The Official June 2017 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by dj9i27 on Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Neil_Gorsuch
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:12 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Neil_Gorsuch on Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Future Ex-Engineer
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Where do you get the bolded from? The stim doesn't say there's high interest among first years, just that the same number of students are still entering chemistry programs as there were 10 years agoNeil_Gorsuch wrote:From my perspective, the reason why E is right and B is wrong is that B does not explain all the observed facts. B does not explain why, in spite of the fact that interest among first years is high and job prospects are great, there is still a decline. Answers to paradox questions should always explain everything that happens.Future Ex-Engineer wrote:So reviewing PT 76 this evening.
Can we all agree that LR1 Q20 is absolute bullshit? The only explanation I can come up with for justifying TCR is that I would have to make the assumption that intellectual appeal is a factor in *every* *single* *student* *ever*'s decision to stay in a major. I don't think that's true - I think tons of students (especially in undergrad) go into majors because their parents pressure them or some other reason, and simply stick with a major because they feel like they have to.
I can see why A is wrong as well as C and D, but I think B is just as arguable as E on this one. Significant decline in # of undergrad degrees in natural sciences as a whole could easily help explain a significant decline in the number of chemistry degrees. And there I don't have to make some assumption about whether or not people switch majors because of intellectual appeal (it certainly wasn't a factor in my staying/choosing engineering).
- Future Ex-Engineer
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I'm in a similar situation as you GPA-wise. I feel like reverse splitter really only has meaning in context for a given school. With a 168/4.0 you'd be a reverse splitter (albeit mild) from UVA and up, but a shoe-in below (and probably receive pretty decent scholarship). With a 170/4.0 you could be looking at a Dillard/Darrow/Mordecai, but still be a reverse splitter at HYSC.dm1683 wrote:So you feel confident you'll hit your pt average? Mine is the same as you (173) and I feel like I'll come in a point or two lower. I've had a bad week; my PTs were 171, 170 and 171 again.Platopus wrote:Same here, I guessing i'll get a 173/174 depending on the curve, so probably between a -6 and a -9MediocreAtBest wrote:I feel ok about monday, I'm guessing I'll be between 172-174, was really hoping for 175+ but that shit is hard.
BTW, at what point would you consider someone with a 4.0 140 humblebrag a reverse splitter? 170? 172?
Really depends on what schools you're shooting for.
- chargers21
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by chargers21 on Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Amerision
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:22 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Haha, Thinking LSAT podcast?HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did PT79 today
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
LG: -2
RC: -3
91 raw, 171 scaled.
On review, I was pissed about missing 3 on LR1. The back end of it felt brutally hard when I was taking it, but I think my head just wasn't in it, because I made preventable mistakes. LG went well, although now I see what the fuss around the Virus game is. I plan spending tonight doing more review, and a couple timed LR sections. The hay is pretty much in the barn at this point, but I just want to keep my head in LSAT mode. I want Dallas Biglaw, so I'm aiming for UT and SMU with $$$. Probably gonna head to church tomorrow for the first time in months to pray for that 170.
Last edited by Amerision on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HenryHankPalmer
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I'm from Texas, so that's a fairly common expression actually. My dad always said it growing up, even though we didn't have a barn, or hay.Amerision wrote:Haha, Thinking LSAT podcast?HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did PT79 today
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
LG: -2
RC: -3
91 raw, 171 scaled.
On review, I was pissed about missing 3 on LR1. The back end of it felt brutally hard when I was taking it, but I think my head just wasn't in it, because I made preventable mistakes. LG went well, although now I see what the fuss around the Virus game is. I plan spending tonight doing more review, and a couple timed LR sections. The hay is pretty much in the barn at this point, but I just want to keep my head in LSAT mode. I want Dallas Biglaw, so I'm aiming for UT and SMU with $$$. Probably gonna head to church tomorrow for the first time in months to pray for that 170.
- LesPaul1995
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:29 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Analogizing between tomorrow and the opening scene of Saving Private Ryan, I hope I'm not one of the poor guys in the front who gets mowed down as soon as the hatch opens. I hope tomorrow I'm one of the guys that at least makes it to the beachhead and through the Bangalores, lol.
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yeah, I think I'll probably be right around my average. All my PT's were after a full day of work, and the ones that weren't were my best scores. I've hit 175+ enough times too that I wouldn't be surprised if I hit something in that range, too.dm1683 wrote:So you feel confident you'll hit your pt average? Mine is the same as you (173) and I feel like I'll come in a point or two lower. I've had a bad week; my PTs were 171, 170 and 171 again.Platopus wrote:Same here, I guessing i'll get a 173/174 depending on the curve, so probably between a -6 and a -9MediocreAtBest wrote:I feel ok about monday, I'm guessing I'll be between 172-174, was really hoping for 175+ but that shit is hard.
BTW, at what point would you consider someone with a 4.0 140 humblebrag a reverse splitter? 170? 172?
God help us all if a 4.0 172 is a reverse splitter. I think reverse splittler is GPA > 75th and LSAT < 25th
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
LR practice here guys, find the flawPlatopus wrote: All my PT's were after a full day of work, and the ones that weren't were my best scores.


If your PTs were all after work you should be fine. That's quite an accomplishment - when I finish work my body is running on fumes What worries me is that my scores in the late 70s have been noticeably lower than in the early 70s and 60s. A strong downward trend - my average over the last five is 172, while my average in the 60s and early 70s is around 174.
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
You have passed the test. 180 guaranteed.dm1683 wrote:LR practice here guys, find the flawPlatopus wrote: All my PT's were after a full day of work, and the ones that weren't were my best scores.![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by dj9i27 on Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Good luck tomorrow y'all!
I second DJ, you guys have some impressive PT scores and you definitely have it in you to replicate it tomorrow! Stay calm and kill it
I second DJ, you guys have some impressive PT scores and you definitely have it in you to replicate it tomorrow! Stay calm and kill it

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I use to listen to that, but they advocate for a lot of stuff that is IMHO detrimental to top scorers. Also, my worst PTs came while I was listening to them religiously but things came back up after I stopped listening. Correlation/Causation be damned, I don't listen anymore lest my scores dip.Amerision wrote:Haha, Thinking LSAT podcast?HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did PT79 today
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
LG: -2
RC: -3
91 raw, 171 scaled.
On review, I was pissed about missing 3 on LR1. The back end of it felt brutally hard when I was taking it, but I think my head just wasn't in it, because I made preventable mistakes. LG went well, although now I see what the fuss around the Virus game is. I plan spending tonight doing more review, and a couple timed LR sections. The hay is pretty much in the barn at this point, but I just want to keep my head in LSAT mode. I want Dallas Biglaw, so I'm aiming for UT and SMU with $$$. Probably gonna head to church tomorrow for the first time in months to pray for that 170.
- MediocreAtBest
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Might hit the beach today and relax, since anxiety levels until we get our scores back will probably be through the roof.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chargers21
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Good luck everyone! Y'all will be posting about your 180s in a month
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Amerision
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:22 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yeah, I definitely don't listen religiously or anything -- with nothing better to do, I'm just listening in on their last "good luck and final tips" episode.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:I use to listen to that, but they advocate for a lot of stuff that is IMHO detrimental to top scorers. Also, my worst PTs came while I was listening to them religiously but things came back up after I stopped listening. Correlation/Causation be damned, I don't listen anymore lest my scores dip.Amerision wrote:Haha, Thinking LSAT podcast?HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did PT79 today
LR1: -3
LR2: -2
LG: -2
RC: -3
91 raw, 171 scaled.
On review, I was pissed about missing 3 on LR1. The back end of it felt brutally hard when I was taking it, but I think my head just wasn't in it, because I made preventable mistakes. LG went well, although now I see what the fuss around the Virus game is. I plan spending tonight doing more review, and a couple timed LR sections. The hay is pretty much in the barn at this point, but I just want to keep my head in LSAT mode. I want Dallas Biglaw, so I'm aiming for UT and SMU with $$$. Probably gonna head to church tomorrow for the first time in months to pray for that 170.
Last edited by Amerision on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- calmike
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:40 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Good luck everyone!! 

- Saylor1720
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Good luck everyone! It's been fun. Let's all crush this thing tomorrow. See you in the waiters thread!!
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 4:52 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yes, Good Luck! We got this!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MediocreAtBest
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I'm feeling confident about all of us, guys. Just a feeling I have, and it should mean a lot coming from a lifelong pessimist! Let's all kill it tomorrow, have a beer afterwards, and get rid of our LSAT books - we wont be needing those after tomorrow.
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Just fucking quitting PT 74 3/4 of the way in. Was on track for maybe a 165-167. lowest score by far in a long time, just pathetic throughout, my worst RC score ever (-7!). Not exactly encouraging. Just feel completely braindead for no discernible reason.
Last edited by Jack_Kelly on Sun Jun 11, 2017 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Jack_Kelly wrote:Just fucking quitting PT 74 3/4 of the way in. Was on track for maybe a 165- lowest score by far in a long time, just pathetic throughout, my worst RC score ever (-7!). Not exactly encouraging. Just feel completely braindead for no discernible reason.
Don't burn yourself out today. I almost did another PT but had a feeling it might do more harm. I'm just reviewing funky logic games and some light LR/RC today. After 6 pm my time nothing lsat related minus like putting my pile of stuff together for the morning.
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yeah, I am done for the dayvtdelt wrote:Jack_Kelly wrote:Just fucking quitting PT 74 3/4 of the way in. Was on track for maybe a 165- lowest score by far in a long time, just pathetic throughout, my worst RC score ever (-7!). Not exactly encouraging. Just feel completely braindead for no discernible reason.
Don't burn yourself out today. I almost did another PT but had a feeling it might do more harm. I'm just reviewing funky logic games and some light LR/RC today. After 6 pm my time nothing lsat related minus like putting my pile of stuff together for the morning.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login