The December 2010 LG section made me want to... Forum

[akili]

The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.

Mulch is from June.

[The Truth]

say UHHHHHHH.....nah nah nah nahhhhh

[BlueDiamond]

The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.

Mulch is from June.

Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10

[akili]

The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.

Mulch is from June.

Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10

My bad, I thought when he said compensate he/she meant LSAC were compensating for October games being a joke (and mulch being one of them)

[BlueDiamond]

The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.

Mulch is from June.

Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10

My bad, I thought when he said compensate he/she meant LSAC were compensating for October games being a joke (and mulch being one of them)

I'm actually just more assuming he knows that than anything.. you could still be right haha

[Cmoss]

I had LR RC LR LR LG

Well, when I first finished it, I spent the first five minutes of the writing sample staring at my desk. I had rocked the other sections, and I was utterly confused as to how the LG was so shitty.

Then I thought of the different Dante-esque torments that await the LSAC employees in hell.

And then, I felt pretty good when I realized that everyone thought LG sucked.

But I learned that the LR that I had bombed thinking it was the experimental was real.

And that sucked.

+1

Please I hope the first LR is the experimental

It was the third section.

How do you figure

[biladtreasure2]

leave the one I'm with

start a new relationship wit' chuuu

This is what you do.

[KevinP]

Let me put it to you this way what the December LG section made me want to do. If LSAC was an annoying dog and I was a ninja cat:

--ImageRemoved--

[SchopenhauerFTW]

.

[vissidarte27]

Disclaimer: I didn't take December 2010. I'm taking the LSAT for the first time in February (and my GOD have these post-LSAT threads terrified me), but I feel like the following link is appropriate:

http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2 ... bably.html

For those who don't feel like clicking, a couple of pics:



The pain caused by LG was too serious for numbers?

[chopper]

It made me say "there's always the GMATs."

Side note, I dominated my first LG section, which I found out later was the one that is not scored.

[Anomaly]

yeayea we all "aced" our experimental right?

[chopper]

yeayea we all "aced" our experimental right?

Haha.

I'm serious though. I thought it was the real one since it was just as difficult as all the practices I've taken.

[Aro5389]

It made me say "there's always the GMATs."

Side note, I dominated my first LG section, which I found out later was the one that is not scored.

As did I, in which immediatly flipping to Section 4 after break I just merely looked at Game 1 and said FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.


Nonetheless, I completed it, got to stain glass windows, literally said "something is wrong here", flipped to the last game, did it in like 5 minutes, and then attempted Game 3 while trying to figure out damn stained glass windows.


Then I cried like OP during writing. I must say I found the writing section kind of funny despite sadness.

[paraclete11]

RC-LR-LG-LG-LR... Crushed the first set of logic games. Came back from the break to open section 4 to see more. Secton 4 I Completed two games accurately, the third game which was the stained glass game and the last which was an fairly easy sequencing game. Kind of uncertain about the first two games as I was in shock from having another section og LG . Considering what past test takers have indicated section3 is expiremental and that blows being that I completed all 4 games. Sucks to have one section screw you

[Sandro]

my LG score is going to come down to in large amount semi educated guesses on Stained Glass/Conferences. I feel i was able to fire off some decent guesses on 4 or so questions, using a combination of the rules/shying away from AC's that seemed not to be possible to be correct.

[ss12389]

Definitely cry during the writing sample. Definitely seriously consider med school.

[Cmoss]

+1

Please I hope the first LR is the experimental

It was the third section.

How do you figure

Unless the number of questions for each section were different. If the second LR (3rd section) had 25 questions, then it was experimental.

now i want to cry

[Tullstone]

The kid was 10 for me, too.

I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.

a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.

ahahahh!!!! YESSS!!!

[Benjamin J]

The kid was 10 for me, too.

I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.

a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.

ahahahh!!!! YESSS!!!

I didn't manage anything quite like that as a response, but since they didn't specify if the kid was a boy or girl, instead of referring to the child as Mr./Mrs. Wang's son or daughter, I just referred to it as "the little Wang." Must've written "because this would be most beneficial for the little Wang" half a dozen times.

I really needed something to smile about after getting blindsided by a second, and rather painful section of logic games after the break.

[FakeBlood]

break stained glass windows!

AMEN. +111111111111

made me flip through an MCAT. for reals.

i hear that. the mcat was way easier than the LSAT has been..

A part of my soul is still dying inside.

+1

[bartleby]

I was so bummed after LG, I got tripped up in the writing sample on when to use Wangs' and when to use Wangs. I hope law schools don't check it for grammar.

[SchopenhauerFTW]

.

[Sandro]

I did much better on the LSAT than I did the GRE...

[jerrymander]

I didn't manage anything quite like that as a response, but since they didn't specify if the kid was a boy or girl, instead of referring to the child as Mr./Mrs. Wang's son or daughter, I just referred to it as "the little Wang." Must've written "because this would be most beneficial for the little Wang" half a dozen times.

I really needed something to smile about after getting blindsided by a second, and rather painful section of logic games after the break.

+1 epic

Auto-admit Yale for creativity and humor....it takes big balls to write about a little Wang on the LSAT...