Some email...some send snail mail...I've had 2 call me. I don't think I checked the status checker once since my apps went completeRonnyDiniro wrote:When a school makes a decision do they email you or do you have to just continuously check the status updater website thingsShib26 wrote:I feel better about it than I did last night. I still don't think I did as well as I had hoped, but don't think I outright combed it.RonnyDiniro wrote:How's everyone doing this post LSAT morning
Also, I realized I've already been accepted and while a little extra scholly money would be nice that not everything was riding on this one score.
The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Okay coolAbbeyS wrote:Some email...some send snail mail...I've had 2 call me. I don't think I checked the status checker once since my apps went completeRonnyDiniro wrote:When a school makes a decision do they email you or do you have to just continuously check the status updater website thingsShib26 wrote:I feel better about it than I did last night. I still don't think I did as well as I had hoped, but don't think I outright combed it.RonnyDiniro wrote:How's everyone doing this post LSAT morning
Also, I realized I've already been accepted and while a little extra scholly money would be nice that not everything was riding on this one score.
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I will single handily get this thread to 180 pages by release date
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde.... 

- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movieAbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
AbbeyS wrote:Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movieAbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde....
Haha yes I noticed they were real games last time I watched !
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
The kid who answers the Aristotle question is a well written character, makes me laugh
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Her first day of class outfitRonnyDiniro wrote:AbbeyS wrote:Also omg I just noticed the first logic game she's practicing with her friend is that notorious grouping game with the new and used jazz/opera/rap lol that's crazy. She used real LGs for the movieAbbeyS wrote:I hate when people refer to the LSAT as the "LSATs"...they do it in Legally Blonde....
Haha yes I noticed they were real games last time I watched !



- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I will wear the man version of that outfit next year.
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
What's thatsplitterfromhell wrote:Go on TLSchat.com and log in, people.

- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Post removed.
Last edited by splitterfromhell on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyerlsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standinglsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Actually the LSAT measures reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and analytical reasoning.RonnyDiniro wrote: LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standing
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Shib26
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Yes, it will be a different test than we took yesterday. Although as I understand it, there's a chance that it was given as a previously nondisclosed test, the reason for the February administration being nondisclosed is so that LSAC has a pool of tests available for sabbath observers, international, emergencies such as the UCSB lost tests in December, etc.lsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Li'l Sebastian wrote:Actually the LSAT measures reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and analytical reasoning.RonnyDiniro wrote: LSAT measures 10% IQ and 90% Socioeconomic standing

- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
If it measures socioeconomic standing it's a total failure for me at least.RonnyDiniro wrote:
riiiiiiiigggghhhhtttt
Grew up in a single parent household with my mom only making 19,000/year.
That's not to say those with more money don't have an advantage, but money is neither sufficient or necessary for doing well.
Last edited by Li'l Sebastian on Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
So all day yesterday I felt horrible about my performance on the test....and now today I'm thinking I was just being dramatic because I was only remembering the hardest questions...so I'm like, oh I probably still did good. Still a chance I got those hard questions correct......but which mood do I believe?! Did I actually do ok? Or did I get a 130? The waiting is the WORST part
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Abbey! You most certainly didn't get a 130!!!AbbeyS wrote:So all day yesterday I felt horrible about my performance on the test....and now today I'm thinking I was just being dramatic because I was only remembering the hardest questions...so I'm like, oh I probably still did good. Still a chance I got those hard questions correct......but which mood do I believe?! Did I actually do ok? Or did I get a 130? The waiting is the WORST part
I'd go with whichever mood had the most evidence behind it. Just look at your practice test average. That's the best predictor.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.AbbeyS wrote:I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyerlsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Either way, they make the test a bit of fun for 35 minuteslsat_hellhole wrote:LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.AbbeyS wrote:I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyerlsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
you just sound upset because you couldn't do well on them lol....they're the most easily-improved section of the test. And once you understand them, they become easy points. Maybe they're testing your discipline and willingness to understand something. And if you're that upset about them, maybe you need to up your studying hahalsat_hellhole wrote:LG is a Joke. It tests your ability to do nonsense under time pressure. In no way does this measure any real world law school or law practice scenario. I hear people with autism do especially well on these games. So good, at least it gives a disadvantaged group a leg up. Other than that, it's bogus.That's why the GRE got rid of these games years ago.AbbeyS wrote:I didn't spend any money on classes & I mastered logic games. To me, it makes sense why they're on there. It tests your ability to make important inferences without fabricating details. I can see how that ability would be important as a lawyerlsat_hellhole wrote:Hey I just realized.. do the Sabbath observers who take the LSAT on Tuesday get a different exam? Because if not, they have a serious advantage in getting info from these boards..
Oh well, just one more way the LSAT gives unfair advantages, like to whoever can fork over the most $$ for expensive prep programs... or luck of the draw in getting an easier experimental version of the test instead of getting the insanely hard RC at the very end when you're the most tired.
BTW, I can understand the LR and RC being relevant to law school, but WTF about the LG? So stupid. Just seems to just be a measure of whoever spent the most time/$$$$ on test prep.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login