June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
-
carasrook

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Definitely nowhere near as bad as the 33 min proctor, but I was seated in the back row, and two proctors were sitting on a bench directly behind me and whispering (loudly) to each other for the first five minutes of my first section. It was UNbelievably distracting, and I kept shooting them death glares, which I honestly feel like messed up my vibes for the whole test.
-
Kcrowell

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Sounds like you had the same sections I did. The first two LR were the real ones (1st 25 and the 26). I asked about a few questions from the third and people with two sections or the other experimental didn't have them, but everyone has the first two.bzam10 wrote:Hi all - just sharing my take.
I had an LR(25) LG LR(26) LR(25) RC.
From what I've been able to gather on multiple threads, the LR26 was real (babblers -> movie producers, I believe). I think the first LR may have been experimental, but I'm not sure. Unfortunately, I can't remember which questions were in each of the LR25's for the life of me...
Test anxiety made me really slow on the first LR and I remember guessing between two answers on a few. The second LR (26) I remember being relatively breezy. Third LR, after the break, I'm afraid I got a little too slow and ended up having to blindly 'D' the last 5... gahh.
- Giro423

- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:26 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Last edited by Giro423 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
fofo1221

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Where do you see anything besides topics?HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Mods edited my OP and multiple people have already posted bannable content. I'm telling them to stop.fofo1221 wrote:Where do you see anything besides topics?HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
fofo1221

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.HennessyVSOP wrote:Mods edited my OP and multiple people have already posted bannable content. I'm telling them to stop.fofo1221 wrote:Where do you see anything besides topics?HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
A. Not directed at anyone in particular, nor particularly vicious. Just a reminder not to do the one thing you're not supposed to do after taking the test that some people are still doing.
Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.
B. Can you really not handle being called a dumbass?
-
fofo1221

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Dude stop trolling get a life.HennessyVSOP wrote:A. Not directed at anyone in particular, nor particularly vicious. Just a reminder not to do the one thing you're not supposed to do after taking the test that some people are still doing.
Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.
B. Can you really not handle being called a dumbass?
- Giro423

- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:26 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
If I had LR-lg-LR-LR-Rc, would my first LR passage necessarily be the same as someone else with the same section pattern? I'm guessing so but not sure...
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
-
Kcrowell

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Oh good point... I actually don't think it has to be. I think they can be any order. I had been just assuming everyone who had those three had the same 25-26-25 (since no one is saying they had 26-25-25 or anything) but I guess there's no reason your first 25 couldn't have been my third.CTrus wrote:If I had LR-lg-LR-LR-Rc, would my first LR passage necessarily be the same as someone else with the same section pattern? I'm guessing so but not sure...
-
fofo1221

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.fofo1221 wrote:You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
fofo1221

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Please follow rule below.HennessyVSOP wrote:Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.fofo1221 wrote:You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You're going to make a great esq.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I have always done this during tests, even back in school. Don't know if I have ever taken a test and not given someone a death stare at least once.... idk why bc I know they aren't seeing it but I just feel the need to give it to them for being an idiot.carasrook wrote:Definitely nowhere near as bad as the 33 min proctor, but I was seated in the back row, and two proctors were sitting on a bench directly behind me and whispering (loudly) to each other for the first five minutes of my first section. It was UNbelievably distracting, and I kept shooting them death glares, which I honestly feel like messed up my vibes for the whole test.
Telling people to stop being stupid bc they are doing things that are not allowed isn't really bullying. While there are rules this is still the internet so things aren't all rainbows and butterflies. Not trying to be mean but relax a bitfofo1221 wrote:Please follow rule below.HennessyVSOP wrote:Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.fofo1221 wrote:You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
That tree one was weirddodint wrote:Yeah, the Illiad question dealt with Troy not being as big as they thought when they found it.Christinabruin wrote:Does anyone remember an LR question about Homer's Iliad and something about mature/immature trees? I had 3 LR sections so...
The tree question was weird, didn't like it. Something to do with allowing invasive moths to breed uncontrolled to stop forest fires.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
this happens pretty often. LSAC reuses questions with very small tweaks all the timeTheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah I figured. Although I don't remember which Q it was, I know I did it relatively faster because I somewhat remembered what the argument was about, I just think the Q type was different.Smallville wrote:this happens pretty often. LSAC reuses questions with very small tweaks all the timeTheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
-
LitigatingLiar

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
History game? it wasn't complicated but you had to think it through a little. At least to me.carasrook wrote:Exactly what happened to me, I can't stop thinking about it. Sooo mad at myself. LG is definitely always my best section. Idk what happened.nerdylsat wrote:Everyone is saying this was the easiest LG and i totally fucked up g3 and had to guess.
Guess its time to get ready for September.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
StopLawying

- Posts: 691
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:23 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yes, are you talking about parents representing children? Could've sworn I saw the EXACT same question on a previous PTTheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
-
railyard

- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:26 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Hope your future employment has a safe space so that when your boss uses profanity to simply emphasize the constant rule breaking needs to stop you can go run to it. Get real.fofo1221 wrote:Please follow rule below.HennessyVSOP wrote:Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.fofo1221 wrote:You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
- proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
fofo1221 wrote:Please follow rule below.HennessyVSOP wrote:Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.fofo1221 wrote:You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.
Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.

-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Lol yall should see the PM he just sent me.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login