The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What score did you get?

Mythical 180
4
4%
170-179
22
22%
160-169
45
46%
150-159
21
21%
140-149
4
4%
130-139
0
No votes
120-129
2
2%
 
Total votes: 98

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:18 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote:
Shib26 wrote:
RonnyDiniro wrote:How's everyone doing this post LSAT morning
I feel better about it than I did last night. I still don't think I did as well as I had hoped, but don't think I outright combed it.

Also, I realized I've already been accepted and while a little extra scholly money would be nice that not everything was riding on this one score.
When a school makes a decision do they email you or do you have to just continuously check the status updater website things
Some email...some send snail mail...I've had 2 call me. I don't think I checked the status checker once since my apps went complete

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:19 pm

AbbeyS wrote:
RonnyDiniro wrote:
Shib26 wrote:
RonnyDiniro wrote:How's everyone doing this post LSAT morning
I feel better about it than I did last night. I still don't think I did as well as I had hoped, but don't think I outright combed it.

Also, I realized I've already been accepted and while a little extra scholly money would be nice that not everything was riding on this one score.
When a school makes a decision do they email you or do you have to just continuously check the status updater website things
Some email...some send snail mail...I've had 2 call me. I don't think I checked the status checker once since my apps went complete
Okay cool

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:20 pm

I will single handily get this thread to 180 pages by release date

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:24 pm

I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde.... :roll:

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:27 pm

AbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde.... :roll:
Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movie

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:31 pm

AbbeyS wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde.... :roll:
Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movie

Haha yes I noticed they were real games last time I watched !

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:31 pm

The kid who answers the Aristotle question is a well written character, makes me laugh

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:36 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde.... :roll:
Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movie

Haha yes I noticed they were real games last time I watched !
Her first day of class outfit :lol: :lol: :lol: hahaha

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:37 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:38 pm

I will wear the man version of that outfit next year.

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:47 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:51 pm

splitterfromhell wrote:Go on TLSchat.com and log in, people.
What's that :shock:

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:51 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


lsat_hellhole

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by lsat_hellhole » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:52 pm

Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:56 pm

lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyer

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:58 pm

lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standing

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:02 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote: LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standing
Actually the LSAT measures reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and analytical reasoning.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Shib26

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Shib26 » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:06 pm

lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Yes, it will be a different test than we took yesterday. Although as I understand it, there's a chance that it was given as a previously nondisclosed test, the reason for the February administration being nondisclosed is so that LSAC has a pool of tests available for sabbath observers, international, emergencies such as the UCSB lost tests in December, etc.

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:08 pm

Li'l Sebastian wrote:
RonnyDiniro wrote: LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standing
Actually the LSAT measures reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and analytical reasoning.
:lol: riiiiiiiigggghhhhtttt

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:13 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote:
:lol: riiiiiiiigggghhhhtttt
If it measures socioeconomic standing it's a total failure for me at least.

Grew up in a single parent household with my mom only making 19,000/year.




That's not to say those with more money don't have an advantage, but money is neither sufficient or necessary for doing well.
Last edited by Li'l Sebastian on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:14 pm

So all day yesterday I felt horrible about my performance on the test....and now today I'm thinking I was just being dramatic because I was only remembering the hardest questions...so I'm like, oh I probably still did good. Still a chance I got those hard questions correct......but which mood do I believe?! Did I actually do ok? Or did I get a 130? The waiting is the WORST part

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:16 pm

AbbeyS wrote:So all day yesterday I felt horrible about my performance on the test....and now today I'm thinking I was just being dramatic because I was only remembering the hardest questions...so I'm like, oh I probably still did good. Still a chance I got those hard questions correct......but which mood do I believe?! Did I actually do ok? Or did I get a 130? The waiting is the WORST part
Abbey! You most certainly didn't get a 130!!!

I'd go with whichever mood had the most evidence behind it. Just look at your practice test average. That's the best predictor.

lsat_hellhole

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by lsat_hellhole » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:16 pm

AbbeyS wrote:
lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyer
LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:19 pm

lsat_hellhole wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyer
LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.
Either way, they make the test a bit of fun for 35 minutes

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:23 pm

lsat_hellhole wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..

Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.

BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyer
LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.
you just sound upset because you couldn't do well on them lol....they're the most easily-improved section of the test. And once you understand them, they become easy points. Maybe they're testing your discipline and willingness to understand something. And if you're that upset about them, maybe you need to up your studying haha

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”