Post removed. Forum

[barrelofmonkeys]

HI BABY. SEE YOU IN C/O THREADS STARTING MONDAY.

monday just got a whole lot better

[action90]

No, LSAC TRIES to determine the curve with during test construction, they cannot KNOW. If we all did horribly and would need -15 to reach the top 3%, are you telling me that LSAC will just leave us as is because we didn't fit into their pre-conceived distribution?

Yes.

did not know that, thought I read differently.

[ls2014]

I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I don't remember any LR section having 27 and I'm hoping they didn't because I only bubbled 26 on the third LR section and am almost positive the other 2 had 25. My first LR section started with a SA fill in the blank question that looked very similar to the first one on October's test. Did that section also have the vitamin question in it or was the the other LR section? I had to guess on the last 6 of the last LR section because I took too much time re-reading questions Pretty sure one of them had something to do with chess and students getting better grades? And some question about diesel trucks.

this.

lr1 - 25 , lr2 -25, lr3-26.... im pretty sure LR1 was experimental.. the questions all felt weird... altho LR2 felt incredibly easy for some reason

I had LR - LG - LR - LR-RC

I think in earlier posts people validated that the second logical reasoning, with us having the logical reasoning experimental, was the real one.

In which case, the first one was definitely the experimental.

But someone said they had the SA fill in the blank, which was the first question of the first section for me. Anyone else?

[Fifth_Business]

I had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR and, despite the discussion here, I STILL can't figure out which LG section is the real deal and it's driving me nuts. A few people mentioned "summaries", but I don't recall that at all. Who's willing to tread the line as close as possible without getting banned to help me figure this out??

Book summaries.

[062914123]

.

[wealtheow]

what the hell is MMORPG? lsat has done bad bad things to my memory..

world of warcraft

[ftbchamp232]

Maybe I just over thought it then, there was one answer that stood out but didn't seem right. I am hoping I will surprise myself when the scores come out. I felt like I got everything wrong in October but managed a 168 (towards the high end of my PT range).

[USAO-vet]

I had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR and, despite the discussion here, I STILL can't figure out which LG section is the real deal and it's driving me nuts. A few people mentioned "summaries", but I don't recall that at all. Who's willing to tread the line as close as possible without getting banned to help me figure this out??

Book summaries.

Man, that doesn't even ring a bell. Can you elaborate any more? Remember any of the other games in the actual, etc.?

[alpha kenny body]

I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I don't remember any LR section having 27 and I'm hoping they didn't because I only bubbled 26 on the third LR section and am almost positive the other 2 had 25. My first LR section started with a SA fill in the blank question that looked very similar to the first one on October's test. Did that section also have the vitamin question in it or was the the other LR section? I had to guess on the last 6 of the last LR section because I took too much time re-reading questions Pretty sure one of them had something to do with chess and students getting better grades? And some question about diesel trucks.

this.

lr1 - 25 , lr2 -25, lr3-26.... im pretty sure LR1 was experimental.. the questions all felt weird... altho LR2 felt incredibly easy for some reason

I had LR - LG - LR - LR-RC

I think in earlier posts people validated that the second logical reasoning, with us having the logical reasoning experimental, was the real one.

In which case, the first one was definitely the experimental.

But someone said they had the SA fill in the blank, which was the first question of the first section for me. Anyone else?

I said that and it was one of the first questions. I had 2 real LR.

[Kevinlomax]

I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I don't remember any LR section having 27 and I'm hoping they didn't because I only bubbled 26 on the third LR section and am almost positive the other 2 had 25. My first LR section started with a SA fill in the blank question that looked very similar to the first one on October's test. Did that section also have the vitamin question in it or was the the other LR section? I had to guess on the last 6 of the last LR section because I took too much time re-reading questions Pretty sure one of them had something to do with chess and students getting better grades? And some question about diesel trucks.

this.

lr1 - 25 , lr2 -25, lr3-26.... im pretty sure LR1 was experimental.. the questions all felt weird... altho LR2 felt incredibly easy for some reason

I had LR - LG - LR - LR-RC

I think in earlier posts people validated that the second logical reasoning, with us having the logical reasoning experimental, was the real one.

In which case, the first one was definitely the experimental.

But someone said they had the SA fill in the blank, which was the first question of the first section for me. Anyone else?

this.

[dreamofNYC]

so for those who had

LR - LG-LR- LR -RC

which was experimental !?!?!?

I had the same setup. I had 2 26q LRs and a 25q LR. The 25q LR was real (vanilla/chocolate), and the 26q LR (concrete drying/ cracking) are real. I had my LRX section 3, and my real LRs on Section 1 and 4. I'm just really happy that that 25q LR was real

Sorry which of the LRs were real in your opinion? 1st and 4th? If so, can I give you a virtual HUG????

[taks7]

I remember a question about little kids, numbers, and teachers singing to them in my 2nd lr... (hopefully not too much info)

I feel like it gave me difficulty and is going to haunt me until scores come out

[alpha kenny body]

I had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR and, despite the discussion here, I STILL can't figure out which LG section is the real deal and it's driving me nuts. A few people mentioned "summaries", but I don't recall that at all. Who's willing to tread the line as close as possible without getting banned to help me figure this out??

Book summaries.

Man, that doesn't even ring a bell. Can you elaborate any more? Remember any of the other games in the actual, etc.?

RSTU reviewing summaries by GLHJK

[barrelofmonkeys]

HI BABY. SEE YOU IN C/O THREADS STARTING MONDAY.

monday just got a whole lot better

btw, the curve definitely felt like -11 at the most. i would've said -10 except i dont think lsac has ever given a -10 for 101 q tests

aka, so easy you 180'd it?

[action90]

HI BABY. SEE YOU IN C/O THREADS STARTING MONDAY.

monday just got a whole lot better

btw, the curve definitely felt like -11 at the most. i would've said -10 except i dont think lsac has ever given a -10 for 101 q tests

Bee, did you think prions/70 RC was harder than todays real one (mirrors, virtual tax currency, ability v. effort)?

[062914123]

.

[wealtheow]

Got out at 1pm but had to get something to eat right away. Proctors were very efficient. It was amazing how few test takers there were compared to two years ago same time (same test site) - in 2011 there were four rooms full of people, this time, we barely fit in one room.
Anyway, I had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. I don't remember anything about trees.

I had 28 in my center and we each got a plastic table to ourselves. Pretty clutch.

nice! we had lecture hall style but tons of space.

[action90]

I remember a question about little kids, numbers, and teachers singing to them in my 2nd lr... (hopefully not too much info)

I feel like it gave me difficulty and is going to haunt me until scores come out

gave me trouble too.

[USAO-vet]

I had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR and, despite the discussion here, I STILL can't figure out which LG section is the real deal and it's driving me nuts. A few people mentioned "summaries", but I don't recall that at all. Who's willing to tread the line as close as possible without getting banned to help me figure this out??

Book summaries.

Man, that doesn't even ring a bell. Can you elaborate any more? Remember any of the other games in the actual, etc.?

RSTU reviewing summaries by GLHJK

hmmm..still not remembering. Must've been my first section, which, if true, is not gonna be good.

December 7th, 2013 a date which will live in infamy!

[062914123]

.

[barrelofmonkeys]

December 7th, 2013 a date which will live in infamy!

was waiting for this

[wealtheow]

I remember a question about little kids, numbers, and teachers singing to them in my 2nd lr... (hopefully not too much info)

I feel like it gave me difficulty and is going to haunt me until scores come out

gave me trouble too.

yuck, that one. that one and the last one about health v. serious infection. those were the only two in LR-2 that pissed me off.

[AnonymousAlterEgoC]

25-LR easy; easier than 70
26-LR rather hard; comparable to 70
RC-about the same, maybe a little harder
LG-A little harder than 70, which was stupid easy for me

[062914123]

.

[action90]

HI BABY. SEE YOU IN C/O THREADS STARTING MONDAY.

monday just got a whole lot better

btw, the curve definitely felt like -11 at the most. i would've said -10 except i dont think lsac has ever given a -10 for 101 q tests

Bee, did you think prions/70 RC was harder than todays real one (mirrors, virtual tax currency, ability v. effort)?

honestly, i thought both of them were very mild compared to stuff like 65 (blackmail/dutch agriculture)

if pressed i'd say 70 rc was more difficult, because i only had about 3-4 extra minutes. finished today with about...8ish?[/quote]

damn, 8 extra minutes on RC. Fuck, thats crazy to me.