The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:31 am

"Him" is the gender neutral/unknown pronoun in English!

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:44 am

Did the thread die or is my phone just not refreshing right?

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:47 am

Muerto

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:48 am

Post removed.

Whnlifegvsulmns · Post by **Whnlifegvsulmns** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:49 am

I was reading the Roberts dissent. Very compelling points he makes.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:50 am

Post removed.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:50 am

Post removed.

jumbo2016 · Post by **jumbo2016** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:50 am

How will the SCOTUS ruling actually go about being implemented? It's not actually just automatically legal everywhere right? I know it's not the same institution but Brown V BOE took forever to be implemented everywhere

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:52 am

Post removed.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:53 am

Post removed.

drtamale · Post by **drtamale** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:53 am

Post removed...

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:54 am

Post removed.

jumbo2016 · Post by **jumbo2016** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:56 am

whacka wrote:
jumbo2016 wrote:How will the SCOTUS ruling actually go about being implemented? It's not actually just automatically legal everywhere right? I know it's not the same institution but Brown V BOE took forever to be implemented everywhere
It's not hard to implement. Now, when a gay couple comes to get a marriage license, the clerk just says "okay" instead of "no"

Do you think there will be resistance from individuals who are still opposed? We can outlaw legal discrimination but there are still a hell of a lot of people that are personally opposed. Will gay couples have trouble finding people to marry them, venues to host their weddings, etc?

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:56 am

Post removed.

JaimeD15 · Post by **JaimeD15** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:57 am

whacka wrote:
jumbo2016 wrote:How will the SCOTUS ruling actually go about being implemented? It's not actually just automatically legal everywhere right? I know it's not the same institution but Brown V BOE took forever to be implemented everywhere
It's not hard to implement. Now, when a gay couple comes to get a marriage license, the clerk just says "okay" instead of "no"

This just makes my heart so happy. <3

JaimeD15 · Post by **JaimeD15** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:58 am

I'm 24 posts away folks, what are we having for lunch today?

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:58 am

Post removed.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:00 am

Post removed.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:00 am

Post removed.

cdotson2 · Post by **cdotson2** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:02 am

Seamus887 wrote:
benwyatt wrote:
Seamus887 wrote:
Whnlifegvsulmns wrote:I was reading the Roberts dissent. Very compelling points he makes.
Yea but who cares about judicial restraint and democracy. The armies of progress march onward!
*Holds out cup to catch your tears*
Not happy at all, but kinda was expected. More disappointment at the direction the country is hell bent on taking now, just resigned to it now I suppose Global warming will destroy us all anyway.

I am avoiding facebook for a while so I don't have to look at all my liberal friends rubbing it in my face and all my republican friends act like they just died and the ensuing fights between them.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:04 am

Post removed.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:04 am

Post removed.

Whnlifegvsulmns · Post by **Whnlifegvsulmns** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:04 am

whacka wrote:
I really don't know how he can make those points without also disagreeing with policy considerations as applied to the 14th like we see in Brown, and I know he's not about to tell me that he disagrees with Brown

Unless he is basing them on separate merits. If you recognize them as similar issues, then you are correct: he cannot separate the two. However, viewing them as distinct and as different issues in general, it is much easier to separate the considerations (if my wording makes sense at all). The same words can be said in the argument, but under different circumstances, the law could be applied differently (and I'm trying to make a coherent argument in my head to justify what I'm saying but words are bad for me today).

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:05 am

Post removed.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:06 am

Post removed.