Post removed. Forum

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:53 pm

Third time taker here, got my score about 45 minutes ago via e-mail, was not even expecting it, which was definitely a first.

Good luck to all those still waiting!

Cactus · Post by **Cactus** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:53 pm

walket wrote:
December 14th here, and kinda pissed I missed the -14 regularly scheduled administration. Here's to hoping February 2009 was -15...
Yeah that's no fun. Do you guys get a different curve?

I'm not sure how that works? If anyone knows I would much appreciate it.

I assume it's random... it's seem improbable that the December 2013, February 2009 (December 14th, 2013 postponed test) and February 2010 (December 21st, 2013 postponed test) would all have a -14 curve, but I could certainly be wrong.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:54 pm

Post removed.

muzzy · Post by **muzzy** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:54 pm

cm_burns · Post by **cm_burns** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:55 pm

First time taking it, 164.

-1 LR1
-5 LR2 (Disappointing)
-6 RC (A little low for me but not too bad)

-11 LG though. I think I may try the "do 3 perfectly and mostly guess the last one" method next time. I'm very disappointed, but if I take it again in Feb with that LG method I should get a 167/8, which I'd be ok with.

fnma2jd · Post by **fnma2jd** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:56 pm

Cactus wrote:
walket wrote:
December 14th here, and kinda pissed I missed the -14 regularly scheduled administration. Here's to hoping February 2009 was -15...
Yeah that's no fun. Do you guys get a different curve?
I'm not sure how that works? If anyone knows I would much appreciate it.

I assume it's random... it's seem improbable that the December 2013, February 2009 (December 14th, 2013 postponed test) and February 2010 (December 21st, 2013 postponed test) would all have a -14 curve, but I could certainly be wrong.

I took december 14th as well. We have whatever curve the actual test had. I'm guessing ours will be a smaller curve because it felt really easy.

BenjarvusGreenEllis · Post by **BenjarvusGreenEllis** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:56 pm

Blueprint LSAT ads on youtube. Not the time.

blackbirdfly · Post by **blackbirdfly** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:56 pm

cm_burns wrote:First time taking it, 164.

-1 LR1
-5 LR2 (Disappointing)
-6 RC (A little low for me but not too bad)

-11 LG though. I think I may try the "do 3 perfectly and mostly guess the last one" method next time. I'm very disappointed, but if I take it again in Feb with that LG method I should get a 167/8, which I'd be ok with.

No doubt you'll have a higher score in feb. Life gets so much easier once you master games.

chizzy · Post by **chizzy** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:57 pm

just stopped waiting on my scores, its 11:55 pm where i am now so im just going to bed before i go crazy.
goodluck to everyone!

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:57 pm

chizzy wrote:just stopped waiting on my scores, its 11:55 pm where i am now so im just going to bed before i go crazy.
goodluck to everyone!

but how

desichhori · Post by **desichhori** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:58 pm

JustHawkin wrote:160 in Oct...
169 in Dec!

One point off my mark but I am so excited for the progress I have made. TLS has, in the most literal sense, changed my life!

Goodluck to everyone still waiting!!

awesome!!!good luck!

wealtheow · Post by **wealtheow** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:58 pm

i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

Hitchensian · Post by **Hitchensian** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
chizzy wrote:just stopped waiting on my scores, its 11:55 pm where i am now so im just going to bed before i go crazy.
goodluck to everyone!
but how

This.

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

muzzy wrote:172.

Keep the good stuff coming, all.

Congrats!

Cactus · Post by **Cactus** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

fnma2jd wrote:
Cactus wrote:
walket wrote:
December 14th here, and kinda pissed I missed the -14 regularly scheduled administration. Here's to hoping February 2009 was -15...
Yeah that's no fun. Do you guys get a different curve?
I'm not sure how that works? If anyone knows I would much appreciate it.

I assume it's random... it's seem improbable that the December 2013, February 2009 (December 14th, 2013 postponed test) and February 2010 (December 21st, 2013 postponed test) would all have a -14 curve, but I could certainly be wrong.
I took december 14th as well. We have whatever curve the actual test had. I'm guessing ours will be a smaller curve because it felt really easy.

Yeah, rumors from February 2009 threads hint at a -10 curve but who knows.

CookieDough · Post by **CookieDough** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

AWESOME! So happy for you!!

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

CONGRATS WEALTHEOW!

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

CookieDough wrote:
wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO
AWESOME! So happy for you!!

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:59 pm

Post removed.

mellow · Post by **mellow** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:00 pm

wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

congrats!! that's an amazing jump

CookieDough · Post by **CookieDough** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:00 pm

muzzy wrote:172.

Keep the good stuff coming, all.

Congrats!!

cathicohen · Post by **cathicohen** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:01 pm

I assume it's random... it's seem improbable that the December 2013, February 2009 (December 14th, 2013 postponed test) and February 2010 (December 21st, 2013 postponed test) would all have a -14 curve, but I could certainly be wrong.[/quote]

I took december 14th as well. We have whatever curve the actual test had. I'm guessing ours will be a smaller curve because it felt really easy.[/quote]

Yeah, rumors from February 2009 threads hint at a -10 curve but who knows.[/quote]

if it's the same as the curve on the real test... here are all of the LSAT curves from every administration. http://www.cambridgelsat.com/resources/ ... on-charts/

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:01 pm

Nightrunner wrote:Where's ManoftheHour with his score update? I'm hungry.

vdh2102 · Post by **vdh2102** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:01 pm

wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

WOOHOO! Congratulations

!!!!!!! Go have a margarita!!!!

BLUERUFiO · Post by **BLUERUFiO** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:01 pm

wealtheow wrote:i am literally in tears. so happy. went from 164 in '11 to a 174!!! I CAN FINALLY SHRED MY MATERIALS WAHOOOOOO

WOO WOO! Congrats!!