Post removed. Forum

[jastrauss26]

I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I don't remember any LR section having 27 and I'm hoping they didn't because I only bubbled 26 on the third LR section and am almost positive the other 2 had 25. My first LR section started with a SA fill in the blank question that looked very similar to the first one on October's test. Did that section also have the vitamin question in it or was the the other LR section? I had to guess on the last 6 of the last LR section because I took too much time re-reading questions Pretty sure one of them had something to do with chess and students getting better grades? And some question about diesel trucks.

this.

lr1 - 25 , lr2 -25, lr3-26.... im pretty sure LR1 was experimental.. the questions all felt weird... altho LR2 felt incredibly easy for some reason

I had LR - LG - LR - LR-RC

I think in earlier posts people validated that the second logical reasoning, with us having the logical reasoning experimental, was the real one.

In which case, the first one was definitely the experimental.

But someone said they had the SA fill in the blank, which was the first question of the first section for me. Anyone else?

I had LR LG LR LR RC and also remember the fill in the blank on section one, Q 1. Hoping that was real

[Nightrunner]

LITTLE KID Q

gave me trouble too.

yes, i went over this like 3 times. imo the secret was in the wording.

tread lightly

[alpha kenny body]

LITTLE KID Q

gave me trouble too.

yes, i went over this like 3 times. imo the secret was in the wording.

Yeah definitEly. hehe

[wealtheow]

btw, the curve definitely felt like -11 at the most. i would've said -10 except i dont think lsac has ever given a -10 for 101 q tests

Bee, did you think prions/70 RC was harder than todays real one (mirrors, virtual tax currency, ability v. effort)?[/quote]
honestly, i thought both of them were very mild compared to stuff like 65 (blackmail/dutch agriculture)

if pressed i'd say 70 rc was more difficult, because i only had about 3-4 extra minutes. finished today with about...8ish?[/quote]

absolutely today's was more manageable than 65. seemed a bit easier than 70.
of course i will eat my words and feel like a dolt when i do really poorly.

totally effed up the quoting, don't give a deeeyamn.

[alpha kenny body]

LITTLE KID Q

gave me trouble too.

yes, i went over this like 3 times. imo the secret was___.

tread lightly

NR how many times did you take?

edit: to help bee

[062914123]

.

[Kevinlomax]

Bee, did you think prions/70 RC was harder than todays real one (mirrors, virtual tax currency, ability v. effort)?

honestly, i thought both of them were very mild compared to stuff like 65 (blackmail/dutch agriculture)

if pressed i'd say 70 rc was more difficult, because i only had about 3-4 extra minutes. finished today with about...8ish?

damn, 8 extra minutes on RC. Fuck, thats crazy to me.

i finished with significant extra time on every single section today, which TERRIFIES me. i obsessively checked everything over in my extra time but i have this sinking feeling that i missed something because WTF WITH THE EXTRA TIME.

tread lightly

same here !.... not a good sign for you because i usually score in the mid 160's

[wealtheow]

i finished with significant extra time on every single section today, which TERRIFIES me. i obsessively checked everything over in my extra time but i have this sinking feeling that i missed something because WTF WITH THE EXTRA TIME.

same here ;_; not sure i should be glad or fearful.

[Nightrunner]

oops, sorry! i thought editing out the q would help. deleting now.

It isn't that what you said was particularly egregious, but we don't want people getting comfortable discussing the particulars of questions or how to solve them.

NR how many times did you take?

Twice.

[Ferulian]

I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I don't remember any LR section having 27 and I'm hoping they didn't because I only bubbled 26 on the third LR section and am almost positive the other 2 had 25. My first LR section started with a SA fill in the blank question that looked very similar to the first one on October's test. Did that section also have the vitamin question in it or was the the other LR section? I had to guess on the last 6 of the last LR section because I took too much time re-reading questions Pretty sure one of them had something to do with chess and students getting better grades? And some question about diesel trucks.

this.

lr1 - 25 , lr2 -25, lr3-26.... im pretty sure LR1 was experimental.. the questions all felt weird... altho LR2 felt incredibly easy for some reason

I had LR - LG - LR - LR-RC

I think in earlier posts people validated that the second logical reasoning, with us having the logical reasoning experimental, was the real one.

In which case, the first one was definitely the experimental.

But someone said they had the SA fill in the blank, which was the first question of the first section for me. Anyone else?

Yeah, the earlier posts were more likely wrong about which question had the chocolates one/oil field one, which I think they used to validate.

The current consensus is more reliable at the moment---the first section was the one that counted, most likely.

[Kimikho]

bee i can't wait till u get your js2

[062914123]

.

[alpha kenny body]

i finished with significant extra time on every single section today, which TERRIFIES me. i obsessively checked everything over in my extra time but i have this sinking feeling that i missed something because WTF WITH THE EXTRA TIME.

same here ;_; not sure i should be glad or fearful.

I am on the other side of this reasoning, I usually finish on time and didn't during any section. Eh I guess there's always February. I defaulted on about 6 Qs.

[062914123]

.

[barrelofmonkeys]

i finished with significant extra time on every single section today, which TERRIFIES me. i obsessively checked everything over in my extra time but i have this sinking feeling that i missed something because WTF WITH THE EXTRA TIME.

same here ;_; not sure i should be glad or fearful.

i mean either the test was really hard and we bombed, or the test was really easy and rushing made us miss obvious shit that will bite us in the ass when the curve comes back a -10.

bad both ways

incorrectly presumes there isn't another possibility: the test was really easy and you didn't make mistakes

[ls2014]

Selling 20 diesel trucks 3 years later... was that in the 26-question section (for the people who had 3 LR, the last section) and can we confirm that that section counted?

[taks7]

rats and potatoes anyone?

[taks7]

Selling 20 diesel trucks 3 years later... was that in the 26-question section (for the people who had 3 LR, the last section) and can we confirm that that section counted?

yep, I only had 2 lr and that was in my 26 section

[wtrc]

Just skimmed a bit and saw your posts, Bee. This makes me happy.

[KingJamesLBJ]

rats and potatoes anyone?

I was between 2 answers on this one, i hope it didnt get me

[062914123]

.

[Kevinlomax]

i thought lr1 was very hard,

RC was very hard

LG was easy...

I historically do the worst at LG...im done for

[John_rizzy_rawls]

Mirrors can go fuck themselves

[ERCiv]

Selling 20 diesel trucks 3 years later... was that in the 26-question section (for the people who had 3 LR, the last section) and can we confirm that that section counted?

That was in my 2nd LR section and I only had two so it was the real deal...

[monkeylord]

Was the LG with the movie expirimental?