Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers) Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
FutureApplicant

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by FutureApplicant » Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:13 am

PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.

User avatar
mottainai

Bronze
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 12:17 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by mottainai » Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:26 am

FutureApplicant wrote:
PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.
I seriously doubt that LSAC would adjust the curves for test takers outside of North America, considering how many native speakers do take the test. At my test center in Tokyo, most of the test takers seemed to be native speakers. It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage. Otherwise, if I were a taking the exam, I would flock outside the US to take advantage of this system.

I could be wrong though.

User avatar
SentinelsOfEvil

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:24 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by SentinelsOfEvil » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:21 am

mottainai wrote:
FutureApplicant wrote:
PLATONiC wrote: Also, I'm very suspicious of LSAC being less lenient with their curves when it comes to undisclosed tests. They could easily get away with it. But this is just an irrational suspicion:D
What I'm curious about is how LSAC takes into account the large portion of non-native speakers on overseas tests. At least at my test center, well over 90% of the test takers were not native English speakers. While I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone with the guts to tackle the LSAT in a second language (I can't imagine attempting a graduate-level exam in Mandarin) one would nevertheless have to assume that the LSAT would be harder for non-native speakers. Therefore, it seems likely the average score would tend to be lower on a test given in China/Korea/Japan than one given in the US.
I seriously doubt that LSAC would adjust the curves for test takers outside of North America, considering how many native speakers do take the test. At my test center in Tokyo, most of the test takers seemed to be native speakers. It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage. Otherwise, if I were a taking the exam, I would flock outside the US to take advantage of this system.

I could be wrong though.
I have to agree, it would be too impractical to adjust on the basis of native speaking ability

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by kazu » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:40 am

Just curious - did anyone have a non-floodplains test??
mottainai wrote: It would be difficult to create a curve that would simultaneously adjust to non-native speakers and yet be tough enough for native speakers not to take advantage.
+1

User avatar
neptunestar

New
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by neptunestar » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:43 am

Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
FutureApplicant

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by FutureApplicant » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:05 pm

neptunestar wrote:Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol
Agreed.

There was a kid at my test center--native Chinese speaker and college English major--who was taking for his second time. The first time he'd gotten a 160. He wanted a 165 so that he could go to a "top 30" law school. I was impressed.

It was also funny to hear so many people fretting about RC, when it seems like for many native speakers the dragon in the closet is always LG.

User avatar
PLATONiC

Bronze
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by PLATONiC » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:06 am

I find it hard to believe that this test will actually end up with a generous curve.

Although the RC passage was difficult, I don't think that it was that much more difficult than the usual RC. But if LSAC decides to offer a -14 curve, I'm sure that I'd end up with a 170s score. :( :( :(

yurishima

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:32 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by yurishima » Thu Jul 01, 2010 3:38 am

These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.

Justiceinbrothel

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:24 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by Justiceinbrothel » Thu Jul 01, 2010 3:42 am

PLATONiC wrote:I find it hard to believe that this test will actually end up with a generous curve.

Although the RC passage was difficult, I don't think that it was that much more difficult than the usual RC. But if LSAC decides to offer a -14 curve, I'm sure that I'd end up with a 170s score. :( :( :(
Nothing is hard to believe. Everything is possible.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by kazu » Thu Jul 01, 2010 3:59 am

yurishima wrote:These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.
I know :cry:

However, there is also a significant lack of neurotic obsession in this thread. I feel like this contributes to time feeling even slower.


Last night I had a nightmare that I misbubbled a whole section. I woke up at 1am and couldn't sleep again until 5... and then had to wake up at 6:30 to go to work :(

User avatar
PLATONiC

Bronze
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by PLATONiC » Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:37 am

I'd be neurotically obsessed if I didn't screw up that logic games section, because that means that I would have a chance at getting a really high score. I've pretty much given up on this possibility.

User avatar
applepiecrust

Bronze
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by applepiecrust » Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:50 am

FutureApplicant wrote:
neptunestar wrote:Those RC passages would be impossible as a non-native speaker lol
Agreed.

There was a kid at my test center--native Chinese speaker and college English major--who was taking for his second time. The first time he'd gotten a 160. He wanted a 165 so that he could go to a "top 30" law school. I was impressed.

It was also funny to hear so many people fretting about RC, when it seems like for many native speakers the dragon in the closet is always LG.
True, non-native speakers may sometimes be at a disadvantage, but in many cases, knowing multiple languages could mean one can handle different languages with (almost) equal ease. I say this as a non-native speaker who had reverse scores on the SAT at least: much higher writing and verbal scores (99 percentile) than math(94 percentile).

User avatar
neptunestar

New
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by neptunestar » Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:53 am

Does anyone have numbers on how many people take the LSAT in Asia every year and what % of that is the total number of LSAT takers worldwide or even compared to the US?

Random question but just curious....

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by kazu » Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:18 am

PLATONiC wrote:I'd be neurotically obsessed if I didn't screw up that logic games section, because that means that I would have a chance at getting a really high score. I've pretty much given up on this possibility.
I'm neurotically obsessed because I really really think now that I've misbubbled.
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

User avatar
hemm

Bronze
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by hemm » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:16 am

I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.

User avatar
FutureApplicant

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by FutureApplicant » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:50 am

hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
Haha, I've been having the same feelings. Did I screw up the bubbling? Did I misread this question? Did I miss something on that question? Did I zone out for a few questions without really realizing it?

Hopefully we're all just panicking needlessly. Hopefully.

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by kazu » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:45 am

hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
Well, we still have a couple of days left to cancel..........................

Looks like I won't be able to sleep tonight either :evil:

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by beachbum » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:20 am

hemm wrote:I'm getting more and more worried that I completely bombed the test and there's nothing I can do about it, this is bad, bad, bad. UGH.
I had the exact same feeling. I almost canceled on the spot, then debated canceling for several days after the test. I was convinced I had gotten something in the range of 163-165 (after a PT average of 170), but decided to let it ride on the off-chance that I did better than expected (and wouldn't have to retake). My actual score: 170.

As far as the curve... it'll probably be more generous than you think. If I recall from the June 7 LSAT thread, just about everyone was predicting a curve around -10. Some of the crazier among us seemed to think it would be -11. The actual curve: -12. And it was only out of 99 questions (one was removed). (For what it's worth, I had a different screen name then, but decided to change it to better protect my identity).

And if you go back to the December 09 test thread, the curve predictions were about the same... until they got hit with that -14. Just sayin. It seems that a lot of us jump to negative conclusions about our test experience, but I wouldn't worry too much until you have your score in hand.

pjuls123

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by pjuls123 » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:05 pm

.
Last edited by pjuls123 on Fri May 18, 2012 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
PLATONiC

Bronze
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by PLATONiC » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:44 pm

-14 Curve = 170+

User avatar
SentinelsOfEvil

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:24 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by SentinelsOfEvil » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:55 pm

neptunestar wrote:Does anyone have numbers on how many people take the LSAT in Asia every year and what % of that is the total number of LSAT takers worldwide or even compared to the US?

Random question but just curious....
I'd love to know that too... The only info I can give you is that around 20 ppl took it in Singapore

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
hemm

Bronze
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by hemm » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:14 pm

Yeah I hope we're all freaking out for no reason. I felt good after the test, but now I'm remembering how little diagramming I did in the LR sections and how I changed a few answers before time ran out and thinking I could've made some big mistakes.

gschlabach

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:17 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by gschlabach » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:19 pm

SentinelsOfEvil wrote:The only info I can give you is that around 20 ppl took it in Singapore
There were 8 people taking it in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

User avatar
PLATONiC

Bronze
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by PLATONiC » Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:28 pm

There were nearly 200 people at my test center in Seoul, Korea.

User avatar
FutureApplicant

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:14 am

Re: Official June 27 2010 LSAT Waiting Thread (overseas takers)

Post by FutureApplicant » Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:07 am

kazu wrote:
yurishima wrote:These days are going by so slowly. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhh.
I know :cry:

However, there is also a significant lack of neurotic obsession in this thread. I feel like this contributes to time feeling even slower.


Last night I had a nightmare that I misbubbled a whole section. I woke up at 1am and couldn't sleep again until 5... and then had to wake up at 6:30 to go to work :(
Last night I had a nightmare about the LSAT as well, specifically the LG section. After that I had a dream about an ex-girlfriend. On balance, right now I'd rather be thinking about the ex-girlfriend.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”