Two rules were very straight forward, one of the most important aspects was a rule that was fairly subtle but provided you with the total variables for the game.Ni233 wrote:Am I the only one that struggled over the LG of volunteers?(LKG) I guessed the first three questions of it, and still cannot figure them out now. Must've misread the conditions. Wish someone can let me know where I possibly went wrong.
The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I'm on my fourth scotch on the rocks.AbbeyS wrote:Was I supposed to read this in a leprechaun voice? Because I didLitigatingLiar wrote:I felt good about the real LG but the experimental kicked me ass , especially the game about rail yards closing.Jamespd wrote:
Everybody has different strengths so a section that was easier for other people might not have been for you, and vice versa.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
With some Johnnie Walker while I watch the Republican debate.splitterfromhell wrote:How's everyone celebrating the LSAT being over?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Craft beer in hand, cheersLitigatingLiar wrote:With some Johnnie Walker while I watch the Republican debate.splitterfromhell wrote:How's everyone celebrating the LSAT being over?
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Still drunk 

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I've been nervous about my score, but I've talked myself into feeling better. I think I did better on the LG than I thought I did. And even if I did badly, it's okay as long as I didn't do too badly. :/
It's going to be a long month tho.
It's going to be a long month tho.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
How do you know this?splitterfromhell wrote:Which LG was real? Real RC was shrubs
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
How do you know? That would suck if it's true. That RC was much harder than the other. I struggled with this and I'm normally good with RC. The last couple of passages were annoyingly complex, especially the shrub/hedge one. Some of the questions for the urban sprawl passage didn't even make sense.splitterfromhell wrote:Which LG was real? Real RC was shrubs
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:35 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
That was part of the only RC I had
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
It's confirmed and has been for hours.lsat_hellhole wrote:How do you know? That would suck if it's true. That RC was much harder than the other. I struggled with this and I'm normally good with RC. The last couple of passages were annoyingly complex, especially the shrub/hedge one. Some of the questions for the urban sprawl passage didn't even make sense.splitterfromhell wrote:Which LG was real? Real RC was shrubs
- AllIn1212
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Checking in, fellow waiters! I hope you all do better than you think you did!!!
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Yes! I also had issues with these two passages. Please tell me you had two RC's like this one, and the second RC with the hedges was experimental.Morcartwright wrote:I've been kicking myself a bit for trying to do the sprawls rc for too long rather then moving on, how did people feel about hedges compared to sprawls?
Also, anyone think the final question on second rc was a bit challenging?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Confirmed for hours by who? Sorry but I'm holding out for more people to confirm this. Second RC seemed experimental.splitterfromhell wrote:It's confirmed and has been for hours.lsat_hellhole wrote:How do you know? That would suck if it's true. That RC was much harder than the other. I struggled with this and I'm normally good with RC. The last couple of passages were annoyingly complex, especially the shrub/hedge one. Some of the questions for the urban sprawl passage didn't even make sense.splitterfromhell wrote:Which LG was real? Real RC was shrubs
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Shrubs, sprawl was REAL and FUC*EDlsat_hellhole wrote:Confirmed for hours by who? Sorry but I'm holding out for more people to confirm this. Second RC seemed experimental.splitterfromhell wrote:It's confirmed and has been for hours.lsat_hellhole wrote:How do you know? That would suck if it's true. That RC was much harder than the other. I struggled with this and I'm normally good with RC. The last couple of passages were annoyingly complex, especially the shrub/hedge one. Some of the questions for the urban sprawl passage didn't even make sense.splitterfromhell wrote:Which LG was real? Real RC was shrubs
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:47 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I had
LG
LG
LR
LR
RC
Real RC was shrubs/hedges
LG
LG
LR
LR
RC
Real RC was shrubs/hedges
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
The real LG was the one with furniture, Madrid/London/Paris conference, book authorsClark1993 wrote:tedofsandimas wrote:I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RCI struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than OctoberAnd this was my last take, unfortunately.
I had them back to back at first too! Can you tell if the first or second section was the real one? I can't remember which game was in which section, but I remember not feeling as good about the first.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Bad news: It appears the real RC was the much harder one with the hedges & urban sprawl.
Good news: Everyone seems to have found this RC absurdly difficult, which will figure into how the final score is curved.
Good news: Everyone seems to have found this RC absurdly difficult, which will figure into how the final score is curved.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:47 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
lsat_hellhole wrote:Bad news: It appears the real RC was the much harder one with the hedges & urban sprawl.
Good news: Everyone seems to have found this RC absurdly difficult, which will figure into how the final score is curved.
I think LG will offset RC. Seemed (I use seemed because who really knows) like LG was redundantly easy while RC was very difficult.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 1:07 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I think it was unfair to those of us who got the real RC at the end when we were the most tired. By the time I got to the last 2 absurdly confusing and difficult passages, I was just exhausted. I'm going to complain about this.footballlax55 wrote:I got screwed with the reading experimental. Had the real section last and was tired and unfocused and the one passage about moral imperatives just seemed so dense my eyes glazed over and I was about to quit. The rest of the passages didn't seem bad, just boring. Maybe 1 or 2 of them had 1 legitimately tough question and a couple were kinda tough. If I hadn't been tired it might have been not too bad so I'd say the reading was maybe just fairly tougher than usual, but not crazy hard.
And the LG seemed to be average/slightly easier than average. I would have finished 3 or 4 min early, but I forgot a rule or two and the standard acceptable situations for 2 of the games took way longer than they should have.
I think if people messed up an important inference or two on the harder games they would have taken a lot longer/ got more wrong.
The 25 question LR seemed to be easy up until the last third and then I think like the last question or two were real hard.
And the 26 question LR seemed to be even easier in the beginning and didn't have the one or two super hard questions but had more kinda hard questions.
I'm thinking there will be a -12 curve because it seemed barely harder than average.
- Mr. Freeze
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:56 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Also got the real RC at the end. I thought that was the experimental section because I had yet to see anything that difficult.lsat_hellhole wrote:I think it was unfair to those of us who got the real RC at the end when we were the most tired. By the time I got to the last 2 absurdly confusing and difficult passages, I was just exhausted. I'm going to complain about this.footballlax55 wrote:I got screwed with the reading experimental. Had the real section last and was tired and unfocused and the one passage about moral imperatives just seemed so dense my eyes glazed over and I was about to quit. The rest of the passages didn't seem bad, just boring. Maybe 1 or 2 of them had 1 legitimately tough question and a couple were kinda tough. If I hadn't been tired it might have been not too bad so I'd say the reading was maybe just fairly tougher than usual, but not crazy hard.
And the LG seemed to be average/slightly easier than average. I would have finished 3 or 4 min early, but I forgot a rule or two and the standard acceptable situations for 2 of the games took way longer than they should have.
I think if people messed up an important inference or two on the harder games they would have taken a lot longer/ got more wrong.
The 25 question LR seemed to be easy up until the last third and then I think like the last question or two were real hard.
And the 26 question LR seemed to be even easier in the beginning and didn't have the one or two super hard questions but had more kinda hard questions.
I'm thinking there will be a -12 curve because it seemed barely harder than average.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
We just made through day one guys! And nobody got thrown into a volcano. All in all, a great day.
- RonnyDiniro
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:08 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I'm exhausted
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Wow I told myself I was going to let myself sleep in today to "celebrate" not having to be on a study schedule............wide awake at 7:30 on the dot
can I go back to normal life, LSAT? Thx

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login