Compiled Hardest LR Questions Forum

[b4uu4b]

No, there was a very obvious paradox.

Nope. In as general terms as possible, the question asked to explain the paradox between experiencing fewer bee stings while observing fewer bees flying around.

You misread the stimulus. Fewer bees around, but MORE bee stings.

+1.

[dabomb75]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

yea, I think I got it as well, but only because it was the only by eliminating the rest of the answers and thinking "well I guess this is the only possible one it could be"

[DearCan]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

This was actually pretty easy. There was a trick in it though, but the answer was very obvious once you got the distinctions between networks vs. broadcasts.

[alphagamma]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

That one was easy, I thought. It was an "all of the following can be inferred EXCEPT" question, right?

[sidhesadie]

No, there was a very obvious paradox.

Nope. In as general terms as possible, the question asked to explain the paradox between experiencing fewer bee stings while observing fewer bees flying around.

You misread the stimulus. Fewer bees around, but MORE bee stings.

+1.

+1 more.

[jr1886]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

I thought Network v. Broadcast was easy. If you can tell me what you pick, that would jolt my memory. But i think i got it right

[Attorney]

I didn't misread it, you misread my analogy.

The bee stings were the crimes. They declined.
There were fewer bees around because they were being placed in a jar by their human overlords.

[DearCan]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

I thought Network v. Broadcast was easy. If you can tell me what you pick, that would jolt my memory. But i think i got it right

There was only one choice that was the complete opposite of what the stimulus said.

[DearCan]

I didn't misread it, you misread my analogy.

The bee stings were the crimes. They declined.
There were fewer bees around because they were being placed in a holding jar!

That's terrible logic.

[overunderachiever]

I didn't misread it, you misread my analogy.

The bee stings were the crimes. They declined.
There were fewer bees around because they were being placed in a jar by their human overlords.

lol!

[incompetentia]

Ten bucks that in 24 hours this thread is as long as Waiting thread.

[kkklick]

Anyone else have trouble with networks vs. Broadcast? I think I got it but it was pretty weak.

I thought Network v. Broadcast was easy. If you can tell me what you pick, that would jolt my memory. But i think i got it right

There was only one choice that was the complete opposite of what the stimulus said.

Yea, I remember seeing one choice that was obviously right.

[kkklick]

Ten bucks that in 24 hours this thread is as long as Waiting thread.

+1

[kwais]

are we serious about Shakespeare here? there were dozens of more complex questions than that one (or I fell into a trap)

[Attorney]

That's terrible logic.

Either "logic" or "terrible" doesn't mean what you think it means.

[sidhesadie]

I don't even remember a network/broadcast question.

I'm beginning to wonder if I even took this test!!!!!

[DearCan]

That's terrible logic.

Either "logic" or "terrible" doesn't mean what you think it means.

If you say so. Regardless, there was an obvious paradox in the stimulus, and an obvious right AC. Give LSAC a little more credit.

[alphagamma]

Ten bucks that in 24 hours this thread is locked.

Fixed.

[jr1886]

Why no one thought the highway speed limit was hard?
It slows me down considerably. I think it was a Strengthen Principle question

[Attorney]

That's terrible logic.

If you say so. Regardless, there was an obvious paradox in the stimulus, and an obvious right AC. Give LSAC a little more credit.

I've yet to see you respond to the logic in a coherent way. Evidently you think it is not obvious that fewer bees in the fields might commit fewer bee stings.

As for giving LSAC credit, they do drop questions because they mis-write questions, and I won't be surprised if they drop this one... but who knows, maybe they'll keep it. I'd guess that people with logic/economic/engineering/CS backgrounds hated this question, and liberal arts majors were possibly more likely to think it made perfect sense.

[DearCan]

I've yet to see you respond to the logic in a coherent way. Evidently you think it is not obvious that fewer bees in the fields might commit fewer bee stings.

As for giving LSAC credit, they do drop questions because they mis-write questions, and I won't be surprised if they drop this one... but who knows, maybe they'll keep it. I'd guess that people with logic/economic/engineering/CS backgrounds hated this question, and liberal arts majors were possibly more likely to think it made perfect sense.

Well your first analogy was fewer bee stings, fewer bees. My only point was that the analogy for that question is more bee stings, fewer bees. Granted it's a reverse analogy so that it makes sense in the context of the question.

[alphagamma]

Why no one thought the highway speed limit was hard?
It slows me down considerably. I think it was a Strengthen Principle question

I vaguely remember that question. Unfortunately, it has blurred together in my head with the bajillion other LR questions about speed limits.

[Attorney]

I've yet to see you respond to the logic in a coherent way. Evidently you think it is not obvious that fewer bees in the fields might commit fewer bee stings.

As for giving LSAC credit, they do drop questions because they mis-write questions, and I won't be surprised if they drop this one... but who knows, maybe they'll keep it. I'd guess that people with logic/economic/engineering/CS backgrounds hated this question, and liberal arts majors were possibly more likely to think it made perfect sense.

Well your first analogy was fewer bee stings, fewer bees. My only point was that the analogy for that question is more bee stings, fewer bees. Granted it's a reverse analogy so that it makes sense in the context of the question.

So the number of bee stings committed did not decline? I'm 100% sure that the bee sting rate declined, not increased.

[DearCan]

Why no one thought the highway speed limit was hard?
It slows me down considerably. I think it was a Strengthen Principle question

I vaguely remember that question. Unfortunately, it has blurred together in my head with the bajillion other LR questions about speed limits.

I thought it was difficult, and I won't know if I got it right or wrong until the test is disclosed.

[YCrevolution]

..