The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS Forum
- thatlawlkid
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Anyone have any suggestions on staying organized regarding prep? Retakers especially. Tracking what you've done, what you're panning on doing for the week. anything like that. I have access to almost every prep test(taken about half of them. Mostly 40s-60s), the cambridge packets and the powerscore LGbundles for 21-40 and maybe 1-20.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- galeatus
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:53 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
I just make up a really simple spreadsheet, nothing fancy, only with PT number, PT results and BR results, and a few graphs here and there just to keep me sane.thatlawlkid wrote:Anyone have any suggestions on staying organized regarding prep? Retakers especially. Tracking what you've done, what you're panning on doing for the week. anything like that. I have access to almost every prep test(taken about half of them. Mostly 40s-60s), the cambridge packets and the powerscore LGbundles for 21-40 and maybe 1-20.
Thanks!
I don't track my Cambridge packets as I just do them until I feel confident, so tracking doesn't really help much, but I guess you can add a sheet to the spreadsheet for those.
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
I don't know how you all prep in cafe's. I tried it out yesterday, didn't work out so well. Let's just say almost ALL the questions I did at the cafe I got wrong (all the conversations that were surrounding me didn't help either..).
I just finished MBF questions, went -2 on the remaining 7 questions. One was a stupid mistake, once I identified what I thought was the false answer I didn't leave room in my brain for a potential false choice. When I looked at the answer though and came up with a resulting scenario, I realized my mistake. The other question, I can see why the one I chose is wrong (I was choosing between the correct answer choice and the one I went with), but no idea why the right one is correct.
So, I'll be spending the next two hours doing heavy review. Never doing LSAT prep in a cafe again lol.
I just finished MBF questions, went -2 on the remaining 7 questions. One was a stupid mistake, once I identified what I thought was the false answer I didn't leave room in my brain for a potential false choice. When I looked at the answer though and came up with a resulting scenario, I realized my mistake. The other question, I can see why the one I chose is wrong (I was choosing between the correct answer choice and the one I went with), but no idea why the right one is correct.
So, I'll be spending the next two hours doing heavy review. Never doing LSAT prep in a cafe again lol.
- thatlawlkid
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
PT 54 with an exp LR as soon as my warm up is over. Leggo
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
I've decided that for the next 2 and a half weeks, since my job has started, I'll drill in the morning and evening, doing 1 LG, 1 RC, and 1 LR per day.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Aaannd again.
PT 57:
LG: -1
LR experimental: 0
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
RC: -1
Raw: 94
Scaled: 174
Same exact raw score on the last 4 PTs now.
I guess at least I'm showing uh... consistency? I mean, I'm glad it didn't dip down at least, because I wasn't feeling great about this one.
-5 on LR is way too low. This is a problem. Briefly checked them and 2 were obvious misreading/misdiagramming, the other 3 I'm going to have to look at more.
(side note -- does anyone get else hella anxious marking PTs? got such bad heart palpitations marking this one I about had to stop. jfc.)
PT 57:
LG: -1
LR experimental: 0
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
RC: -1
Raw: 94
Scaled: 174
Same exact raw score on the last 4 PTs now.

-5 on LR is way too low. This is a problem. Briefly checked them and 2 were obvious misreading/misdiagramming, the other 3 I'm going to have to look at more.
(side note -- does anyone get else hella anxious marking PTs? got such bad heart palpitations marking this one I about had to stop. jfc.)
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
For each PT/section I do, i just keep note of it in a word document. I guess using a spreadsheet would be more organized, but it works fine for me.thatlawlkid wrote:Anyone have any suggestions on staying organized regarding prep? Retakers especially. Tracking what you've done, what you're panning on doing for the week. anything like that. I have access to almost every prep test(taken about half of them. Mostly 40s-60s), the cambridge packets and the powerscore LGbundles for 21-40 and maybe 1-20.
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
I am terrible with distractions too. General far-away background noises are okay but I had to move during the last PT because the people near me in the library were whispering really intensely. (idk if that's cheating.)ngogirl12 wrote:I don't know how you all prep in cafe's. I tried it out yesterday, didn't work out so well. Let's just say almost ALL the questions I did at the cafe I got wrong (all the conversations that were surrounding me didn't help either..).
I just finished MBF questions, went -2 on the remaining 7 questions. One was a stupid mistake, once I identified what I thought was the false answer I didn't leave room in my brain for a potential false choice. When I looked at the answer though and came up with a resulting scenario, I realized my mistake. The other question, I can see why the one I chose is wrong (I was choosing between the correct answer choice and the one I went with), but no idea why the right one is correct.
So, I'll be spending the next two hours doing heavy review. Never doing LSAT prep in a cafe again lol.
Going to have to gauge of how much distractions are going to factor into things on test day. I'm hoping not too much because closed room and all that but you never know.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
174 is pretty good, but I remember you saying that your goal is higher. At this point, I think your points off are just from mistakes because you clearly know your shit, so I would just advise being more careful with it. This is obviously easier said than done, but you just gotta keep at it bro.Alexandros wrote:Aaannd again.
PT 57:
LG: -1
LR experimental: 0
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
RC: -1
Raw: 94
Scaled: 174
Same exact raw score on the last 4 PTs now.I guess at least I'm showing uh... consistency? I mean, I'm glad it didn't dip down at least, because I wasn't feeling great about this one.
-5 on LR is way too low. This is a problem. Briefly checked them and 2 were obvious misreading/misdiagramming, the other 3 I'm going to have to look at more.
(side note -- does anyone get else hella anxious marking PTs? got such bad heart palpitations marking this one I about had to stop. jfc.)
I get nervous as fuck when I mark ONE QUESTION lol. Even if it's a question that I know I destroyed and got 100% right, there's always that feeling that I got everything that I do wrong, lmao.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Yeah, I think you're right. I do feel like my potential is higher (knockonwoodknockonwood) but I haven't been able to hit it. I'm not sure if the best approach here would be more drilling or more PTs or what. I guess we'll see.TheMikey wrote:174 is pretty good, but I remember you saying that your goal is higher. At this point, I think your points off are just from mistakes because you clearly know your shit, so I would just advise being more careful with it. This is obviously easier said than done, but you just gotta keep at it bro.Alexandros wrote:Aaannd again.
PT 57:
LG: -1
LR experimental: 0
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
RC: -1
Raw: 94
Scaled: 174
Same exact raw score on the last 4 PTs now.I guess at least I'm showing uh... consistency? I mean, I'm glad it didn't dip down at least, because I wasn't feeling great about this one.
-5 on LR is way too low. This is a problem. Briefly checked them and 2 were obvious misreading/misdiagramming, the other 3 I'm going to have to look at more.
(side note -- does anyone get else hella anxious marking PTs? got such bad heart palpitations marking this one I about had to stop. jfc.)
I get nervous as fuck when I mark ONE QUESTION lol. Even if it's a question that I know I destroyed and got 100% right, there's always that feeling that I got everything that I do wrong, lmao.
Yeah, I have to look at a chunk of questions ahead, see that they're all consistent with my answers, and then convince myself to keep marking
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Haha thanks.Barack O'Drama wrote:34iplaw wrote:Best of luck with the 180. I wouldn't get disheartened. Anything above a 176-177 or so has a slight hint of luck to it. You start to get penalized so heavily for a question that you could lose a point just from not reading a "the", a "only", etc.Shemp wrote:My apologies, I haven't read the past 188 pages of this thread and just skimmed what was on this page before posting. Clearly I need a little work on my reading comprehension skills.
Anywho... finished most of my macro that automatically writes my questions to a word document. About the only thing I could improve upon is finding a way to check whether the most recently typed question would break columns, and, if so, insert a column break before it so that it fits two or more questions per column when possible. If anyone knows that, hit me up...using a typetext method...it's kind of funny to watch it type really fast. If anyone decides to make a spreadsheet of questions they missed, feel free to use a variant of this to plug it to word... made some note next to where you need to modify it
Damn you are the man! You do coding, LSAT, and are an incredible writer!
That is so awesome! Thank you so much for this
If interested I can send you the workbook sans questions. It has mildly improved code so you don't need to into VBA to adjust be ranges anymore and it will do it automatically.
I really want to find out a way to find out if the question splits. I think I can probably get around it in a less than ideal fashion.
It also has a sheet that displays one question at a time with the answer hidden but you can reveal it. Either in order or randomly. I could add a filter by type but I'm not going to use that so I probably won't. Made for current excel but should work in all versions.
Anywho. Taking today easy. Diag tomorrow. Also did not sleep well last night. Maybe do one or two RC passages.
Sample sale (maybe for myself maybe to sell) and dinner with friends.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Been going at some high level difficulty LR questions from the cambridge book today. Did 2/3 from each Q type of the hardest difficulty and have been reviewing them for a bit. Feeling good today about the LSAT so decided to do something for it instead of waiting another day. Also did that LG section this morning -3 (34:50)
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Yeah, I'm definitely guilty of doing that. The whole point of a library is to be quiet not sit and whisper or chat about your life lol.Alexandros wrote:I am terrible with distractions too. General far-away background noises are okay but I had to move during the last PT because the people near me in the library were whispering really intensely. (idk if that's cheating.)ngogirl12 wrote:I don't know how you all prep in cafe's. I tried it out yesterday, didn't work out so well. Let's just say almost ALL the questions I did at the cafe I got wrong (all the conversations that were surrounding me didn't help either..).
I just finished MBF questions, went -2 on the remaining 7 questions. One was a stupid mistake, once I identified what I thought was the false answer I didn't leave room in my brain for a potential false choice. When I looked at the answer though and came up with a resulting scenario, I realized my mistake. The other question, I can see why the one I chose is wrong (I was choosing between the correct answer choice and the one I went with), but no idea why the right one is correct.
So, I'll be spending the next two hours doing heavy review. Never doing LSAT prep in a cafe again lol.
Going to have to gauge of how much distractions are going to factor into things on test day. I'm hoping not too much because closed room and all that but you never know.
I'm actually going to take all my PT's at the library just to get used to hearing the movement/rustling of papers, pen/pencils on paper etc.
You should google simugator and your lsat test center so something like "simugator mcgill university lsat test center rating" (I'm saying McGill bc I remember you saying your from Canada). They have reviews for all the test centers and Wikipedia has one too. I know they have reviews for most of the centers in the U.S., if that doesn't work you could always post a topic here. But, yeah I am hoping those reviews are accurate lol.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Think I'm gonna spend a few hours looking at books for my hopefully law-related senior thesis.
RC practice!

- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Yeah luckily its just an internship and this upcoming week is my last week. Its in the finance industry. Its been real tough, but luckily I have no obligations until Sept when school starts up again for me.appind wrote:that's impressive. somehow my around 8-9 hr work is more than i can chew. what's your work?jagerbom79 wrote:Been doing this great advice!!! easiest way for me to get some LSAT related studying in at work too, low-key.SweetTort wrote:Alexandros wrote:Another copy of the Economist showed up. Going to try the memory method on them, or at least timed reading with LSAT style notation.
Yeeeeaaaahhh booooiiiii
I have been working late nights ~10-11PM which is-12 - 14.5 hr days, but ive gotten in a decent amt of studying/drilling. Not as much as I would like but im almost done and can be full-time studying again real soon. Monday night was the only day I got <1 hr in. The Grind is real but thats what its all about
i think i'd prefer taking lsat while full time studying during a semester than lsat with any kind of job
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
This one has Canada ratings: http://lsatcenters.wikia.com/wiki/LSAT_Test_Center_Wiki, and so does 7Sage.Alexandros wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm trying to do too. And mornings-ish. Those factors alone can make a huge difference.ngogirl12 wrote:Yeah, I'm definitely guilty of doing that. The whole point of a library is to be quiet not sit and whisper or chat about your life lol.Alexandros wrote:I am terrible with distractions too. General far-away background noises are okay but I had to move during the last PT because the people near me in the library were whispering really intensely. (idk if that's cheating.)ngogirl12 wrote:I don't know how you all prep in cafe's. I tried it out yesterday, didn't work out so well. Let's just say almost ALL the questions I did at the cafe I got wrong (all the conversations that were surrounding me didn't help either..).
I just finished MBF questions, went -2 on the remaining 7 questions. One was a stupid mistake, once I identified what I thought was the false answer I didn't leave room in my brain for a potential false choice. When I looked at the answer though and came up with a resulting scenario, I realized my mistake. The other question, I can see why the one I chose is wrong (I was choosing between the correct answer choice and the one I went with), but no idea why the right one is correct.
So, I'll be spending the next two hours doing heavy review. Never doing LSAT prep in a cafe again lol.
Going to have to gauge of how much distractions are going to factor into things on test day. I'm hoping not too much because closed room and all that but you never know.
I'm actually going to take all my PT's at the library just to get used to hearing the movement/rustling of papers, pen/pencils on paper etc.
You should google simugator and your lsat test center so something like "simugator mcgill university lsat test center rating" (I'm saying McGill bc I remember you saying your from Canada). They have reviews for all the test centers and Wikipedia has one too. I know they have reviews for most of the centers in the U.S., if that doesn't work you could always post a topic here. But, yeah I am hoping those reviews are accurate lol.
I don't think simugators has schools in Canada? Unless I'm deeply mistaken... A few irl people have told me some things though, and I've gathered that there are different rooms and rooms and buildings vary.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
if it's only internship it shouldn't be too bad. mostly it's if you've been working full time for a while it begins to take it's toll and i think at least also wears down one's academic acuity if you will.jagerbom79 wrote:Yeah luckily its just an internship and this upcoming week is my last week. Its in the finance industry. Its been real tough, but luckily I have no obligations until Sept when school starts up again for me.appind wrote:that's impressive. somehow my around 8-9 hr work is more than i can chew. what's your work?jagerbom79 wrote:Been doing this great advice!!! easiest way for me to get some LSAT related studying in at work too, low-key.SweetTort wrote:Alexandros wrote:Another copy of the Economist showed up. Going to try the memory method on them, or at least timed reading with LSAT style notation.
Yeeeeaaaahhh booooiiiii
I have been working late nights ~10-11PM which is-12 - 14.5 hr days, but ive gotten in a decent amt of studying/drilling. Not as much as I would like but im almost done and can be full-time studying again real soon. Monday night was the only day I got <1 hr in. The Grind is real but thats what its all about
i think i'd prefer taking lsat while full time studying during a semester than lsat with any kind of job
may not hold for everyone, but i think being student full time during a semester makes one kinda more ready for any type of intellectual tests like lsat
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Decided not to PT again until test day. In order to avoid burnout and to balance other obligations, I'll be doing 1 full section of each subject each day until the test. So, 3/5 of a PT per day. I think it will keep me fresh and take some pressure off prep.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
holy molyShemp wrote:Okay, I'm throwing my hat in the ring. I hope that everyone else who studied for the February 2015 test has since gone on to bigger and better things and forgotten all about me. I got a 175 then and was really pretty disappointed by it. I'm aware how douchey that seems, but my preptest results really were indicating that I was capable of scoring higher. I haven't systematically studied LSAT since then, but I do logic games pretty frequently for fun. I love tests and the LSAT is definitely my favorite one. I'm going to really try for 180 in September and possibly December also. I still haven't talked myself into law school, but if I can get a 180 then I might not be able to resist.
I see someone a couple posts above this saying that the secret to reading comp is to read as fast as possible. I don't think that's the case at all. When I read something in real life I cruise along at somewhere around 400-500 wpm, but on a reading comp passage I try to imagine either Obama, Bill Clinton, or JFK speaking the words in my head. This slows me down enough to get a much better understanding of what I'm reading. If you're on the other end of the political spectrum maybe try reading it in Reagan's voice or anyone else who has a distinctive oratory style that's easy for you to imagine. It doesn't work for me to read it in my own voice because I trained myself out of that years ago in order to read faster. In the case of reading comp, I think that taking three minutes to read and digest a passage is way better than taking a minute and a half to fly through it with poor comprehension.
shemp's back!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Oh god, so since i was doing 2 or 3 highest level difficulty questions from each Q type in the cambridge book, there was this 1 flaw question that I could not for the life of me understand. I understood the argument, and the right answer was phrased in a way that I would NOT have expected it to be, even though my pre-phrase was accurate, but NONE of the answer choices made any sense and I spent so much time on that questions. After reading explanations, I still couldn't get it, and then finally, *light bulb* i had that "ooooooooh" moment as to why the A/C was worded the way it was and why it was right.
- YupSports
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 5:45 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
Drilled the Cambridge Sufficient Assumption packet over the past 2 days - feeling much more confident in my skills.
Focusing on the Necessary Assumption packet this entire upcoming week, as it is much larger.
Focusing on the Necessary Assumption packet this entire upcoming week, as it is much larger.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
I'm really surprised I got all the questions in the "Chinese Talk-Story" passage correct, that one was tough!
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS
i think slowing down has helped me improve a little bit on RC as well. but slowing down on an RC passage for me means like 4.5 to 5.5 min reading the passage instead of usual 3-3:30 min. that's clearly not like slowing down from 1:30 min to 3 or 3:30 mins to read the passage. naturally that leaves me not enough time to do the questions fully as doing 7 questions in 3 mins is almost impossible even if you've read the passage very well.Shemp wrote: I see someone a couple posts above this saying that the secret to reading comp is to read as fast as possible. I don't think that's the case at all. When I read something in real life I cruise along at somewhere around 400-500 wpm, but on a reading comp passage I try to imagine either Obama, Bill Clinton, or JFK speaking the words in my head. This slows me down enough to get a much better understanding of what I'm reading. If you're on the other end of the political spectrum maybe try reading it in Reagan's voice or anyone else who has a distinctive oratory style that's easy for you to imagine. It doesn't work for me to read it in my own voice because I trained myself out of that years ago in order to read faster. In the case of reading comp, I think that taking three minutes to read and digest a passage is way better than taking a minute and a half to fly through it with poor comprehension.
how did you train to not read in your own voice and in someone else's? do you mean no subvocalization? i thought it wasn't possible to have no subvocalization.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login