Cambridge Packets based on Question Types. Except...those practice sets don't have ALL of the available questions from PT 1-38's unlike Cambridge.

We'll see though, aside from careless mistakes, I'm noticing that I don't really need to diagram anymore to get an adequate score on LR (which is 20+/25 for me).