Despite the fact the UNESCO was of different style than the usual, I also found it far easier to read (and quicker too!) than most RC passages. I had an experimental RC as well, and found the actual one to be easier. That being said, I'm not sure that I got the questions right per se.suspicious android wrote:UNESCO was fairly easy to read, passage B was especially straightforward, as you noted. However, I think two of the questions were really difficult. On RC the difficulty can lie in either the passage or the Q's. I don't know about prescriptivism/descriptivism, I feel like that one might vary a lot in difficulty depending on how familiar one is with that topic. Being a bit of a grammar/linguist nerd myself, I was really comfortable with all the points being made in the pasage.cmob wrote:UNESCO was weird because of the format, but it was almost easier because one of the passages was so succinct (trying not to disclose too much). This made it easier to find bad answers. I think you're talking about the prescriptive/descriptive language; that was a bitch because the perspectives were all jumbled together in the paragraphs. I think I had a few minutes at the end and legitimately could not figure out one of the questions because the passage was so confusing. Other two passages = easy.
I feel like at this point, I no longer have any idea whether I did well or not. I came out of the test thinking that things went well... But the longer time drags on, the lower I'm thinking that my score is.
