What score do you consider disappointing? Forum

[Ragged]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

It is OK comrade, only capitalists are satisfied with anything below a 175.

--ImageRemoved--

[Hedwig]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

It is OK comrade, only capitalists are satisfied with anything below a 175.

--ImageRemoved--

I like my 174. I am a capitalist at heart. COINCIDENCE I THINK NOT.

[MysticalWheel]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

With that score, you have a shot at H or S if your GPA is 3.5+.

MW

[MysticalWheel]

Anything under 174, my actual score, would have spelled disappointment for me. It's still not really an impressive score, which would be 177+. I am upset at myself for not bubbling in 2 answers, 1 of which was the credited response. No offense to anyone with 175, but I think I would be losing my mind over the fact that one more question correct would have resulted in a 177.

MW

Tell me about it. I got a 175 and I left a question blank on accident. How do you think that makes me feel?

Statistically speaking, there is little difference between 175 and 177, and I would think that this will especially hold true for the Oct. '10 LSAT. So it's really not that bad at all. Bragging rights, however, do not follow cold statistics.

MW

[Ragged]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

With that score, you have a shot at H or S if your GPA is 3.5+.

MW

I'm a retaker. My average is now only 171 as opposed to 172 or even 173 if I did better. And the fact is that I should have done atleat 3 points better but missed some easy problems, which still stings. But I'm coping.

[Total Litigator]

This poll would be much better if every thing was <1XX, instead of simply XX

[MysticalWheel]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

With that score, you have a shot at H or S if your GPA is 3.5+.

MW

I'm a retaker. My average is now only 171 as opposed to 172 or even 173 if I did better. And the fact is that I should have done atleat 3 points better but missed some easy problems, which still stings. But I'm coping.

I'd apply to at least Stanford. But retake or not, it's a great score that opens the door to great schools, even if your GPA is not stellar.

MW

[Blumpbeef]

The 169 I got was pretty disappointing, although I wouldn't have been happy with anything less than a 173. Basically, from 172-168 is like LSAT purgatory.

[motiontodismiss]

Anything with a 6 in the tens place. I'll be happy with anything in a 7 in the tens place and totally shocked with anything that rounds to a 180.

Given my horrendous GPA and unremarkable work experience I won't get into any school whose 75% is greater than 175.

[sophia.olive]

Anything under 174, my actual score, would have spelled disappointment for me. It's still not really an impressive score, which would be 177+. I am upset at myself for not bubbling in 2 answers, 1 of which was the credited response. No offense to anyone with 175, but I think I would be losing my mind over the fact that one more question correct would have resulted in a 177.

MW

Tell me about it. I got a 175 and I left a question blank on accident. How do you think that makes me feel?

Statistically speaking, there is little difference between 175 and 177, and I would think that this will especially hold true for the Oct. '10 LSAT. So it's really not that bad at all. Bragging rights, however, do not follow cold statistics.


MW

177 is above every schools 75% and a 175 is not.

[Ragged]

Anything under 174, my actual score, would have spelled disappointment for me. It's still not really an impressive score, which would be 177+. I am upset at myself for not bubbling in 2 answers, 1 of which was the credited response. No offense to anyone with 175, but I think I would be losing my mind over the fact that one more question correct would have resulted in a 177.

MW

Tell me about it. I got a 175 and I left a question blank on accident. How do you think that makes me feel?

Statistically speaking, there is little difference between 175 and 177, and I would think that this will especially hold true for the Oct. '10 LSAT. So it's really not that bad at all. Bragging rights, however, do not follow cold statistics.


MW

177 is above every schools 75% and a 175 is not.

I got the impression that schools don't really care that much about 25th - 75th because their median is what effects their rank. Not sure though.

[cowgirl_bebop]

I was shooting for no less than a 170, so 169 or below would be disappointing. I got a 167. Guess how long I cried

[kiniru]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

With that score, you have a shot at H or S if your GPA is 3.5+.

MW

Thats not what it seems like based on what people say... H has some seriously high floors! Unless you go there for UG
IDK I was holding out for H too until I got my 174. Now its more like CCN. Eh I like NYC

[minnbills]

For me, any score near the low end of my PT range is disappointing.

But yeah TLS is ridiculous.

I was complaining about my 162 on OCT. to my aunt (who is a lawyer, and a heavy hitter in a major corporation, not to brag but it adds to the effect) and she told me to stop being such a jerk...

EDIT: for clarification, my score was quite disappointing.

[Patriot1208]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

With that score, you have a shot at H or S if your GPA is 3.5+.

MW

Thats not what it seems like based on what people say... H has some seriously high floors! Unless you go there for UG
IDK I was holding out for H too until I got my 174. Now its more like CCN. Eh I like NYC

That is completely false. At least, not anywhere near a decent chance. Look at LSN. Everyone with those numbers got rejected from H and S.

[James Bond]

I know people will hate me for this, but I was dissapointed as hell with a 174. That basically ruined my chances at HYS. Sorry.

It is OK comrade, only capitalists are satisfied with anything below a 175.

...how does that even come close to making sense?