What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers) Forum
- FutureApplicant
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
- mottainai
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 12:17 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I seriously doubt that LSAC would adjust the curves for test takers outside of North America, considering how many native speakers do take the test. At my test center in Tokyo, most of the test takers seemed to be native speakers. It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage. Otherwise, if I were a taking the exam, I would flock outside the US to take advantage of this system.FutureApplicant wrote:What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
I could be wrong though.
- SentinelsOfEvil
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:24 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I have to agree, it would be too impractical to adjust on the basis of native speaking abilitymottainai wrote:I seriously doubt that LSAC would adjust the curves for test takers outside of North America, considering how many native speakers do take the test. At my test center in Tokyo, most of the test takers seemed to be native speakers. It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage. Otherwise, if I were a taking the exam, I would flock outside the US to take advantage of this system.FutureApplicant wrote:What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
I could be wrong though.
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Just curious - did anyone have a non-floodplains test??
+1mottainai wrote: It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage.
- neptunestar
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FutureApplicant
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Agreed.neptunestar wrote:Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol
There was a kid at my test center--native Chinese speaker and college English major--who was taking for his second time. The first time he'd gotten a 160. He wanted a 165 so that he could go to a "top 30" law school. I was impressed.
It was also funny to hear so many people fretting about RC, when it seems like for many native speakers the dragon in the closet is always LG.
- PLATONiC
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I find it hard to believe that this test will actually end up with a generous curve.
Although the RC passage was difficult, I don't think that it was that much more difficult than the usual RC. But if LSAC decides to offer a -14 curve, I'm sure that I'd end up with a 170s score.

Although the RC passage was difficult, I don't think that it was that much more difficult than the usual RC. But if LSAC decides to offer a -14 curve, I'm sure that I'd end up with a 170s score.



-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:32 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Nothing is hard to believe. Everything is possible.PLATONiC wrote:I find it hard to believe that this test will actually end up with a generous curve.
Although the RC passage was difficult, I don't think that it was that much more difficult than the usual RC. But if LSAC decides to offer a -14 curve, I'm sure that I'd end up with a 170s score.![]()
![]()
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I knowyurishima wrote:These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.

However, there is also a significant lack of neurotic obsession in this thread. I feel like this contributes to time feeling even slower.
Last night I had a nightmare that I misbubbled a whole section. I woke up at 1am and couldn't sleep again until 5... and then had to wake up at 6:30 to go to work

- PLATONiC
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I'd be neurotically obsessed if I didn't screw up that logic games section, because that means that I would have a chance at getting a really high score. I've pretty much given up on this possibility.
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
True, non-native speakers may sometimes be at a disadvantage, but in many cases, knowing multiple languages could mean one can handle different languages with (almost) equal ease. I say this as a non-native speaker who had reverse scores on the SAT at least: much higher writing and verbal scores (99 percentile) than math(94 percentile).FutureApplicant wrote:Agreed.neptunestar wrote:Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol
There was a kid at my test center--native Chinese speaker and college English major--who was taking for his second time. The first time he'd gotten a 160. He wanted a 165 so that he could go to a "top 30" law school. I was impressed.
It was also funny to hear so many people fretting about RC, when it seems like for many native speakers the dragon in the closet is always LG.
- neptunestar
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Does anyone have numbers on how many people take the LSAT in Asia every year and what % of that is the total number of LSAT takers worldwide or even compared to the US?
Random question but just curious....
Random question but just curious....
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I'm neurotically obsessed because I really really think now that I've misbubbled.PLATONiC wrote:I'd be neurotically obsessed if I didn't screw up that logic games section, because that means that I would have a chance at getting a really high score. I've pretty much given up on this possibility.





- hemm
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:56 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
- FutureApplicant
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Haha, I've been having the same feelings. Did I screw up the bubbling? Did I misread this question? Did I miss something on that question? Did I zone out for a few questions without really realizing it?hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
Hopefully we're all just panicking needlessly. Hopefully.
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Well, we still have a couple of days left to cancel..........................hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
Looks like I won't be able to sleep tonight either

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I had the exact same feeling. I almost canceled on the spot, then debated canceling for several days after the test. I was convinced I had gotten something in the range of 163-165 (after a PT average of 170), but decided to let it ride on the off-chance that I did better than expected (and wouldn't have to retake). My actual score: 170.hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
As far as the curve... it'll probably be more generous than you think. If I recall from the June 7 LSAT thread, just about everyone was predicting a curve around -10. Some of the crazier among us seemed to think it would be -11. The actual curve: -12. And it was only out of 99 questions (one was removed). (For what it's worth, I had a different screen name then, but decided to change it to better protect my identity).
And if you go back to the December 09 test thread, the curve predictions were about the same... until they got hit with that -14. Just sayin. It seems that a lot of us jump to negative conclusions about our test experience, but I wouldn't worry too much until you have your score in hand.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
.
Last edited by pjuls123 on Fri May 18, 2012 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PLATONiC
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
-14 Curve = 170+
- SentinelsOfEvil
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:24 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
I'd love to know that too... The only info I can give you is that around 20 ppl took it in Singaporeneptunestar wrote:Does anyone have numbers on how many people take the LSAT in Asia every year and what % of that is the total number of LSAT takers worldwide or even compared to the US?
Random question but just curious....
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hemm
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:56 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Yeah I hope we're all freaking out for no reason. I felt good after the test, but now I'm remembering how little diagramming I did in the LR sections and how I changed a few answers before time ran out and thinking I could've made some big mistakes.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:17 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
There were 8 people taking it in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.SentinelsOfEvil wrote:The only info I can give you is that around 20 ppl took it in Singapore
- PLATONiC
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
There were nearly 200 people at my test center in Seoul, Korea.
- FutureApplicant
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)
Last night I had a nightmare about the LSAT as well, specifically the LG section. After that I had a dream about an ex-girlfriend. On balance, right now I'd rather be thinking about the ex-girlfriend.kazu wrote:I knowyurishima wrote:These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.![]()
However, there is also a significant lack of neurotic obsession in this thread. I feel like this contributes to time feeling even slower.
Last night I had a nightmare that I misbubbled a whole section. I woke up at 1am and couldn't sleep again until 5... and then had to wake up at 6:30 to go to work
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login