The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:48 pm

Post removed...

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:48 pm

gamerish wrote:
ChillTomG wrote:Then why use the word "required"?
It's something the test writers have been doing on recent tests. They want an answer that is not only necessary, but also sufficient. A lot of people get thrown by them since we're so used to discarding sufficient answers on necessary questions but the LSAT is changing.

changing
changing
changing

*cue under-breath or audible cussing from the TLS LSAT world that has dutifully studied and analyzed LSAT question stems like the automatons we are*

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:49 pm

Post removed.

oldercoldervoice · Post by **oldercoldervoice** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:49 pm

Howdy folks, long time no see.

I had LR LR RC LR LG. Fuck me for having LG last lmao. All was going well until I got to that library shift scheduling game. Idk what it is about scheduling games but they always fuck me up.

The first two LRs were 26 Q so I know one of them was experimental; can someone copy/paste some real Qs for me? I'd scroll through and look for them but if I read another word I'm literally going to black out and die.

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:49 pm

There's a good example of this in the Manhattan book. You need 50 bucks to buy something. Having 50 bucks is both sufficient and necessary in that case. 29 would be necessary, 55 sufficient. That line where they cross is both sufficient and necessary.

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:50 pm

theugg wrote:You guys are all making me think I must have messed up game 3... I remember it definitely being a plug and chug sort of game but not that it was really that hard... Just time consuming??? If I can even remember what it was about...

I think we're fine. I thought it was more of a plug and chug thing.

sanibella · Post by **sanibella** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:50 pm

ChillTomG wrote:Well the question was easy then, and I did get it correct, but that is patently absurd.

Your extreme vacillation makes me feel like

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:50 pm

Post removed...

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:51 pm

theugg wrote:You guys are all making me think I must have messed up game 3... I remember it definitely being a plug and chug sort of game but not that it was really that hard... Just time consuming??? If I can even remember what it was about...

It was a plug and chug, and not hard. I think there was an inference that made it easier, but nothing tricky about it.

aprice15 · Post by **aprice15** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:51 pm

LR 26
LR 26
RC
LR 25
LG

NEED to know which was the experimental! Second LR had a question on LOL - did anyone else see that one?

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:52 pm

Post removed.

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:52 pm

The Abyss wrote:
theugg wrote:You guys are all making me think I must have messed up game 3... I remember it definitely being a plug and chug sort of game but not that it was really that hard... Just time consuming??? If I can even remember what it was about...
It was a plug and chug, and not hard. I think there was an inference that made it easier, but nothing tricky about it.

I'm glad both of you guys are saying it was a plug and chug. I was thinking there was an inference I may have missed that caused me to take so long.

oldercoldervoice · Post by **oldercoldervoice** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:52 pm

theugg wrote:What was the subject of game 3? Maybe that will help me remember.

Library shift scheduling. There was a guy named Hakeem.

sanibella · Post by **sanibella** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:53 pm

theugg wrote:What was the subject of game 3? Maybe that will help me remember.

Scheduling something. I don't think you did anything wrong.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:53 pm

Post removed...

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:53 pm

Post removed.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:53 pm

Post removed...

amacdon123 · Post by **amacdon123** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:55 pm

Was the LG with the board of directors real??

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:55 pm

Post removed.

CPAlawHopefu · Post by **CPAlawHopefu** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:55 pm

I dont remember the topics for LG (had two LGs).. i only remember letters for the variable. Lol.

LR
LG
RC
LR
LG

Second lg was easy as hell. The first one was brutal. Hopefully thats the experimental.

The only thing i remember from the second lg is that the third game had something to do with two shifts and it was a hybrid sequencing game. I hope this was the real one. Any inputs?

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:55 pm

Post removed...

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:56 pm

Post removed...

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:57 pm

theugg wrote:You guys are all making me think I must have messed up game 3... I remember it definitely being a plug and chug sort of game but not that it was really that hard... Just time consuming??? If I can even remember what it was about...

That's how I did it.

ftge232 · Post by **ftge232** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:57 pm

mod edit: too much info

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:57 pm

gamerish wrote:
CPAlawHopefu wrote:I dont remember the topics for LG (had two LGs).. i only remember letters for the variable. Lol.

LR
LG
RC
LR
LG

Second lg was easy as hell. The first one was brutal. Hopefully thats the experimental.

The only thing i remember from the second lg is that the third game had something to do with two shifts. I hope this was the real one. Any inputs?
Same test. First LG with the board of directors was the experimental.

Shit... I was so proud of myself for figuring that one out