The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

peke · Post by **peke** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 8:57 am

whacka wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:Reddit compiled LR questions that are real:

Babbling babies LR1
average income discrepancies
long/short nozzles on rockets
access to tv and reading
Schizophrenia
Homeowners/unemployment discrepancy
Election candidate high taxes
Decreased income due to government policies claim
Rock albums/LP art LR1
Sickly birds and predators

shout out to Graeme for being the mod on two great subreddits

farming with moon phases
life on the moon
monohull ships

LR1 in LR RC LR LR LG is confirmed real then

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 8:59 am

Post removed.

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 8:59 am

TheWalkingDebt wrote:I remember there being a blood cell response time question I thought was really tough and I think that was in my 2nd lr section (third overall section on mine). Anyone with just two lrs have that?

Also is the above bannable? Trying to not get banned a third time.

That was in one of my 3 LR sections also. What you posted should be fine.

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
JackelJ wrote:You know you're a washed up poster when no one responds to any of your ~15 posts in a waiters thread lol
Don't talk about Rigo like that

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:01 am

Dan0504 · Post by **Dan0504** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:02 am

whacka wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:I remember there being a blood cell response time question I thought was really tough and I think that was in my 2nd lr section (third overall section on mine). Anyone with just two lrs have that?

Also is the above bannable? Trying to not get banned a third time.
The one with coffee and tea? If so I had that. I also thought that one was tricky until I figured it out and almost had to smack myself. It was one of those where the answer is so obvious once you realize, but the wording makes it tough.

I had that also but I had 3 LR, took me a second as well, plus I had to pee so bad at the time

... I just want my score!!!!

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:04 am

Dan0504 · Post by **Dan0504** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:05 am

whacka wrote:
Dan0504 wrote:
I had that also, took me a second as well, plus I had to pee so bad at the time ... I just want my score!!!!
lol I bet a question about coffee didn't help

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:08 am

So what is everyone doing to fill the time that was filled with LSAT studying before yesterday?

tasmith · Post by **tasmith** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:10 am

So no matter what, if you had 3 LRs, one of them is the experimental? Fuck man just cut that LG out completely, that shithead ruined my score then...

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:11 am

Post removed.

Dan0504 · Post by **Dan0504** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:13 am

tasmith wrote:So no matter what, if you had 3 LRs, one of them is the experimental? Fuck man just cut that LG out completely, that shithead ruined my score then...

Yes, So there are 2-LR's 1-RC and 1-LG on every test. The other section is experimental and can be any of the 3 types.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:13 am

tasmith wrote:So no matter what, if you had 3 LRs, one of them is the experimental? Fuck man just cut that LG out completely, that shithead ruined my score then...

yes every LSAT consists of 2 scored LR sections, 1 RC, and 1 LG

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:16 am

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:23 am

whacka wrote:
JackelJ wrote:So what is everyone doing to fill the time that was filled with LSAT studying before yesterday?
thinking about the lsat and trying to tell myself I can still get a 173.................. I woke up in the middle of the night last night after having a nightmare about LG and just thought about the test for an hour. Someone help

I spent like 2 hours last night being half-asleep and thinking about the test. I really have no idea how I did in RC and I'm pretty sure that'll make or break a 170+ score for me. But nothing I can do about it now.

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:23 am

I think my second lr was experimental (one with coffee abd tea about blood cell response) then based on the thread,which is a relief.

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:24 am

JackelJ wrote:So what is everyone doing to fill the time that was filled with LSAT studying before yesterday?

Picking my Spanish studies back up and looking for jobs

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:25 am

amd3_3 · Post by **amd3_3** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:27 am

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
peke wrote:
whacka wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:Reddit compiled LR questions that are real:

Babbling babies LR1
average income discrepancies
long/short nozzles on rockets
access to tv and reading
Schizophrenia
Homeowners/unemployment discrepancy
Election candidate high taxes
Decreased income due to government policies claim
Rock albums/LP art LR1
Sickly birds and predators

shout out to Graeme for being the mod on two great subreddits

farming with moon phases
life on the moon
monohull ships

LR1 in LR RC LR LR LG is confirmed real then
People with 3 LRs still had different experimentals / had them in different orders

Agreed. There is a lot of speculation swirling around, when it was confirmed that the 26q LR was experimental. If you, like me, were LR (26) - RC - LR (25) - LR (25) - LG, the first LR had to be the experimental. No matter what question type was on it or how difficult you think it was.

Someone please jump in if this was wrong, but if the non-LR experimental takers had 2 sections with 25 LR questions, you know 26q was experimental. That being said, the LR-RC-LR-LR-LG format may not have had your 26q as section 1, or you had 25-25-25. If you had anything LR with 26q, however, that is most definitely experimental.

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:27 am

whacka wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:I think my second lr was experimental (one with coffee abd tea about blood cell response) then based on the thread,which is a relief.
No it definitely wasn't. LG was my experimental and I had that one.

I don't know if that question was in section two or three honestly I'm mostly guessing it was in two

tasmith · Post by **tasmith** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:29 am

Dan0504 wrote:
tasmith wrote:So no matter what, if you had 3 LRs, one of them is the experimental? Fuck man just cut that LG out completely, that shithead ruined my score then...
Yes, So there are 2-LR's 1-RC and 1-LG on every test. The other section is experimental and can be any of the 3 types.

So really if one looks ahead and sees if there are duplicate RC or LG, or a third LR one would know it would be one of those? Man I am going to need the accommodations for October unless they mixed up my last name with an Asian.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:32 am

Post removed.

tedofsandimas · Post by **tedofsandimas** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:39 am

TheWalkingDebt wrote:I think my second lr was experimental (one with coffee abd tea about blood cell response) then based on the thread,which is a relief.

I had an experimental RC (RC-LR-LG-RC-LR) and I had that question, so unfortunately that one is real. I spent far too long on that question.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:40 am

Post removed.

peke · Post by **peke** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:43 am

Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.

tedofsandimas · Post by **tedofsandimas** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:44 am

Black Ticonderogas are a potential sign of a fellow TLS-er, right? There was a guy in my room with those and a Staedtler eraser. I would have said something to him but my room was extremely quiet and no one was talking to anyone else at all.

My testing center was great even with the hour drive there. The proctors had clearly done this before and we were out of there at 5.