The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum

[GreenTee]

.

[Gray]

.

[Learn_Live_Hope]

What are we talking about here? It seems as if we went off topic again…

GT said something about morning sex, i asked whether GT is m/f, ze said open sexuality, i asked if gender is more appropro

all in all i think im not being politically correct about asking whether sum1 is m/f

So, LLH, in answer to your question: Yes.

ETA: Also, I'm male.

Hahaha

The only problem I have is that I can't keep up with all of you

GreenTea are you single? I have someone on my mind for you

[GreenTee]

.

[Learn_Live_Hope]

SOMEONE, QUICK, POST SOMETHING ABOUT A PT.

On it!

PT65, got rocked by the RC section on Sunday. I really want to take it again tonight, just to see if I can ace it. (Have not thoroughly reviewed yet.)

Do you think that would be a waste of time? Is it better to just review and move on to new material?

...

[downbeat14]

.

[BillPackets]

i went -1 on an lr section last night from PT66. the best i had ever done was -2. so it felt pretty good. and i was 100% sure on all of them except the one i missed. which i actually misread the question stem so, ya know, whaddyagonnado

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Honestly, if I can't have morning sex, I just don't see the point.

Ambiguous.

do u mean androgynous?

on a related note, does anyone believe that asexuality is a real thing?

No, I mean that my sexuality is open to interpretation.

M/f is legit. Gender is more of a sliding scale that is open to interpretation I think. But if bill is asking about bio m/f then that should essentially have a distinct answer.

[downbeat14]

.

[ilikebaseball]

This is excellent advice, THANK YOU! I'm going to go over PT 47 later today, and focus on only those questions where I got wrong, and look for where I went wrong on each answer.

Any advice on this:

For LR I'll usually go 14/15 on the first 15 questions - and I'll breeze by them. I'm timing myself in terms of the first 15, and I did them in just over 12 minutes yesterday. Is this just a function of me trying to breeze through the questions and missing something obvious?

I have to give you a very unsatisfying "it depends" here.

15 q's in 15 min is VERY fast. Although LR usually goes from easy to hard through a section, they always put a nasty question or two in the teens. The way to see this is by looking at when you miss an early question was it because it was hard or was it because you made a careless error. If you are consistently missing for careless reasons early in the section, consider altering your timing strategies so that you are more careful up front. Careless mistakes are your ENEMY. You don't even have to finish the sections to get a 180. Better to get correct the things you attempt that you are good enough to get right. Some of the really hard questions are poorly written, so focus on always nailing the easy/moderate and good elimination on the tough questions. This was helpful in my experience at least.

This. I think 10 in 10 is much more reasonable. When I've been doing 10 in 10, I've had plenty of time remaining. I sorta "rush" through the first 10 but just because they are usually straight forward (the first 7 or 8 are at least). Then, I really buckle down after that

[Colonel_funkadunk]

This is excellent advice, THANK YOU! I'm going to go over PT 47 later today, and focus on only those questions where I got wrong, and look for where I went wrong on each answer.

Any advice on this:

For LR I'll usually go 14/15 on the first 15 questions - and I'll breeze by them. I'm timing myself in terms of the first 15, and I did them in just over 12 minutes yesterday. Is this just a function of me trying to breeze through the questions and missing something obvious?

I have to give you a very unsatisfying "it depends" here.

15 q's in 15 min is VERY fast. Although LR usually goes from easy to hard through a section, they always put a nasty question or two in the teens. The way to see this is by looking at when you miss an early question was it because it was hard or was it because you made a careless error. If you are consistently missing for careless reasons early in the section, consider altering your timing strategies so that you are more careful up front. Careless mistakes are your ENEMY. You don't even have to finish the sections to get a 180. Better to get correct the things you attempt that you are good enough to get right. Some of the really hard questions are poorly written, so focus on always nailing the easy/moderate and good elimination on the tough questions. This was helpful in my experience at least.

I just timed myself on the last 10 q's of a section and it took 13 min. But that included two parallel reasoning.

Basically idk if I could do 10 in 10 anywhere in the last half of the section

Edit: I could have also included baseballs post in that quote

[BillPackets]

do your dizzle on the lsat

[Gray]

.

[GreenTee]

.

[BillPackets]

do your dizzle on the lsat

Does this mean what I think it means?

idk wut it means. its from curb. when leon asks larry if he did his dizzle. i think its open to interpretation...anywhere from "it means what you think it means" to "it means anything"

[BillPackets]

I don't know. It depends. I tend to think a lot more quickly and clearly after a few days without sex.

I'm going to start experimenting with PTs. Will report back.

do you really find that to be true?

[Gray]

.

[GreenTee]

.

[Gray]

.

[Learn_Live_Hope]

I don't know. It depends. I tend to think a lot more quickly and clearly after a few days without sex.

I'm going to start experimenting with PTs. Will report back.

do you really find that to be true?

Only one way to find out.

Experiment: Abstain, starting today, until I take PT66 on Saturday. Spend Saturday night with the SO, and then take PT67 on Sunday. Compare.

[GreenTee]

.

[Gray]

.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

We may not be your traditional study group, but we are definitely looking for ways to increase score.

[BillPackets]

I LOVE TLS SO MUCH OH MY GOD.

Thank you Tee. Do it for science.

And this is what I plan to yell out upon climax.

this is 180 folks

[santoki]

hi there, im looking to talk some LSAT. can anyone point me in the right direction?