December 2010 Initial Reactions Forum

[LawPlz]

I had

LR RC LR LR LG


I know the first LR must have been the experimental unless the test was out of 102 (which is highly unlikely)

I had the same sequence of section and yes the first section was experimental. I could tell when I was taking it that it was because the questions were very awkward.

I agree. I could also instantly tell it was the experimental because there were like 10 assumption questions lol (exaggeration, but you get the point)

[LSATclincher]

Someone in my section did mention it was 102 questions. Did they purposely expect to omit a question?

[jd20132013]

I had

LR RC LR LR LG


I know the first LR must have been the experimental unless the test was out of 102 (which is highly unlikely)

I had the same sequence of section and yes the first section was experimental. I could tell when I was taking it that it was because the questions were very awkward.

I agree. I could also instantly tell it was the experimental because there were like 10 assumption questions lol (exaggeration, but you get the point)

O_o

I noticed a lot of Principle questions in that first one.

But glad to hear it was the experimental. I'm cautiously predicting no worse than a -2 or 3 total on LR for me in that case, although I did pretty well on that LR anyway

[Rikkugrrl]

I know what you're talking about, and no it was real. I didn't have an experimental LR and I remember thinking "the hell is this???"

Was the LR with all the questions of one particular type the experimental(unsure if I can say which type it was, but one LR had a LOT of "X" type questions"

Also the LG was killer. Thank GOD I skipped ahead to the last game when the stained glass fucked me over.

[URMdan]

I had

LR RC LR LR LG


I know the first LR must have been the experimental unless the test was out of 102 (which is highly unlikely)

All 3 LR sections I had consisted of 26 questions

[asdfqwer1234]

My exp LR had 25 Q's

I had

LR RC LR LR LG


I know the first LR must have been the experimental unless the test was out of 102 (which is highly unlikely)

All 3 LR sections I had consisted of 26 questions

[phannahan44]

Anyone else with 2 LG sections notice how the experimental section was wayyy easier!? It was a joke. I had that section 3rd and then flipped the page after the break to see another LG and I thought shit!

The real LG section was impossible. I was just guessing. The windows game, and conferences game, killed me.

Here's to guessing well?!?

[beidoun]

Was it 102? If so I was wrong about what I thought was the experimental LR.


I had 26 26 25 for my 3 LR sections.

I thought my 1st section for 26 was wrong solely becuase I have never seen a 102 question exam.

27 and 23 for RC and LG respectively.

[veragood]

My test was out of 102, as well.

I'm so pissed that the real LG was the stained glass. Are we 100% on that shit? Fucck, I thought that it for sure was the EXP since it barely gave you any room in the first section and then the 3rd puzzle was so hard.


I'm not even sure if I've seen a 102 question practice test before?

I'm thinking I...

aced the RC, 1-2 off on the LR, 4(?) wrong on the LG.

wonder where that puts me. 96-97/102 = ...? 176-177?


not to brag, but if i hurt that bad on that LG, a lotttt of other people are going to hurt worse.

[LawPlz]

Are you guys sure? First time for a 102 test?

[LSATclincher]

I had

LR
RC
RC (exp)
LR
LG

I thought LG was very challenging, but the ease of game 1 helped in terms of time. I think I finished game 1 in 4mins.

[jd20132013]

Extremely Hard LG=Good curve?

:/

[Sandro]

WOW. This test was definitely harder than October. LG (Windows/Conferences) made October look like a CAKE WALK! I was lost on both games and my score will come down to straight guessing. LR was the same I think and RC was a little harder.... -12 at the absolute min, -13 or -14 for sure. LG is going to kill everyone.

[veragood]

100% sure the test was out of 102

[Rikkugrrl]

My test was out of 102, as well.

I'm so pissed that the real LG was the stained glass. Are we 100% on that shit? Fucck, I thought that it for sure was the EXP since it barely gave you any room in the first section and then the 3rd puzzle was so hard.


I'm not even sure if I've seen a 102 question practice test before?

I'm thinking I...

aced the RC, 1-2 off on the LR, 4(?) wrong on the LG.

wonder where that puts me. 96-97/102 = ...? 176-177?


not to brag, but if i hurt that bad on that LG, a lotttt of other people are going to hurt worse.

I'm positive, my friend had LR as experimental and he clearly remembered a game with stained glass windows.

[hokie]

100% sure the test was out of 102

ditto

[Moral_Midgetry]

Anyone else with 2 LG sections notice how the experimental section was wayyy easier!? It was a joke. I had that section 3rd and then flipped the page after the break to see another LG and I thought shit!

The real LG section was impossible. I was just guessing. The windows game, and conferences game, killed me.

Here's to guessing well?!?

Seriously. I wanted to cry ten minutes into the real LG. I had time on the first one to go back and check my answers and everything. I was praying that was the scored section because it was no doubt -0. The real one for me is probably -4 or more which is way more than I average (1 or 2 MAX, usually -0).

[veragood]

I'm thinking (read: hoping) that, if the stained glass is actually the real LG (anyone with only *one* LG can confirm?), they'll drop one or two of the most missed questions to bring it down from 102.

[Moral_Midgetry]

100% sure the test was out of 102

ditto

RC: 27
LR: 26
LR: 26
Both LG: 23

= 102

[jd20132013]

Well, everyone's reactions to the LGs is at least making me feel better. In Oct everyone was declaring them to be easy.

So maybe I did get better, LSAC just fucked us over lmao...

Glad I got LG last. Although I wanted it first going in, a LG that hard might have thrown me the rest of the way

[phannahan44]

WOW. This test was definitely harder than October. LG (Windows/Conferences) made October look like a CAKE WALK! I was lost on both games and my score will come down to straight guessing. LR was the same I think and RC was a little harder.... -12 at the absolute min, -13 or -14 for sure. LG is going to kill everyone.

+1. I was COMPLETELY guessing.

[LSATclincher]

Anyone else with 2 LG sections notice how the experimental section was wayyy easier!? It was a joke. I had that section 3rd and then flipped the page after the break to see another LG and I thought shit!

The real LG section was impossible. I was just guessing. The windows game, and conferences game, killed me.

Here's to guessing well?!?

Seriously. I wanted to cry ten minutes into the real LG. I had time on the first one to go back and check my answers and everything. I was praying that was the scored section because it was no doubt -0. The real one for me is probably -4 or more which is way more than I average (1 or 2 MAX, usually -0).

I almost collapsed mid-way through LG (usually I'm -3 tops on the section). I had to mentally re-group to finish with on a solid note. I'm guessing I'm -5 tops. One of the most challenging mental feats of my life, for sure.

[2014]

Didn't even realize it was 102, hopefully that boosts the "curve" more.

I think I went:
-4 RC
-0 LG
-1 LR1
-2 LR2

Hopefully a -7 is a 176 or even 177, I would be stoked.
I feel so much better after this one than October.

[ali15]

I ad 2 RCs can anyone verify that the one about Parliment and lending money was expiremental?

[lilliea]

I'm thinking (read: hoping) that, if the stained glass is actually the real LG (anyone with only *one* LG can confirm?), they'll drop one or two of the most missed questions to bring it down from 102.

I had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG. Stained glass is completely legitimate.