Teen drivers was super hard, I'm surprised more people aren't freaking out about it. Also, I'm now like 90% sure I screwed up T-Rex. RIP dreams.cherrygalore wrote:I remember most of the ones that you listed (poison ivy, tomb, TV, cat food, t rex, biology) and others not so much. My least favorite question by far was the teen drivers. I had NO IDEA on that one and that never happens to me. I was able to eliminate some, but I don't remember which I ended up putting. I'm just stressing because I think my score is tied up in the last 6 questions of games, but then I'm like what if I got all those wrong and every LR I struggled on even a little bit wrong.dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:Can you not even remember the subject matter?cherrygalore wrote:I had 3 LR sections and can't remember which was in which. I felt confident at the time but I keep overthinking which is dumb cause I don't even remember specific questions hahadontsaywhatyoumean wrote:I'm not sure. Why do you ask?34iplaw wrote:Were those heavily weighted in one particular LR? haha.cherrygalore wrote:
Ugh I know. I woke up with such anxiety this morning about all of it.
As in, do any of the questions I mentioned seem familiar?
real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum
- Greenteachurro
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Teen drivers was one of those questions where as soon as you realize what the right answer is you wanna shoot yourself for spending so long on it.
- Instrumental
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
On the teen driver question, I remember reasoning how each answer could be wrong, but going with one that in my mind might possibly make sense... probably got it wrong.
- bearedman8
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
The only LR questions that I'm still unsure about are winter/summer trout and a question about violence in TV shows (I think I may have treated it as disagree when it was agree, or vice-versa).
- Instrumental
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I opened that spoiler and immediately got triggered.bearedman8 wrote:The only LR questions that I'm still unsure about are winter/summer trout and a question about violence in TV shows (I think I may have treated it as disagree when it was agree, or vice-versa).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Everyone is different, but if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't take in February, especially since it's your third take. Best case scenario- you do better than you expected in Dec, and you apply with that. Worse case scenario- you don't do better in Dec, and you sit out a cycle, build your resume, save some cash, and give yourself more time to improve for June.cianchetta0 wrote:Averaging 168-170 for fresh PT's before Dec, and high 170s for retakes.Pozzo wrote:What were you scoring on PTs? Unless there were extenuating circumstances that caused you to significantly underperform Sep/Dec, I'd be reluctant to retake again in Feb, especially since it would put you late in the cycle.cianchetta0 wrote:Question, I wrote in September and December. Scored a 164 in Sept. and I'm pretty doubtful I did much better this time around. I know I did a lot better on RC and LR in December ( I did LR Questions 10-25/26, and every RC passage, from PT's 31-79), but I fucked on the games. Basically studied weird games, but untimed, so the pressure I felt on Saturday threw me off.
Should I retake in February? or sit out a cycle and study for June/Sept?
I think in September I was generally weak in all areas, then in December showed improvement on RC and LR, but didn't have the right approach under stress to lg. Like, I had game 4 figured out before I walked out of the room, and was kicking myself for not following JY's directions (when you're stuck, flesh out the inferences that you can vs. waiting for inspiration).
I know most schools will hold your app if they see a future registration, which would push my decision out to march at least, when most slots are already filled. So that's where I'm stuck, roll with my 164 +/- what I get in Jan., or else.
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I wonder how long until LSAC includes a reading passage on trigger warnings. Then we could be triggered by "triggered." It'd be like Inception for LSAT.Instrumental wrote:I opened that spoiler and immediately got triggered.bearedman8 wrote:The only LR questions that I'm still unsure about are winter/summer trout and a question about violence in TV shows (I think I may have treated it as disagree when it was agree, or vice-versa).
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:09 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Instrumental wrote:On the teen driver question, I remember reasoning how each answer could be wrong, but going with one that in my mind might possibly make sense... probably got it wrong.
Been watching this thread for a while but my feelings towards that question inspired me to finally post. Went back and forth on that damn question so many times my head is still spinning. Additionally with the Iguanas question I thought I answered correctly but everyone talking about it has made me doubt myself.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Well lookie here a whole list of questions for me to second guess myself onbearedman8 wrote:The only LR questions that I'm still unsure about are winter/summer trout and a question about violence in TV shows (I think I may have treated it as disagree when it was agree, or vice-versa).
Wolves Eating Moose - Got
Caterpillars - Don't remember
Alexander the Great - Think I got
Bugs eating a weird thing that makes them taste bad - Think I got?
Volunteers showing up for an event - Got
Television station with a very highly watched program (Bliss) - Got
Cat Food - Don't think I got
Students taking French Literature/Biology - Pretty sure I got
Australia/South America reptiles (iguanas) coming on rafts across Pacific - Pretty sure I got
Winter/Summer Trout - Got
Water Fee on Roads Rather than Dams - Got
Students want a new cafeteria vendor - Ehhhh think I got but not 100% on- maybe 75%
Birds and Their Nests - Don't remember
18th-Century Church Organ - Pretty sure I got
T-Rex - Got
Leopard Magpie - Don't remember this
Puzzles - I Don't remember
Devaluing Companies - Vaguely remember and don't think it caused me any problems
Termites - Don't remember
Dust Mites - Don't remember
Teenage morning driving accidents and school start times - Unless I totally misunderstood the question/answer choices I got this
Global warming and ocean levels - Got
New Cars - Don't remember
Legitimate Contracts - Weird one, but I think I got it
- bearedman8
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Instrumental wrote:I opened that spoiler and immediately got triggered.bearedman8 wrote:The only LR questions that I'm still unsure about are winter/summer trout and a question about violence in TV shows (I think I may have treated it as disagree when it was agree, or vice-versa).
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Alright, let's see just how wrong my impressions are come grey day.theboringest wrote:bearedman8 wrote:
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I absolutely agree with Pozzo here. I underperformed on Sept and mainly took Dec knowing I didn't want to apply with a Feb take. I figured that, in worst case, I'll use that third take in June or next September.Pozzo wrote:Everyone is different, but if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't take in February, especially since it's your third take. Best case scenario- you do better than you expected in Dec, and you apply with that. Worse case scenario- you don't do better in Dec, and you sit out a cycle, build your resume, save some cash, and give yourself more time to improve for June.cianchetta0 wrote:Averaging 168-170 for fresh PT's before Dec, and high 170s for retakes.Pozzo wrote:What were you scoring on PTs? Unless there were extenuating circumstances that caused you to significantly underperform Sep/Dec, I'd be reluctant to retake again in Feb, especially since it would put you late in the cycle.cianchetta0 wrote:Question, I wrote in September and December. Scored a 164 in Sept. and I'm pretty doubtful I did much better this time around. I know I did a lot better on RC and LR in December ( I did LR Questions 10-25/26, and every RC passage, from PT's 31-79), but I fucked on the games. Basically studied weird games, but untimed, so the pressure I felt on Saturday threw me off.
Should I retake in February? or sit out a cycle and study for June/Sept?
I think in September I was generally weak in all areas, then in December showed improvement on RC and LR, but didn't have the right approach under stress to lg. Like, I had game 4 figured out before I walked out of the room, and was kicking myself for not following JY's directions (when you're stuck, flesh out the inferences that you can vs. waiting for inspiration).
I know most schools will hold your app if they see a future registration, which would push my decision out to march at least, when most slots are already filled. So that's where I'm stuck, roll with my 164 +/- what I get in Jan., or else.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Awesome. That's a relief. I can't remember whether I found the 25 or 26 harder, but I'll assume it was the 26 haha.Greenteachurro wrote:yeah the one w/26 questions was way harder. I think like over half of those come from that section alone.34iplaw wrote:I found one LR section much more challenging then the other.dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:I'm not sure. Why do you ask?34iplaw wrote:Were those heavily weighted in one particular LR? haha.cherrygalore wrote:
Ugh I know. I woke up with such anxiety this morning about all of it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Capt_Beatty
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:30 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Thanks all, good advice.34iplaw wrote:I absolutely agree with Pozzo here. I underperformed on Sept and mainly took Dec knowing I didn't want to apply with a Feb take. I figured that, in worst case, I'll use that third take in June or next September.Pozzo wrote:Everyone is different, but if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't take in February, especially since it's your third take. Best case scenario- you do better than you expected in Dec, and you apply with that. Worse case scenario- you don't do better in Dec, and you sit out a cycle, build your resume, save some cash, and give yourself more time to improve for June.cianchetta0 wrote:Averaging 168-170 for fresh PT's before Dec, and high 170s for retakes.Pozzo wrote:What were you scoring on PTs? Unless there were extenuating circumstances that caused you to significantly underperform Sep/Dec, I'd be reluctant to retake again in Feb, especially since it would put you late in the cycle.cianchetta0 wrote:Question, I wrote in September and December. Scored a 164 in Sept. and I'm pretty doubtful I did much better this time around. I know I did a lot better on RC and LR in December ( I did LR Questions 10-25/26, and every RC passage, from PT's 31-79), but I fucked on the games. Basically studied weird games, but untimed, so the pressure I felt on Saturday threw me off.
Should I retake in February? or sit out a cycle and study for June/Sept?
I think in September I was generally weak in all areas, then in December showed improvement on RC and LR, but didn't have the right approach under stress to lg. Like, I had game 4 figured out before I walked out of the room, and was kicking myself for not following JY's directions (when you're stuck, flesh out the inferences that you can vs. waiting for inspiration).
I know most schools will hold your app if they see a future registration, which would push my decision out to march at least, when most slots are already filled. So that's where I'm stuck, roll with my 164 +/- what I get in Jan., or else.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:09 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
andddddd ignored on my first post
- harveybirdman502
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 12:19 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
give it a while. everyone's probably still recovering or if you're like me, studying because they felt woefully unprepared.beancounter15 wrote:andddddd ignored on my first post
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
,
Last edited by dj9i27 on Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Waiting for TT to go off topic.
Work is so boring now that I'm not drilling at my desk and avoiding work.
ETA - thoughts on TLS meet up score release party? We'll essentially be sitting at a bar refreshing our phones and helping LSAC crash.
Work is so boring now that I'm not drilling at my desk and avoiding work.

ETA - thoughts on TLS meet up score release party? We'll essentially be sitting at a bar refreshing our phones and helping LSAC crash.
- amta
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I JUST WANT MY WET HOT 173 to COME OUT
- Greenteachurro
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Joining the trend
- cherrygalore
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I found one LR section much more difficult than the other two. All three questions I remember having difficulty on were in the 26 question section I believe.34iplaw wrote:I found one LR section much more challenging then the other.dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:I'm not sure. Why do you ask?34iplaw wrote:Were those heavily weighted in one particular LR? haha.cherrygalore wrote:
Ugh I know. I woke up with such anxiety this morning about all of it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CHyde
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
.
Last edited by CHyde on Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- CHyde
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
.
Last edited by CHyde on Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- dontsaywhatyoumean
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I'm even more worried now because I had 3 LR sections and I can't say that any one section felt worse than the other. They all felt really good....
at the time.
Man, opening my email this time is going to be so nervewracking. This is my second take, and if I don't get what I need... I don't know what I'll do. I'll feel so awful. Not like last year where I felt unprepared going in. I felt good this time.
at the time.
Man, opening my email this time is going to be so nervewracking. This is my second take, and if I don't get what I need... I don't know what I'll do. I'll feel so awful. Not like last year where I felt unprepared going in. I felt good this time.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Well, I'm relieved we were all in the same boat then. I haven't done worse than like -3 on a LR in a while [typically -2 to -4 between both sections], so fingers crossed.CHyde wrote:^This. I feel decent about every section except one LR. Too bad I don't remember any ACs...just the frustration that my prephrases weren't coming to me like they normally would. Oooof.cherrygalore wrote:34iplaw wrote:dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:34iplaw wrote:cherrygalore wrote: I found one LR section much more difficult than the other two. All three questions I remember having difficulty on were in the 26 question section I believe.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login