
Any1 ever used 1 of these?
Louis1127 wrote:is that some kind of torture device
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
http://www.radiolab.org/story/9-volt-nirvana/smccgrey wrote:Use with aforementioned Soviet psychosis meds and report back plz.BillPackets wrote:No it's the latest technology in DIYneurologicalcognitive betterment
I just split my phone charger open and touched my tongue to the electricityBillPackets wrote:http://www.radiolab.org/story/9-volt-nirvana/smccgrey wrote:Use with aforementioned Soviet psychosis meds and report back plz.BillPackets wrote:No it's the latest technology in DIYneurologicalcognitive betterment
The only relevant highlightBillPackets wrote:
Any1 ever used 1 of these?
Seems legit. Does one attach that to their body? Count me in.BillPackets wrote:The only relevant highlightBillPackets wrote:
Any1 ever used 1 of these?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sortToby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?
Oh yeah the croquet that was bomb we should have a sept thread IRL meet up n play croquetColonel_funkadunk wrote:Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sortToby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?
I am down for the meet-up. Grey never ceases to inspire and amaze. I will be wearing a comfy pair of khakis (pronounced the same way I will pronounce "car keys" if I get into Harvard), shirt, and tie. As for Beyonce I don't know much, and must therefore suspend judgement.BillPackets wrote:Oh yeah the croquet that was bomb we should have a sept thread IRL meet up n play croquetColonel_funkadunk wrote:Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sortToby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Is this like relative to where I am PTing before test day, or is there like a 170 cut off or something?sfoglia wrote:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
I love youAww, you're both very nice.Louis1127 wrote: Do u want to go out on a date sometime?
Also, no one's hair looks good right out of bed, so no reason for that to make you sad
Louis, if you score high enough on your LSAT, then we can date.
I checked out LSATqa again today. They classify difficulty but you're right, 7sage has the videos for LG right there. However, I think I might stick with LSATqa just because it seems to do the trick, and I ought to really just move on. Isn't it, though, time consuming to enter in all the answers?mornincounselor wrote:To the question re 7sage vs lsatqa I prefer 7sage. They classify the problems by difficulty and if you take a test then watch the video for a game you will see immediately under the video what choices you made on questions that game.
Or one could use one site for their initial scores and use the other for subsequent attempts or for blind review.
I listened to an interview with Graeme Blake about Canada and the LSAT, and he said the LSAT is not as important as it is in the States. GPA is more important. He also said that Canadians who take the LSAT can get in the best Canadian schools with a score in the 150s. Since you are, I"m assuming, focused on the LSAT, are you trying to get into an American law school?smccgrey wrote: The pot thing is definitely an unwarranted stereotype, but BC is unsurprisingly our version of Oregon. And Alberta is our Texas.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
boris09 wrote:Sorry for the slightly more on-topic post, but:
PT 57
LG: 22/23 (so i finally experienced the infamous muave dino game. If i hadn't made the quick decision to finish the last game before i began the dino game, i may not have had time to finish. Needed almost 15 minutes to do it, with one question being a plug and chug)
LR1: 19/26 (sigh lol)
LR2: 21/25 (not bad, i can deal)
RC: 21/27 (i suppose i can deal too)
165. (83/101)
Thoughts: quite happy with the logic games, as it seems to be fairly consistent now. For some reason i still haven't gotten a perfect LG score though! It's almost as if i have to get one easy question wrong. In terms of the RC, given that my average was -9 to -11 about three weeks ago, i'm really happy to be down to a -6. To be honest, i think i can get my target score as long as i don't do any worse than -7 in this section. Now, on to the LR. A few weeks ago i was at a point where i had never gotten under -5 for an LR section. However, as i've began doing full preptests, i've noticed myself doing better than i ever had before, averaging -2 to -4. This, of course, comes with a sacrifice. While I have been doing better than i ever have before on an individual-section basis, on the other LR section of the test i do much, much worse. I understand that the LSAT balances the test by making one section a bit tougher sometimes, but i really hope i can just fix this inconsistency issue, and get at least 2 or 3 right on the section i do worse in. With only 4 more points i could have gotten my goal score. Haven't had the chance to do intense studying for the past few days until today, but i'm really hoping that i can go into overdrive mode and get these last few points in crunch time
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login