The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

Are you ready for tomorrow?!?!?!

FUCK YES
20
39%
Yeah, kind of
8
16%
Ehh, hoping for the best
7
14%
Not prepared but screw it
3
6%
HAHAHA I'M NOT EVEN TAKING THE LSAT, SUCKS FOR YOU GUYS
13
25%
 
Total votes: 51

User avatar
MediocreAtBest

Silver
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by MediocreAtBest » Tue May 16, 2017 11:34 am

34iplaw wrote:Yeah - people are exaggerating. I could see there be more 160s, as I do sincerely a low 160s/high 150s is obtainable by a much larger portion of the test-taking population than actually receives it. You will likely see slightly more 170s but not an earth shattering amount. I forget the stat, but don't most (or near most) not go up on a second take? It'll help people score near the top of their range, reduce stress on the test, and, yes, some will take the test umpteenth times and perhaps get really lucky one time. I don't see much movement for top scores.
I agree, there will probably only be a handful of improvement near the top, maybe people who were stuck at 165+ decide to give it one more shot or something, but probably not much difference in the top 5%.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Mikey » Tue May 16, 2017 11:41 am

I believe there will definitely still be tons of people who refuse to retake regardless of how many takes they can do

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by dj9i27 » Tue May 16, 2017 11:45 am

Mikey wrote:I believe there will definitely still be tons of people who refuse to retake regardless of how many takes they can do
I am now 178 or bust

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 11:54 am

I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me

User avatar
chewinggum

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chewinggum » Tue May 16, 2017 11:55 am

.
Last edited by chewinggum on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:05 am, edited 2 times in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
chewinggum

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chewinggum » Tue May 16, 2017 11:55 am

chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
Where are you headed?

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by dj9i27 » Tue May 16, 2017 11:56 am

chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
I don't want to say bail but... What was your graduation year?

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 12:01 pm

34iplaw wrote:Yeah - people are exaggerating. I could see there be more 160s, as I do sincerely a low 160s/high 150s is obtainable by a much larger portion of the test-taking population than actually receives it. You will likely see slightly more 170s but not an earth shattering amount. I forget the stat, but don't most (or near most) not go up on a second take? It'll help people score near the top of their range, reduce stress on the test, and, yes, some will take the test umpteenth times and perhaps get really lucky one time. I don't see much movement for top scores.
Yeah, inclined to agree.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 12:04 pm

I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Npret

Gold
Posts: 1986
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Npret » Tue May 16, 2017 12:04 pm

chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
You know you can still withdraw if you aren't getting what you want. Leases are broken all the time. It's not a difficult commitment to end.

Npret

Gold
Posts: 1986
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Npret » Tue May 16, 2017 12:06 pm

Alexandros wrote:I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.
Why?
You can also apply and then defer an acceptance (as I know you know) if you want to wait.

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 12:09 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
I don't want to say bail but... What was your graduation year?
2016. Problem is, I'm deposited at my #2 choice school. The school I would still want to go to if I didn't get H. I feel like backing out of my deposit is a good way to piss them off for next cycle. Plus, if I hit my PT average, the scholarship tiering at Duke would not net me a crazy amount of extra cash

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 12:10 pm

Npret wrote:
chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
You know you can still withdraw if you aren't getting what you want. Leases are broken all the time. It's not a difficult commitment to end.
I'm at the school I want, it just would have been nice to have another chance to get some more money from them

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 12:11 pm

chewinggum wrote:
chargers21 wrote:I am upset about this change not coming a year sooner now that I am already deposited and signing a lease. Retaking in June would have been killer for me
Where are you headed?
Duke, my favorite school out of where I applied this cycle

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 12:17 pm

Npret wrote:
Alexandros wrote:I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.
Why?
You can also apply and then defer an acceptance (as I know you know) if you want to wait.
I'm not sure how deferrals work for scholarships and such so I don't want to bank on that.

The biggest pluses of time off would be having a better time affirmatively figuring if I want to go into law and having WE when I apply, both of which would be the largest benefit prior to applications. Hard to know if that (at least the latter) would be cancelled out by having the strongest part of my app (LSAT) be devalued.

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 12:21 pm

Alexandros wrote:
Npret wrote:
Alexandros wrote:I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.
Why?
You can also apply and then defer an acceptance (as I know you know) if you want to wait.
I'm not sure how deferrals work for scholarships and such so I don't want to bank on that.

The biggest pluses of time off would be having a better time affirmatively figuring if I want to go into law and having WE when I apply, both of which would be the largest benefit prior to applications. Hard to know if that (at least the latter) would be cancelled out by having the strongest part of my app (LSAT) be devalued.
Super high LSATs won't be hurt by this change. I think the biggest shifts will be the high 150s bumping to low 160s and high 160s bumping to low 170s. People capable of 175+ will always be limited

Npret

Gold
Posts: 1986
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Npret » Tue May 16, 2017 12:22 pm

Alexandros wrote:
Npret wrote:
Alexandros wrote:I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.
Why?
You can also apply and then defer an acceptance (as I know you know) if you want to wait.
I'm not sure how deferrals work for scholarships and such so I don't want to bank on that.

The biggest pluses of time off would be having a better time affirmatively figuring if I want to go into law and having WE when I apply, both of which would be the largest benefit prior to applications. Hard to know if that (at least the latter) would be cancelled out by having the strongest part of my app (LSAT) be devalued.
Despite my advocacy for the changes, I don't see a high LSAT being devalued in one or two years. Why not ask Spivey what he thinks? To me, it's worth the investing time to be sure you want law as a career.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 12:32 pm

Npret wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
Npret wrote:
Alexandros wrote:I've been considering taking an additional year off but all of these changes are kind of discouraging me from doing so.
Why?
You can also apply and then defer an acceptance (as I know you know) if you want to wait.
I'm not sure how deferrals work for scholarships and such so I don't want to bank on that.

The biggest pluses of time off would be having a better time affirmatively figuring if I want to go into law and having WE when I apply, both of which would be the largest benefit prior to applications. Hard to know if that (at least the latter) would be cancelled out by having the strongest part of my app (LSAT) be devalued.
Despite my advocacy for the changes, I don't see a high LSAT being devalued in one or two years. Why not ask Spivey what he thinks? To me, it's worth the investing time to be sure you want law as a career.
Putting it off for an additional year would be applying in ~3 cycles. But yeah, you're absolutely right. Not worth sacrificing life plans for the chance that a 99.9%ile LSAT would be devalued.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 12:48 pm

This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by chargers21 » Tue May 16, 2017 12:50 pm

Alexandros wrote:This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?
Yupp. 100%.

User avatar
twiix

Silver
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:41 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by twiix » Tue May 16, 2017 1:06 pm

chargers21 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?
Yupp. 100%.
they're feeling the pressure.
[+] Spoiler
Image

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
oopsu812

Silver
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by oopsu812 » Tue May 16, 2017 1:20 pm

Alexandros wrote:This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?
Totally, suits me just fine though.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by dj9i27 » Tue May 16, 2017 1:28 pm

Alexandros wrote:This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?
I feel like Harvard only accepted the GRE to try and jump stanny again.

Totally submitting both my skore to H lel

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by Alexandros » Tue May 16, 2017 1:42 pm

.
Last edited by Alexandros on Fri Jun 09, 2017 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Post by dj9i27 » Tue May 16, 2017 1:46 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:This is gotta be LSAC responding to the GRE thing though, yeah?
I feel like Harvard only accepted the GRE to try and jump stanny again.

Totally submitting both my skore to H lel
You totally should.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MyNameIsNeo
... numbers twin too... Y no stanny

Also Mikey, this test should have 0 anxiety for you now

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”