I know, I'm mostly just arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd just hope that UG institution would be one of the last things that they look at when numbers are the same, and I'm sure it is.Alexandros wrote:I agree with what you're saying. But I mean, it's a soft factor that would only matter at the margins (a 3.9, 177, TTT UG application will beat out a 3.6, 170, HYP applicant any day) and the vast majority of applicants won't be HYP.oopsu812 wrote:Sounds like a great way for the select few to stay the select few, eh?Alexandros wrote:You're not getting disadvantaged because of it - You're just not getting the advantage a very select few do. The same goes for uber-prestigious internships or something. Soft factors favor the wealthy and the privileged.Anon-e-miss wrote:I agree, although there are many states with at least 1 good/great public school.oopsu812 wrote:I guess that's what happens when there are 2618 universities. Still think it's silly that someone could pick to go to their state school because they can't afford the crazy out of state or private school tuition, and be at a disadvantage because of it.
Also, numbers are still numbers, and numbers rule this process.
The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I assume this is true, although UG can have an impact on things like WE, research/publications, etc.oopsu812 wrote:I know, I'm mostly just arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd just hope that UG institution would be one of the last things that they look at when numbers are the same, and I'm sure it is.Alexandros wrote:I agree with what you're saying. But I mean, it's a soft factor that would only matter at the margins (a 3.9, 177, TTT UG application will beat out a 3.6, 170, HYP applicant any day) and the vast majority of applicants won't be HYP.oopsu812 wrote:Sounds like a great way for the select few to stay the select few, eh?Alexandros wrote:You're not getting disadvantaged because of it - You're just not getting the advantage a very select few do. The same goes for uber-prestigious internships or something. Soft factors favor the wealthy and the privileged.Anon-e-miss wrote:I agree, although there are many states with at least 1 good/great public school.oopsu812 wrote:I guess that's what happens when there are 2618 universities. Still think it's silly that someone could pick to go to their state school because they can't afford the crazy out of state or private school tuition, and be at a disadvantage because of it.
Also, numbers are still numbers, and numbers rule this process.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
It will be. And, I really think the UG prestige boost only matters at the extreme end (ie. at the level of HYP) - If it exists, it wouldn't matter or come into play at all for the vast majority of applicants.oopsu812 wrote:I know, I'm mostly just arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd just hope that UG institution would be one of the last things that they look at when numbers are the same, and I'm sure it is.Alexandros wrote:I agree with what you're saying. But I mean, it's a soft factor that would only matter at the margins (a 3.9, 177, TTT UG application will beat out a 3.6, 170, HYP applicant any day) and the vast majority of applicants won't be HYP.oopsu812 wrote:Sounds like a great way for the select few to stay the select few, eh?Alexandros wrote:You're not getting disadvantaged because of it - You're just not getting the advantage a very select few do. The same goes for uber-prestigious internships or something. Soft factors favor the wealthy and the privileged.Anon-e-miss wrote:I agree, although there are many states with at least 1 good/great public school.oopsu812 wrote:I guess that's what happens when there are 2618 universities. Still think it's silly that someone could pick to go to their state school because they can't afford the crazy out of state or private school tuition, and be at a disadvantage because of it.
Also, numbers are still numbers, and numbers rule this process.
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I agree, but now I can't put off doing my assignment to post in this thread now.Alexandros wrote:It will be. And, I really think the UG prestige boost only matters at the extreme end (ie. at the level of HYP) - If it exists, it wouldn't matter or come into play at all for the vast majority of applicants.oopsu812 wrote:I know, I'm mostly just arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd just hope that UG institution would be one of the last things that they look at when numbers are the same, and I'm sure it is.Alexandros wrote:I agree with what you're saying. But I mean, it's a soft factor that would only matter at the margins (a 3.9, 177, TTT UG application will beat out a 3.6, 170, HYP applicant any day) and the vast majority of applicants won't be HYP.oopsu812 wrote:Sounds like a great way for the select few to stay the select few, eh?Alexandros wrote:You're not getting disadvantaged because of it - You're just not getting the advantage a very select few do. The same goes for uber-prestigious internships or something. Soft factors favor the wealthy and the privileged.Anon-e-miss wrote:I agree, although there are many states with at least 1 good/great public school.oopsu812 wrote:I guess that's what happens when there are 2618 universities. Still think it's silly that someone could pick to go to their state school because they can't afford the crazy out of state or private school tuition, and be at a disadvantage because of it.
Also, numbers are still numbers, and numbers rule this process.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Seriously thinking about getting a new gym for the summer.
also why can't ppl leave poor Alex alone.
also why can't ppl leave poor Alex alone.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- littlelibertine

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 9:25 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Welcome to North Carolina. I'm about forty minutes from you.chargers21 wrote:Duke, my favorite school out of where I applied this cyclechewinggum wrote:Where are you headed?chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
- chargers21

- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Thanks! I think I'm going to enjoy it, and actually plan on staying in the state after graduating!littlelibertine wrote:Welcome to North Carolina. I'm about forty minutes from you.chargers21 wrote:Duke, my favorite school out of where I applied this cyclechewinggum wrote:Where are you headed?chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Why are people messing with my boy?Alexandros wrote:Seriously thinking about getting a new gym for the summer.
also why can't ppl leave poor Alex alone.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
<3jagerbom79 wrote:Why are people messing with my boy?Alexandros wrote:Seriously thinking about getting a new gym for the summer.
also why can't ppl leave poor Alex alone.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
The mastermind should be back up for sale the 26th. not pedaling them but I want another and figured it's the better lsat watch out there
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I pre-ordered just in case.dj9i27 wrote:The mastermind should be back up for sale the 26th. not pedaling them but I want another and figured it's the better lsat watch out there
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
considering i'm a splitter.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- littlelibertine

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 9:25 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
x
Last edited by littlelibertine on Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
saf18hornet

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
No, there is zero downside to retaking. I'd never tell someone not to use as many takes as they can afforddj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
below 25th percentile above 75 percentile. This thread has a lot of splitters and no one should apply to Stanford but me, k? k.littlelibertine wrote:same. although, how low does your UG GPA have to be to be considered a split? I had a 3.55 -- could've had a 3.8ish but got sick and fucked off my last semester. :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
My GPA is actually really good for my major, too bad it's TTT in Lawl world
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
So... Alex should retake?saf18hornet wrote:No, there is zero downside to retaking. I'd never tell someone not to use as many takes as they can afforddj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Splitters are hard to predict but LSN and LSP are decent predictors.chewinggum wrote:Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
LSP is where operation false hope starts because it says Stanford and Harvard are my "Goal Schools" with a 177+ Lmao no
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
There are a few super splitters on here (2.9/177, 3.1/161) who've gotten into NYU and Columbia with money. So I'm praying for a miracle.dj9i27 wrote:Splitters are hard to predict but LSN and LSP are decent predictors.chewinggum wrote:Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
LSP is where operation false hope starts because it says Stanford and Harvard are my "Goal Schools" with a 177+ Lmao no
I need to elevate my test prep.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
URM?chewinggum wrote:There are a few super splitters on here (2.9/177, 3.1/161) who've gotten into NYU and Columbia with money. So I'm praying for a miracle.dj9i27 wrote:Splitters are hard to predict but LSN and LSP are decent predictors.chewinggum wrote:Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
LSP is where operation false hope starts because it says Stanford and Harvard are my "Goal Schools" with a 177+ Lmao no
I need to elevate my test prep.
I picked up the Blueprint LG the other day because it was payday and why not. It is pretty easy to read akin to the Trainer, might be able to finish it this weekend.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
3.1/161 was URM, 2.9/177 was not.dj9i27 wrote:URM?chewinggum wrote:There are a few super splitters on here (2.9/177, 3.1/161) who've gotten into NYU and Columbia with money. So I'm praying for a miracle.dj9i27 wrote:Splitters are hard to predict but LSN and LSP are decent predictors.chewinggum wrote:Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
LSP is where operation false hope starts because it says Stanford and Harvard are my "Goal Schools" with a 177+ Lmao no
I need to elevate my test prep.
I picked up the Blueprint LG the other day because it was payday and why not. It is pretty easy to read akin to the Trainer, might be able to finish it this weekend.
Is LG your biggest hurdle?
I might want to get a 180 just to be safe
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
damn, sub 3 is rare with money. STANNY HOPE PLEASE.chewinggum wrote:3.1/161 was URM, 2.9/177 was not.dj9i27 wrote:URM?chewinggum wrote:There are a few super splitters on here (2.9/177, 3.1/161) who've gotten into NYU and Columbia with money. So I'm praying for a miracle.dj9i27 wrote:Splitters are hard to predict but LSN and LSP are decent predictors.chewinggum wrote:Any idea how splitters do at NYU? Is there any data on these stats on tls?dj9i27 wrote:Splitters do well at CLS.. SLS is a different story :/chewinggum wrote:I have these fantasies about my reaction to getting accepted to NYU/Columbia but I don't want to jinx myself when my score is not where it needs to be.
considering i'm a splitter.
LSP is where operation false hope starts because it says Stanford and Harvard are my "Goal Schools" with a 177+ Lmao no
I need to elevate my test prep.
I picked up the Blueprint LG the other day because it was payday and why not. It is pretty easy to read akin to the Trainer, might be able to finish it this weekend.
Is LG your biggest hurdle?
I might want to get a 180 just to be safe
not really, but the weird games trip me up something fierce. Figured I can alleviate it with lots of books. RC is my most inconsistent section by far.
I want a 180 so bad, I read NoodleOne, PP. and other 180 guides on a consistent basis.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
seriously tho only 100 people apply to SLS so I have a chance .
- chewinggum

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Same. RC is annoying for me mostly because of time. If it was 2 singles and 2 comparative life would be so much easier and my skin would be clear.dj9i27 wrote: damn, sub 3 is rare with money. STANNY HOPE PLEASE.
not really, but the weird games trip me up something fierce. Figured I can alleviate it with lots of books. RC is my most inconsistent section by far.
I want a 180 so bad, I read NoodleOne, PP. and other 180 guides on a consistent basis.
How long have you been studying?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login