UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol Forum
- applepiecrust

- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
- Ragged

- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Wow and I thought mine was bad.
I wish they had a statistic for the people who studied really hard for the LSAT, instead of bunching everyone together. They could have a scantron question to the likes of "How many hours a week would you say oyu spent studying for the LSAT?"
I wish they had a statistic for the people who studied really hard for the LSAT, instead of bunching everyone together. They could have a scantron question to the likes of "How many hours a week would you say oyu spent studying for the LSAT?"
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Would be interesting to intersect the study-time statistics with the score distributions.
People who got 177+ with less than 3 hours a week, or people under 150 with over 35 hours a week
People who got 177+ with less than 3 hours a week, or people under 150 with over 35 hours a week
- beachbum

- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
FWIW, my undergrad has a mean LSAT of 153. I just got back from a law school fair being held in the student center in which roughly 80 schools were represented. The only T20 in attendance was WUSTL (who had to make all of a 10 minute drive to show up). The overwhelming majority of booths belonged to TTTs. I'm ready to graduate.
-
waketiger

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:27 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
12 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
10 - 85- 89
10 - 80- 84
8 - 75- 79
8 - 70- 74
6 - 65- 69
7 - 60- 64
6 - 55- 59
3 - 50- 54
4 - 45- 49
4 - 40- 44
2 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
2 - 0- 19
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
12 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
10 - 85- 89
10 - 80- 84
8 - 75- 79
8 - 70- 74
6 - 65- 69
7 - 60- 64
6 - 55- 59
3 - 50- 54
4 - 45- 49
4 - 40- 44
2 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
2 - 0- 19
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
- AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
A 3.5 isn't much inflation with those LSATSapplepiecrust wrote:95 & up 21
90- 94 15
85- 89 11
80- 84 10
75- 79 7
70- 74 7
65- 69 4
60- 64 5
55- 59 4
50- 54 3
45- 49 3
40- 44 3
35- 39 2
30- 34 2
25- 29 1
20- 24 1
0- 19 2
My school's distribution. I'm glad I go to a school with smarter people, I guess?
The average law school applicant's GPA from my school is 3.5. Heavy grade inflation, much?
-
mtrl

- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:13 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
You also at McGill?ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
- lennonist

- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
My school's LSAT stats:
18 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
9 - 85- 89
8 - 80- 84
6 - 75- 79
7 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
4 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
3 - 45- 49
3 - 40- 44
3 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
6 - 0- 19
mean is a 159
18 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
9 - 85- 89
8 - 80- 84
6 - 75- 79
7 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
4 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
3 - 45- 49
3 - 40- 44
3 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
6 - 0- 19
mean is a 159
- jwaters

- Posts: 224
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:02 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
waketiger wrote:
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
Only those who signed up for CAS in the last three years.
- Patriot1208

- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
No, it's in your ASR.
- beachbum

- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
It's from the academic summary report. It'll show up when your transcript is processed.Patriot1208 wrote:Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?
- Patriot1208

- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Edit: answered above.incompetentia wrote:No, it's in your ASR.
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
54% of my school is 80%+, mean 160
Damn overachievers...
Damn overachievers...
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Roughly:achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
40% 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
HYP and similar UGs have ~165 medians (92nd percentile).incompetentia wrote:That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =2&t=74320
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11465
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I believe Harvard is 166, Princeton is 164 & Northwestern is at 162.
- longdaysjourney

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:47 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
At first I went to a huge state school that is ranked very low, I then transferred to a private liberal arts school that is ranked very high. When comparing the spreads from those two separate schools I was shocked to find that the low ranked state school had a more impressive spread of scorers. I went into debt for nothing.... 
- NCtoDC

- Posts: 542
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Mine is almost as bad. In the 0-19 column mine is 35.JurisDoctorate wrote:Unfortunately, I win. My 0-19 number has a 4 in the tens column
-
two_wheels_good

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:53 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I don't have yours beat, but mine was surprising:
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
95 & up 2
90- 94 3
85- 89 4
80- 84 3
75- 79 4
70- 74 5
65- 69 4
60- 64 6
55- 59 5
50- 54 4
45- 49 5
40- 44 6
35- 39 5
30- 34 5
25- 29 7
20- 24 7
0- 19 24
Mean: 149
I certainly don't see myself as 170 material, but 149 seems attainable even after a three day bender. What the hell?
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
95 & up 2
90- 94 3
85- 89 4
80- 84 3
75- 79 4
70- 74 5
65- 69 4
60- 64 6
55- 59 5
50- 54 4
45- 49 5
40- 44 6
35- 39 5
30- 34 5
25- 29 7
20- 24 7
0- 19 24
Mean: 149
I certainly don't see myself as 170 material, but 149 seems attainable even after a three day bender. What the hell?
-
ajmanyjah

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I would tend to think my school has more UG to law school applicants though, because of tuition rates and language within the provinceapplepiecrust wrote:UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
- s0ph1e2007

- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
yupim_blue wrote:Roughly:achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
40%+ 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+
-
ajmanyjah

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Yea...well I graduated a few years agomtrl wrote:You also at McGill?ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
also saw a 3.35 average GPA---and most of those kids were probably Arts faculty kids...pretty sad---though I assume the 2.7 Philosophy average GPA might have brought it down
- omninode

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
My school:
1 - 95 & up
3 - 90- 94
4 - 85- 89
5 - 80- 84
4 - 75- 79
3 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
5 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
7 - 45- 49
7 - 40- 44
5 - 35- 39
7 - 30- 34
6 - 25- 29
9 - 20- 24
22 - 0- 19
Mean of 148. Not good, but better than I expected considering the number of mouth-breathers I heard at the October test saying they felt "safe" because they got low 150s on the June test. I felt like I was the only person there expecting a 165+. Have fun at Cooley, boys.
1 - 95 & up
3 - 90- 94
4 - 85- 89
5 - 80- 84
4 - 75- 79
3 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
5 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
7 - 45- 49
7 - 40- 44
5 - 35- 39
7 - 30- 34
6 - 25- 29
9 - 20- 24
22 - 0- 19
Mean of 148. Not good, but better than I expected considering the number of mouth-breathers I heard at the October test saying they felt "safe" because they got low 150s on the June test. I felt like I was the only person there expecting a 165+. Have fun at Cooley, boys.