June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

[chasima]

<3

[Keilz]

FWIW I thought the Roman Q was difficult

[LitigatingLiar]

mod edit: do not post the kinds of questions. user has been banned.

[etramak]

Did anyone with two LRs have a Roman Empire and climate change question?

Yup. 2 LRs and most definitely had this question

Ok good. Fairly certain this was my first section which was the easiest for me. So the hardest and the easiest. I can take that.

woah what was the roman empire question?

Fall and decline based on climate change.

Ah now i remember! I was looking at that as two separate questions

[LitigatingLiar]

Did anyone with two LRs have a Roman Empire and climate change question?

Yup. 2 LRs and most definitely had this question

Same. Good question. Nice softball pitch.

OK. So I didn't miss something. It seemed a little too easy for a later question.

[longpig]

mod edit: don't post the kinds of questions on the test. user has been banned.

[Kcrowell]

...I had 3 LR, and I don't remember any koala questions. What type of question was it?

I had 2 LR sections and i definitely had the koala question.

THE PLOT THICKENS...

Ugh I'm so confused now! Koala question or no koala question?[/quote]
I had 2 LRs, remember every question on the exam, and there wasn't any damn Koala question[/quote]

I had 3 LRs and I'm pretty positive I had no koala question.

[2000andBeyond]

Ok one more for the 2 LR people...

Anyone have one about writing in Chinese and it being used to communicate between groups speaking diverse dialects? It was a must be true/most strongly supported question I believe. Towards end of section.

Don't recall that one!

[bananus]

Anyone remember a fairly difficult #8 on an LR section? I only had 2 LR and completely forget the topic of the question, just remember that I was surprised to get tripped up on such a low numbered question.

[longpig]

^^^ thanks y'all. Looks like my easy first section was a real LR

[longpig]

Anyone remember a fairly difficult #8 on an LR section? I only had 2 LR and completely forget the topic of the question, just remember that I was surprised to get tripped up on such a low numbered question.

Yeah I specifically remember that too. I think it was the same section with the babblers? I also don't remember the topic.

[Kcrowell]

mod edit: don't say what kind of questions were on the test. user has been banned.

[bananus]

Anyone remember a fairly difficult #8 on an LR section? I only had 2 LR and completely forget the topic of the question, just remember that I was surprised to get tripped up on such a low numbered question.

I do! I have no clue if it's the one you're thinking of, but the one I'm thinking of was about juries being more likely to believe evidence during a trial than they would be in normal life. mod edit question I think. It was in the 26 question one.

YES! Pretty tricky, unless I missed something obvious.

[footballlax55]

so.... Does anyone know if the spiders and snakes in Guam was a real or experimental question? (and was it in the same section as the world literature question or the one about the bike lanes and buses and avenue?)

[acidwash]

so.... Does anyone know if the spiders and snakes in Guam was a real or experimental question? (and was it in the same section as the world literature question or the one about the bike lanes and buses and avenue?)

world literature was real.

i don't think snakes or bike lanes were.

[Kcrowell]

so.... Does anyone know if the spiders and snakes in Guam was a real or experimental question? (and was it in the same section as the world literature question or the one about the bike lanes and buses and avenue?)

I didn't have a spiders/snakes in Guam question so I think it was fake. I did have the god-awful world literature question, and that section was real.

[bananus]

so.... Does anyone know if the spiders and snakes in Guam was a real or experimental question? (and was it in the same section as the world literature question or the one about the bike lanes and buses and avenue?)

world literature was real.

i don't think snakes or bike lanes were.

Yeah, I had world literature. No snakes or bikes.

[dodint]

I don't remember anything about Spiders/Snakes/Guam.

I had World Lit.

Didn't have bikes/buses.

[Kcrowell]

Anyone remember a fairly difficult #8 on an LR section? I only had 2 LR and completely forget the topic of the question, just remember that I was surprised to get tripped up on such a low numbered question.

I do! I have no clue if it's the one you're thinking of, but the one I'm thinking of was about juries being more likely to believe evidence during a trial than they would be in normal life. Evaluate the Argument question I think. It was in the 26 question one.

YES! Pretty tricky, unless I missed something obvious.

Agreed. I ended up having to more or less guess because I was running out of time. There were a couple in that section that really sidelined me.

[ayylmao]

The poll proves that we're ether a grossly unrepresentative sample, are extremely overconfident, or both.

[appind]

you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.

But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.

this sucks dick.

it sucks major dick. also, glad that the universe brought us together Jeevesy so I could confirm this madness the second I got home.......... ugh

yeah thank fuck youre here.

how do you think you did on the test though?

my main dilemma is that there was a shit easy LG and the parts of the test that i didnt rush on due to our shitbrain proctor's timing I actually felt pretty good about. I cant really say if ill actually do better on a properly timed retake.

you those affected should file complaint to lsac regardless. that dumb proctor should have his pay docked at the least.

If the proctor really cut off multiple sections right at 33 minutes, I suspect he may have been a saboteur. That's a pretty bizarre mistake.

33 min sharp for multiple sections does sound bizarre. could it be that the proctor began to count time since the end of last section, so that the announcement at the end of prev section, the brief gap between sections, and instructions at the beginning of section all added up to about 2 mins?

[longpig]

The poll proves that we're ether a grossly unrepresentative sample, are extremely overconfident, or both.

Just as one slice of proof of the former, I was getting pretty freaked out about my admissions photo from this forum because there was a fucking door in the background and people were claiming the bg had to be solid. Then they of course let me in without a second glance, and there was a little kerfuffle with this girl whose photo was literally 1cm big... and she was still allowed to take it!!!

I mean obviously better safe than sorry but that was really crazy. Like there were no more than 25 pixels in her entire photo.

[ayylmao]

The poll proves that we're ether a grossly unrepresentative sample, are extremely overconfident, or both.

Just as one slice of proof of the former, I was getting pretty freaked out about my admissions photo from this forum because there was a fucking door in the background. Then they of course let me in without a second glance, and there was a little kerfuffle with this girl whose photo was literally 1cm big... and she was still allowed to take it!!!

I mean obviously better safe than sorry but that was really crazy. Like there were no more than 25 pixels in her entire photo.

Lmao. Yeah we're a really neurotic bunch. When you get to the test center you realize just how much more prepared you are than 95% of other takers. Like people were getting caught with mechanical pencils and motherfucking cell phones. Cell phones.

[somewhatferal]

Oh yeah the damn juries being more likely to believe scientists during a trial question. Jesus christ I couldn't figure that one out. No wonder I ran out of time on that damn section.

[Mikey]

The poll proves that we're ether a grossly unrepresentative sample, are extremely overconfident, or both.

Just as one slice of proof of the former, I was getting pretty freaked out about my admissions photo from this forum because there was a fucking door in the background. Then they of course let me in without a second glance, and there was a little kerfuffle with this girl whose photo was literally 1cm big... and she was still allowed to take it!!!

I mean obviously better safe than sorry but that was really crazy. Like there were no more than 25 pixels in her entire photo.

Lmao. Yeah we're a really neurotic bunch. When you get to the test center you realize just how much more prepared you are than 95% of other takers. Like people were getting caught with mechanical pencils and motherfucking cell phones. Cell phones.

The guy in front of me whipped out his phone at the end of the writing sample, lol.