June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

WHATS THE FUCKING CURVE

-11
21
21%
wats a curve
8
8%
-10
5
5%
-11
16
16%
-15
4
4%
-7
6
6%
JOSÉ CURVE-O
33
33%
-12
8
8%
 
Total votes: 101

carasrook

Bronze
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by carasrook » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:10 am

Definitely nowhere near as bad as the 33 min proctor, but I was seated in the back row, and two proctors were sitting on a bench directly behind me and whispering (loudly) to each other for the first five minutes of my first section. It was UNbelievably distracting, and I kept shooting them death glares, which I honestly feel like messed up my vibes for the whole test.

Kcrowell

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:08 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Kcrowell » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:11 am

bzam10 wrote:Hi all - just sharing my take.

I had an LR(25) LG LR(26) LR(25) RC.

From what I've been able to gather on multiple threads, the LR26 was real (babblers -> movie producers, I believe). I think the first LR may have been experimental, but I'm not sure. Unfortunately, I can't remember which questions were in each of the LR25's for the life of me...

Test anxiety made me really slow on the first LR and I remember guessing between two answers on a few. The second LR (26) I remember being relatively breezy. Third LR, after the break, I'm afraid I got a little too slow and ended up having to blindly 'D' the last 5... gahh.

:roll:
Sounds like you had the same sections I did. The first two LR were the real ones (1st 25 and the 26). I asked about a few questions from the third and people with two sections or the other experimental didn't have them, but everyone has the first two.

User avatar
Giro423

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:26 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Giro423 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:15 am

:lol:
Last edited by Giro423 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

fofo1221

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by fofo1221 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:17 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Where do you see anything besides topics?

Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:20 am

fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Where do you see anything besides topics?

Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.
Mods edited my OP and multiple people have already posted bannable content. I'm telling them to stop.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


fofo1221

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by fofo1221 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:22 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Hey dumbasses. Stop posting test content. Against the rules. This thread is just for waiting.
Where do you see anything besides topics?

Also, kind of rude... Hope your 2.5 serves you well.
Mods edited my OP and multiple people have already posted bannable content. I'm telling them to stop.
Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:29 am


Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.
A. Not directed at anyone in particular, nor particularly vicious. Just a reminder not to do the one thing you're not supposed to do after taking the test that some people are still doing.

B. Can you really not handle being called a dumbass?

fofo1221

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by fofo1221 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:31 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:

Just saying you can be polite. Swearing is fine but not when it is viscous and directed at someone like that.
A. Not directed at anyone in particular, nor particularly vicious. Just a reminder not to do the one thing you're not supposed to do after taking the test that some people are still doing.

B. Can you really not handle being called a dumbass?
Dude stop trolling get a life.

User avatar
Giro423

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:26 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Giro423 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:32 am

If I had LR-lg-LR-LR-Rc, would my first LR passage necessarily be the same as someone else with the same section pattern? I'm guessing so but not sure...

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:34 am

Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?

Kcrowell

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:08 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Kcrowell » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:35 am

CTrus wrote:If I had LR-lg-LR-LR-Rc, would my first LR passage necessarily be the same as someone else with the same section pattern? I'm guessing so but not sure...
Oh good point... I actually don't think it has to be. I think they can be any order. I had been just assuming everyone who had those three had the same 25-26-25 (since no one is saying they had 26-25-25 or anything) but I guess there's no reason your first 25 couldn't have been my third.

fofo1221

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by fofo1221 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:35 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:40 am

fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


fofo1221

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:48 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by fofo1221 » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:44 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.
Please follow rule below.

No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:51 am

You're going to make a great esq.

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:00 am

carasrook wrote:Definitely nowhere near as bad as the 33 min proctor, but I was seated in the back row, and two proctors were sitting on a bench directly behind me and whispering (loudly) to each other for the first five minutes of my first section. It was UNbelievably distracting, and I kept shooting them death glares, which I honestly feel like messed up my vibes for the whole test.
I have always done this during tests, even back in school. Don't know if I have ever taken a test and not given someone a death stare at least once.... idk why bc I know they aren't seeing it but I just feel the need to give it to them for being an idiot.
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.
Please follow rule below.

No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
Telling people to stop being stupid bc they are doing things that are not allowed isn't really bullying. While there are rules this is still the internet so things aren't all rainbows and butterflies. Not trying to be mean but relax a bit

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:14 am

dodint wrote:
Christinabruin wrote:Does anyone remember an LR question about Homer's Iliad and something about mature/immature trees? I had 3 LR sections so...
Yeah, the Illiad question dealt with Troy not being as big as they thought when they found it.

The tree question was weird, didn't like it. Something to do with allowing invasive moths to breed uncontrolled to stop forest fires.
That tree one was weird

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:22 am

Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:24 am

TheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
this happens pretty often. LSAC reuses questions with very small tweaks all the time

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:27 am

Smallville wrote:
TheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
this happens pretty often. LSAC reuses questions with very small tweaks all the time
Yeah I figured. Although I don't remember which Q it was, I know I did it relatively faster because I somewhat remembered what the argument was about, I just think the Q type was different.

LitigatingLiar

Bronze
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by LitigatingLiar » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:28 am

carasrook wrote:
nerdylsat wrote:Everyone is saying this was the easiest LG and i totally fucked up g3 and had to guess. :(

Guess its time to get ready for September.
Exactly what happened to me, I can't stop thinking about it. Sooo mad at myself. LG is definitely always my best section. Idk what happened.
History game? it wasn't complicated but you had to think it through a little. At least to me.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


StopLawying

Silver
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:23 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by StopLawying » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:30 am

TheMikey wrote:Guys, I don't remember which LR it was but I swear when I was taking it, I had at least 1 question with the same stimulus as an older one during studying. I don't know if I was bugging out because of the stress of the test, or if I had actually seen it before. I'm pretty sure I saw it though. I saw someone mention this about RC and it just reminded me of that.
Yes, are you talking about parents representing children? Could've sworn I saw the EXACT same question on a previous PT

railyard

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:26 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by railyard » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:35 am

fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.
Please follow rule below.

No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
Hope your future employment has a safe space so that when your boss uses profanity to simply emphasize the constant rule breaking needs to stop you can go run to it. Get real.

User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by proteinshake » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:36 am

fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
fofo1221 wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:Lol this dude. Anyway, I know some people have already posted about their proctors cutting time short, but I'm fairly certain mine went a couple minutes short on the very first section. Like five minutes short.

Anyone else take at Johns Hopkins University?
You can laugh. Just know that this is a safe space and I will not stand for bullying here.
Holy moly, no one is bullying you, i told people to follow the LSAC rules, please fuck off.
Please follow rule below.

No bullying. This is a safe space. No one should feel unwelcome.
Image

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:38 am

Lol yall should see the PM he just sent me.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”