real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum

[alpha kenny body]

aw skeet skeet. AMTA for OP

appreciate the sentiment, but the haters are winning right now. they keepin' me famous though, blee dat.

you ain' doin something right unless ya got em' hatin'
[youtube]J-21wMcOWLs[/youtube]

[Instrumental]

[youtube]rK6zNmNr_TY[/youtube]

[laqueredup]

Our waiters thread is like my favorite celebs in 2016.

Dead.

start calling false greys

Eileen Grey made false greys so much fun. Rawls doesn't really lend himself to the same treatment.

Maybe some of the buildings from game 4 were grey?

[Pozzo]

[+] Spoiler

................

he denied you by calling you out in the poll :O the very thing we all are striving to change, RIP

AND by changing the thread title. Yeah, patience is a virtue. You know what else is? Commitment.

[amta]

58 Posts

[alpha kenny body]

OP's style is similar to mine when I was the OP of the October Waiters last year. Do nothing, stunt on haters, and fuck.

[amta]

OP's style is similar to mine when I was the OP of the October Waiters last year. Do nothing, stunt on haters, and fuck.

1 out of 3, not bad.

[Pozzo]

Just put all my old prep material on Craigslist. 'Tis a feeling so sweet.

[34iplaw]

Just put all my old prep material on Craigslist. 'Tis a feeling so sweet.

I'm in the middle of making a paper mache effigy to burn out of my prep materials.

[Greenteachurro]

Just put all my old prep material on Craigslist. 'Tis a feeling so sweet.

I've been finding out people are a lot used interested in old prep material than I had once thought. Have had my prep bundle on ebay for a little bit now and no bites

[Greenteachurro]

Just put all my old prep material on Craigslist. 'Tis a feeling so sweet.

I'm in the middle of making a paper mache effigy to burn out of my prep materials.

I hope that you're doing that out of honor and respect for your one true god, the LSAT. I would hope that no one would ever in their right minds disrespect the LSAT gods in the couple of weeks before the test releases. In order for you to get a good score you need to make the LSAT gods happy, not pissed.

[sethnoorzad]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

[amta]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

no one itt actually took the LSAT

[Greenteachurro]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

[sethnoorzad]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

Probably but the content in this question was so similar to some Trump proposals that he floated during that campaign. I immediately saw the connection.

[jdanz]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

Probably but the content in this question was so similar to some Trump proposals that he floated during that campaign. I immediately saw the connection.

Yeah I had the same idea. That's why I actually thought that section of LR was an experimental at first

[bearedman8]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

Probably but the content in this question was so similar to some Trump proposals that he floated during that campaign. I immediately saw the connection.

What question was this? I don't remember it at all.

[sethnoorzad]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

Probably but the content in this question was so similar to some Trump proposals that he floated during that campaign. I immediately saw the connection.

What question was this? I don't remember it at all.

Posted a response but deleted because I don't want to flout the rules. lol should not have brought up a topic when the discussion could bring us into murky waters in terms of LSAT non-disclosure.

[bearedman8]

Did anyone else want to laugh when they reached the Trump LR question? As I was doing the PT's in the 70's I was enjoying how they were coming up with stimuli whose content was related to current events -- so many climate change questions, effect of cell phone radiation on cancer etc. I remember thinking that with the election they would have plenty of fodder to add a few questions that alluded to recent news stories. I got such a kick out of it that it was distracting. I wanted to LOL literally and say "hey guys did you get to the Trump one"?

Edit: I think that this is not against the rules because I didn't mention anything about the question. Trump was not explicitly mentioned in the question and I didn't mention anything explicit about it so I expect that it's fine.

Don't they test these questions out like a couple of years before each of the tests.

Probably but the content in this question was so similar to some Trump proposals that he floated during that campaign. I immediately saw the connection.

What question was this? I don't remember it at all.

Posted a response but deleted because I don't want to flout the rules. lol should not have brought up a topic when the discussion could bring us into murky waters in terms of LSAT non-disclosure.

No worries. If you want to be safe, you're allowed to say if it was one of these topics. No question would actually mention Trump's name, so it was probably a question that I remember and am just not making the connection.

https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=13007

[ugg]

OP's style is similar to mine when I was the OP of the October Waiters last year. Do nothing, stunt on haters, and fuck.

omg I forgot u were OP of my cycle I have 0 memories :/

[amta]

OP's style is similar to mine when I was the OP of the October Waiters last year. Do nothing, stunt on haters, and fuck.

omg I forgot u were OP of my cycle I have 0 memories :/

i recall some fips tedors, the poster who fucks, jokes.

[amta]

i am going to start my own waiters thread.

e: @suralin you've been put on notice

[R. Jeeves]

i am going to start my own waiters thread.

e: @suralin you've been put on notice

do you wanna just take over the applicants thread? not sure i fuck nearly enough to deserve the honor and am willing to abdicate in favor of someone who does.

eta: also they want a spreadsheet or something now and i dont really wanna make it

[Colonel_funkadunk]

i am going to start my own waiters thread.

e: @suralin you've been put on notice

I'll join

[Mikey]

i am going to start my own waiters thread.

e: @suralin you've been put on notice

make new waiters thread --> have everyone go post in there and not in here --> be victorious