December 2010 Initial Reactions Forum

[vhtlau]

stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.

[joebloe]

stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.

Rap was real. Source: myself, with the exp LG. Sorry, bro.

[Moral_Midgetry]

stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.

That was the real deal. Sorry bro.

[bee's vision]

Noticing the next page contained a bunch of text thinking RC or LR. Enter Stained Glass and Conference games, hello mediocrity.

Lol. Once I turned the page it took me a couple of seconds to comprehend what I was looking at. LR? no. RC? no. It looks like something from the 1950s.

[SchopenhauerFTW]

.

[bartleby]

Remove, paranoid about that Internet threat.

[Cpwilson]

no worries bartleby. Things will turn out fine.

[StrictlyLiable]

What do you think the 160/165 curve will be?

[capnb]

---

[Bless]

I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.

[gens1tb]

Remove, paranoid about that Internet threat.

that has also caused me to not post in this thread

[CmonSD]

I had RC, LR, LG, LG, LR and got raped on the first LG. (exp I guess?) I vary rarely ever miss a question and I gave up and started filling in bubbles. I was about to walk out. The 2nd with the windows I finished without a problem...We are positive it was the exp with the stagecoach/vault/mirror game?

[Moral_Midgetry]

I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.

I resent being called a little pussy.

[chup]

I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.

Thank you for your valuable contribution to this forum.

[Cpwilson]

CmonSD just leave.

[bartleby]

Yeah, can we clarify what exactly we can or cannot talk about? We're not talking about specific questions or answers. Can we not say Stars or Game 1 or Game 2 without going into detail?

I understand TLS liability but I'm now unclear about what we can or cannot talk about.

[joebloe]

This was my third LSAT (153, 160, ???). I know I did better than June, but I'm not sure if I did better than October.

On the real LG section, I finished 2 games, half the 3rd, and just acceptability on the 4th (guessed on the rest). I figure I missed 8-10 on the LG section alone . I figure I missed 4-6 on each LR section and 6-9 on RC. So... I probably missed 22-31 questions.

So I probably got 69%-78% (mean of 73.5%) or, based on the last half dozen LSATs, ranges of (156-159) for 69%, (162-164) for 78% [and (159-161) for the mean of 73.5%]. This LSAT should be around the high end of each range hopefully (or higher).

So I don't know whether to cancel or if it matters one way or another since its my third test. I figure I might as well just let it ride and hope for the best.

I don't think it's gonna matter; if you do worse (or don't do a whole lot better), you're probably only going to be applying to schools that take your highest anyway. Hope you aren't riding a bad GPA like me, bud.

[CmonSD]

CmonSD just leave.

Ouch?

[gens1tb]

Yeah, can we clarify what exactly we can or cannot talk about? We're not talking about specific questions or answers. Can we not say Stars or Game 1 or Game 2 without going into detail?

I understand TLS liability but I'm now unclear about what we can or cannot talk about.

the sticky says that's ok but I haven't been here long enough to not be paranoid

[Moral_Midgetry]

CmonSD just leave.

Ouch?

I think s/he is upset because us losers that have been on this thread since getting out of the test are tired of seeing the same questions that have been throughly answered be asked again, and again, and again.

[joebloe]

So, does anybody have his/her appetite back yet?

I'm thinking steak tartar, just because I don't give a damn anymore if I get some foodborne illness.

[kwais]

I'm sure this has been asked and answered but I'd love a little clarity.
So if the curve is predetermined and for some reason the amount of people they thought would get a certain number of questions right don't, does that mean that the percentiles (97%, 98%...) are meaningless? are they adjusted?

[capnb]

I don't think it's gonna matter; if you do worse (or don't do a whole lot better), you're probably only going to be applying to schools that take your highest anyway. Hope you aren't riding a bad GPA like me, bud.

probably worse lol

[deakon10]

I know this sounds evil but seeing all these posts about the LG makes me really feel better.. I've been kicking myself since the moment I ended the LG (section 5 for me) and did the writing part.

I have never had so little room to write or draw..the first game was soooo many words. I have been accustomed to -0 or -1 recently, and never run out of time. But I got time called and I still had 4 blank - had time to fill in one guess but didn't even fill in 3 bubbles. So that means a minimum of 3-4 wrong =( on LG... the most learnable and my best section.

also I got so accustomed to prep test paper material (nice thick white paper) that this cheap paper kept ripping and was hard for me to use with my sharp pencils..plus it sucked erasing on it. ugh.. fml. I guess june lsat + 2012 cycle cud be in play.

[CmonSD]

CmonSD just leave.

Ouch?

I think s/he is upset because us losers that have been on this thread since getting out of the test are tired of seeing the same questions that have been throughly answered be asked again, and again, and again.[/quote

Sorry my bad! I was just freaked out cuz I am terrible at every other section other than LG so if I screwed that up I have no hope. Good luck