Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Me too mate! Almost there. I have no clue, but when do you take it,again?dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Sep2K16jagerbom79 wrote:Me too mate! Almost there. I have no clue, but when do you take it,again?dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
Aka disaster #1
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Hahah yeah i know that. I was apart of that disaster too. I meant when is the digital lsat you are taking?dj9i27 wrote:Sep2K16jagerbom79 wrote:Me too mate! Almost there. I have no clue, but when do you take it,again?dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
Aka disaster #1
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Dunno if the test itself will be but you'll get your score breakdown and whatnot according to LSAC.dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
"A detailed performance report listing the number of questions you answered correctly for each of the three LSAT question types (Analytical Reasoning, Logical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension) and the number answered correctly for each of several skill areas within each LSAT question type. "
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I really hope it is especially if it is a weird game on it. I think they are going to make this baby easy or hell hard, my goal is high 160s low 170s since I haven't PTd in a while. Totally bringing the mastermind.Alexandros wrote:Dunno if the test itself will be but you'll get your score breakdown and whatnot according to LSAC.dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
"A detailed performance report listing the number of questions you answered correctly for each of the three LSAT question types (Analytical Reasoning, Logical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension) and the number answered correctly for each of several skill areas within each LSAT question type. "
OH, this saturday.jagerbom79 wrote:Hahah yeah i know that. I was apart of that disaster too. I meant when is the digital lsat you are taking?dj9i27 wrote:Sep2K16jagerbom79 wrote:Me too mate! Almost there. I have no clue, but when do you take it,again?dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
Aka disaster #1
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Ahh okaydj9i27 wrote:I really hope it is especially if it is a weird game on it. I think they are going to make this baby easy or hell hard, my goal is high 160s low 170s since I haven't PTd in a while. Totally bringing the mastermind.Alexandros wrote:Dunno if the test itself will be but you'll get your score breakdown and whatnot according to LSAC.dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
"A detailed performance report listing the number of questions you answered correctly for each of the three LSAT question types (Analytical Reasoning, Logical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension) and the number answered correctly for each of several skill areas within each LSAT question type. "OH, this saturday.jagerbom79 wrote:Hahah yeah i know that. I was apart of that disaster too. I meant when is the digital lsat you are taking?dj9i27 wrote:Sep2K16jagerbom79 wrote:Me too mate! Almost there. I have no clue, but when do you take it,again?dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
Aka disaster #1
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong
]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Dude, that's a great result! You have more than enough time between now and September to get that 175+.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I would guess average - it's a pilot, after all, and they don't want to get inflated or deflated results.dj9i27 wrote:I really hope it is especially if it is a weird game on it. I think they are going to make this baby easy or hell hard, my goal is high 160s low 170s since I haven't PTd in a while. Totally bringing the mastermind.Alexandros wrote:Dunno if the test itself will be but you'll get your score breakdown and whatnot according to LSAC.dj9i27 wrote:inb4 156Alexandros wrote:Good thing you'll be done soon!dj9i27 wrote:I just realized I've been studying for this fucking thing for a year on and off... mostly on.
does anyone know if the digital lsat is disclosed?
"A detailed performance report listing the number of questions you answered correctly for each of the three LSAT question types (Analytical Reasoning, Logical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension) and the number answered correctly for each of several skill areas within each LSAT question type. "
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Congrats!! Fantastic place to be this far out.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Thanks!oopsu812 wrote:Dude, that's a great result! You have more than enough time between now and September to get that 175+.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
I was really happy with the quick improvement I am noticing on LR questions so I hope to keep that ball rolling. Now I need to work on conquering these pesky logic games. The combined sequencing-grouping games seem to be an obvious weakness right now.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Thanks. Probably good that I didn't do exceedingly well; don't want to get complacent too early #180orbust #wouldsettlefor175crewAlexandros wrote:Congrats!! Fantastic place to be this far out.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Nothing less than 177. prove yourself to HYSAnon-e-miss wrote:Thanks. Probably good that I didn't do exceedingly well; don't want to get complacent too early #180orbust #wouldsettlefor175crewAlexandros wrote:Congrats!! Fantastic place to be this far out.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Stanny let in like 3 ppl on LSN with a GPA below 3.9 ((upside down smiley face))
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
175 seems to prove enough to H, according to LSN. Would probably have to go back in time and drop that freshman year Calc class to have a shot at Yale or Stanforddj9i27 wrote:Nothing less than 177. prove yourself to HYSAnon-e-miss wrote:Thanks. Probably good that I didn't do exceedingly well; don't want to get complacent too early #180orbust #wouldsettlefor175crewAlexandros wrote:Congrats!! Fantastic place to be this far out.Anon-e-miss wrote:Just took PT 7 as my first ~official~ practice test. I didn't do an experimental section but stuck to a strict administration otherwise.
LR - 4 (-2/-2)
LG - 5 [didn't finish two so I filled B and got them both wrong]
RC - 5
Ended up with an 87/101 for a 170.
I am pretty satisfied for the first go-around, although I really wanted to hit 172 to boost my confidence for achieving a 175+ score. Oh well.
Still have to go through the RC Bible, so hopefully I can improve there while improving on LG with drills.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I really don't think there's much, if any, advantage of 177+ over 175+.
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Just registered for September!! Wohoooo. SHOW ME THE MONEEYYYY
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Prob not too much because of the score bandAlexandros wrote:I really don't think there's much, if any, advantage of 177+ over 175+.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I think the score band is 176-180, but yeah thinking more 75ths - Y is sometimes 176 but I doubt they really gaf about maintaining that. (obviously everyone should shoot for 180 but still.)jagerbom79 wrote:Prob not too much because of the score band (Cant remember what the +/- is)Alexandros wrote:I really don't think there's much, if any, advantage of 177+ over 175+.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Gimme dat Columbia $$Alexandros wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jebbush2k16dj9i27 wrote:
-
Anon-e-miss

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Very interested in this "Public Interest Fellowship" at Columbia. Have seen it mentioned on LSN profiles but not in the same vein as RTK, Toll, etc. Is this a new thing? Is it widely advertised?Alexandros wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jebbush2k16dj9i27 wrote:
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Okay, yea i know what you mean. I can see that as well.Alexandros wrote:I think the score band is 176-180, but yeah thinking more 75ths - Y is sometimes 176 but I doubt they really gaf about maintaining that. (obviously everyone should shoot for 180 but still.)jagerbom79 wrote:Prob not too much because of the score band (Cant remember what the +/- is)Alexandros wrote:I really don't think there's much, if any, advantage of 177+ over 175+.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login