ohhhh https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0062GJS ... UTF8&psc=1Alexandros wrote:No, it was something historical, maybe WWII-related.dj9i27 wrote:was it the punk rock autobiography by the now super conservative guy?Alexandros wrote:What was that book you said I should read a while back?dj9i27 wrote: call in
Yes, this was it, thanks. I'll see if I can find it.dj9i27 wrote:ohhhh https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0062GJS ... UTF8&psc=1Alexandros wrote:No, it was something historical, maybe WWII-related.dj9i27 wrote:was it the punk rock autobiography by the now super conservative guy?Alexandros wrote:What was that book you said I should read a while back?dj9i27 wrote: call in
goes over multiple events in the 50s as well as Hiroshima bombings
Dat ass is steatopygous34iplaw wrote:You know what I'm a fan of. Obscure words that are complements but do not sound like they are complementary.
"Hey gurl, you're pulchritudinous AF."
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
What are you still doing out at this late out? Are you crepuscular or something you callipygian creature?presidentspivey wrote:Dat ass is steatopygous34iplaw wrote:You know what I'm a fan of. Obscure words that are complements but do not sound like they are complementary.
"Hey gurl, you're pulchritudinous AF."
Boys, it doesn't matter how nice the word might be if you throw it into a sentence starting with "hey gurl" or "dat ass." That's a tip from me to you!presidentspivey wrote:Dat ass is steatopygous34iplaw wrote:You know what I'm a fan of. Obscure words that are complements but do not sound like they are complementary.
"Hey gurl, you're pulchritudinous AF."
Just toying and joking around with the idea of saying something that sounds bad which is actually complementary. I mean, you don't think pulchritudinous sounds nice, do you?oopsu812 wrote:Boys, it doesn't matter how nice the word might be if you throw it into a sentence starting with "hey gurl" or "dat ass." That's a tip from me to you!presidentspivey wrote:Dat ass is steatopygous34iplaw wrote:You know what I'm a fan of. Obscure words that are complements but do not sound like they are complementary.
"Hey gurl, you're pulchritudinous AF."
It's a good outcome. Pays well and is fulfilling, but it's not an outcome you can count on from anywhere.lurksoh4rd wrote:What is TLS consensus on legal academia?
Also, what are your guys study habits like as in do you fuck around on your phone when doing homework but LSAT you hone in for 6 hours straight or...?
Hahah I know you were kidding, was just giving you a hard time.34iplaw wrote:Just toying and joking around with the idea of saying something that sounds bad which is actually complementary. I mean, you don't think pulchritudinous sounds nice, do you?oopsu812 wrote:Boys, it doesn't matter how nice the word might be if you throw it into a sentence starting with "hey gurl" or "dat ass." That's a tip from me to you!presidentspivey wrote:Dat ass is steatopygous34iplaw wrote:You know what I'm a fan of. Obscure words that are complements but do not sound like they are complementary.
"Hey gurl, you're pulchritudinous AF."
I mean... flirting with girls in real life? Who do you think I am? Barney Stinson?
It doesn't sound particularly nice, but if said in the right context, I'd appreciate it, why not? Shows some creativity!Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
if our collective LS admissions neurosis could be converted to energy, we'd be able to power the world for 100s of years. No adcomms won't care lolAlexandros wrote:Am I going to get dinged everywhere because my LSAT score is too old....
The way of the future.dj9i27 wrote:if our collective LS admissions neurosis could be converted to energy, we'd be able to power the world for 100s of years. No adcomms won't care lolAlexandros wrote:Am I going to get dinged everywhere because my LSAT score is too old....
No, but you'd get dinged everywhere if it wasn't old.Alexandros wrote:Am I going to get dinged everywhere because my LSAT score is too old....
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Last person that should be giving LR advice but drilling by question type is helpful. I never used PS but MH LR was very good if you want another book.Lalalsat96 wrote:How does one get better at Logical reasoning? I thought i had a natural aptitude for this after working through the Powerscore book clearly not. I suck. Haha help please because I don't think drilling is working
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
LSP has a good oneCottonHarvest wrote:Is there a reliable online gpa calculator? I haven't sent my transcripts to LSAC yet but am wanting to know what my LSAC gpa is.
Haha i imagine you did pretty amazing on the lsat in general so I will definitely take your LR advice. Don't know if it's worth it to go through an entirely new book but certainly will look into it. Drilling by question type is certainly a go to. Hopefully I improve. Thanks!Alexandros wrote:Last person that should be giving LR advice but drilling by question type is helpful. I never used PS but MH LR was very good if you want another book.Lalalsat96 wrote:How does one get better at Logical reasoning? I thought i had a natural aptitude for this after working through the Powerscore book clearly not. I suck. Haha help please because I don't think drilling is working
I think the most important thing is just to have something that explains each question type in depth, in a way you can understand.ngogirl12 wrote:Do you guys think going through the Manhattan LR guide is really important? This month I'm redoing the 7sage curriculum/reading Trainer and drilling. I have the Manhattan LR guide but only went through a few chapters before I jumped ship for 7Sage. Is it really worth it?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
